dark light

Nicko

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 258 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AP 1464 Pneumatic Brakes #833478
    Nicko
    Participant

    I know this is an old post but I’m looking for the Teleflex section of AP.1464D Part 2 Sect 2 Chap 3. (ALs circa late 40’s, 50’s to support Vampire FB.9.)

    While I’m here, I thought I would post some of the pre-amble from one of the volumes so that some of the above discussion can be understood in detail. The AL that expands AP.1464 from two parts to seven parts is dated May 1944. It helpfully provides a cross-reference table for the old and new.

    If any body has the entire 1464D ca. 1950’s available as pdf, that would also be helpful. I have checked some eBay sellers but not found it yet.

    Cheers.
    [ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tAP 1464.png Views:t1 Size:t182.9 KB ID:t3842475″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3842475″,”data-size”:”medium”}[/ATTACH][ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tTeleflex.JPG Views:t1 Size:t143.8 KB ID:t3842476″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3842476″,”data-size”:”medium”}[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: "New" Forum issues. #218176
    Nicko
    Participant

    When I looked at the index page, this thread appeared at the top of the page. Poster section had my avatar but the name of Air Ministry. Hmmmmmmmm

    in reply to: "New" Forum issues. #218177
    Nicko
    Participant

    ErrolC,
    My post appears as the latest when you go to the keypublishing forum home page – the one where you get to pick from the different forums. It happened to me when I clicked on ‘home’ near top left from this very thread page. I did a search for my post referred to by Air Ministry, and found it. I made my post on 13th September and it does not appear on the Historic Aviation page that lists the threads by latest. As I’m posting from Australia, maybe there is a problem in interpreting time stamps; maybe when I posted, it thought my time stamp was GMT and therefore in the future, impossible and therefore unpublishable on the index page!!!
    See what happens with this post…

    in reply to: De Havilland Aircraft Drawing Office Handbook #795891
    Nicko
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback. : – )
    When I started at Hawker de Havilland at Bankstown in 1991 the tooling group were still using the litho process to print from mylars to make templates. When the place was closed down in 2013, the ‘lofting table’ as we called it, was still there and I was just thinking that it would be wonderful if somebody actually wanted it AND had the means etc. I wanted it but it was too big for me! I don’t know what happened to it. There were a number of disposal auctions during the shut-down period and I only went to one of them.

    Nicko
    Participant

    Thanks aircraftclocks. I figured that if I can get a hold of some No.4 x 1/2″, then I can compare with the one that was damaged.

    in reply to: Large Hatch Help #795898
    Nicko
    Participant

    Maybe it is an ‘internal’ hatch, such as one that goes in the floor of a bomber, so that crew have hand and/or visual access to bomb bay during flight. I don’t think that is a fitting for a retaining chain as the panel is attached with a hinge, but it may well be a stay that holds the panel open – the end of the stay has a little ball that goes in a little bracket on the side of the cut-out in the cabin floor.

    in reply to: Who invented C/N? #768199
    Nicko
    Participant

    Thanks Ron.

    in reply to: Who invented C/N? #777981
    Nicko
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261179[/ATTACH]
    I hope people find these interesting enough not to worry about the size of them…
    I think it would be great if we had a thread where people just shared aircraft data plate images.

    in reply to: Who invented C/N? #777996
    Nicko
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261178[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Who invented C/N? #778011
    Nicko
    Participant

    Although it does not answer the question of ‘who invented c/n’, I have attached the original article that Trevor Boughton wrote and published which discusses c/n versus msn, etc. Thanks to Trevor for providing permission to scan and share from Man and Aerial Machines. Not sure if you managed to dig up your copies of this, Ron – I noticed you contributed later on.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261177[/ATTACH]
    I will add some more soon – will just concentrate on showing some of the ID plates.

    in reply to: Who invented C/N? #778975
    Nicko
    Participant

    Sabrejet, I agree with some of your comments, but not all of them. Serial number does not necessarily apply to the military equivalent of the civilian registration; it may be true in some services but in fact not for the RAF and RAAF. if you look at the record cards and such things, the form actually says registration (although often something like just ‘aircraft’). The point is that the usual identifiers on the aircraft are actually registrations; The UK and Australian boards developed out of the same systems, and you have civil and military registrars and registrations.

    What you say about component serial numbers is absolutely true and extends to aircraft as well, and it just depends on what the manufacturer calls it. The point being what ‘serial’ means; these numbers are sequential and relate generally to the production sequence. Normally, an aircraft serial or construction number never changes, where as the registration, military or civilian, can change.

    Obviously I’m making generalisations and there are exceptions within the UK and Australia, and in some other countries this system just doesn’t apply.

    in reply to: Who invented C/N? #780440
    Nicko
    Participant

    You could say the answer to that lies in what the constructor puts on the plate. Some read ‘serial number’. Some read ‘construction number’. Both are constructor’s numbers.

    in reply to: Who invented C/N? #780476
    Nicko
    Participant

    Hi Ron et al.

    Trevor Boughton’s Man and Aerial Machines had an article plus follow-ups on this subject many years ago. It covered British, Australian and American aircraft. I will dig it up and have a look…

    in reply to: So They Converted A Halifax To Carry Spit Fuselages #810160
    Nicko
    Participant

    Mark, that is an impressive scene. Hard to imagine so many being amassed in one place.

    Cees, I was not trying to imply that the doors would carry any of the Spitfire load. The doors would still need to take some air loads and possibly enforced displacements. Anyway, if it did the job, who am I to question?!

    Cheers.

    in reply to: So They Converted A Halifax To Carry Spit Fuselages #810660
    Nicko
    Participant

    Looking at the undersides of the Halifax wings, there are a lot of panels open or removed, and looking at the different paint on various surfaces, I think the aircraft is undergoing a major servicing or rebuild; maybe it has recently exhausted its time in front-line service. The new parts of the doors seem to be well spliced to the original doors, and yet the square kick in them is structurally rather suspect. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if you wanted to transport a fuselage without wings; if the aircraft had crashed and the wings were a write-off, and the fuselage repairable, why wouldn’t you? I think areas like Maison Blanche, Algeria were very active with Spits around March, April 1943 – think of all of those photos floating around the last couple of years, some of which have been coloured, and most are in various states of disassembly post-crash – and for much of the North African campaign and on in to Sicily, there were major repair and salvage centres in Cairo and some other Egyptian cities. I think flying a fuselage east from Algeria over the now secure desert would be a pretty good way to transport a good candidate for return to service. Any Spitfire experts able to identify the mark? Mark IX? I would love to know the story of this Halifax!

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 258 total)