dark light

press

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 366 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #8, for Pictures and Discussion. #2584415
    press
    Participant

    Flogger…if you look very very attentive to the Khazakh MiG-29 photo you`ll notice something very very peculiar. Look bellow the horizontal stabilisor. You`ll notice a counter-direction (sorry for my English). I thought that aerodinamic arrangement was used only on the prototypes. Are those Khazakh Mig-29s still flying?

    in reply to: Euromil Mi-38 #2584644
    press
    Participant

    The Mi-17 production lines are not closed. Kazan and Ulan-Ade are still making Mi-17s in full throtle. The Czechs are getting new Mi-17s….14 if I`m not mistaken. Also for Romania 3 should arrive later this year or early next.
    The Mi-17 can be considered a threat to the Mi-38.

    in reply to: Euromil Mi-38 #2584657
    press
    Participant

    The Koreans also bought Mi-17s.

    The Mi-38 will have two types of engines. The VK-2500 for Russian market and the P&W for the western market.

    TinWing..you make it sound the Mi-38 will cost quite a fortune. Of course it`ll be a little expensive, but I think it`ll be cheaper the NH-90 and EH-101. So, you pay a little more for lifting capabilities higher than the Mi-17 for lower flying costs. And the Mi-17 is a proven helicopter…flying for 25 years now. If the political bullcrap prejudice wouldn`t be as it is, I think the Mi-38 will be a winner.

    Ink, over 80 countries use the Mi-17. This helicopter is living its second youth with the latest upgrades. We`ll still see the Mi-17 in the skies for quite a while…at least 25 years.

    in reply to: SERBIA'S MIGS Being Upgraded #2586894
    press
    Participant

    What is the state of the ex-Romanian airframes? I always thought it would have been a good idea for Serbia to have bought some of those. At least good for a spares source, if not to bolster the existing fleet when it was operational. Has Romania scrapped them, stripped them or are they still relatively intact?

    They are intact, allright. In fact, last I`ve heard they were for sale. They need overhauling to make them flightworthy again. They are rotting on Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase…..seen them last month.

    in reply to: Il-78 for NATO? An-72 for USAF? #2589521
    press
    Participant

    Is it me…or under the wing is what I think it is (unguided rockets pod) ? I would really like to see them fire the rockets.

    in reply to: Helicopter Training Accident video #2589703
    press
    Participant

    That`s not a training accident. It happened in Sweden last summer. This flight was a birthday gift for a 100 year old man.
    The helicopter was overweight. The pilot tried to do a running start, but a street light stood in his way.
    The 100 year old man died in the hospital a few days later.

    The helicopter wasn`t certified for passenger flights. It was registered as an experimental…or something similar.

    in reply to: SERBIA'S MIGS Being Upgraded #2591323
    press
    Participant

    SERBMIG…it`s really hard to read your posts. Could you use some punctuation marks?…you know…like..commas…exclamation marks…question marks….it would make the reading a lot easier.

    in reply to: F-15N Sea Eagle #2591380
    press
    Participant

    With the right amount of money…yes it is possible to navalise the Typhoon.

    in reply to: Mig29….no way! #2592088
    press
    Participant

    The SU-30MK does the extended Cobra falling…while the OVT does it horisontaly. I find it more impresive done horisontaly than falling.

    in reply to: Finally – the Danish EH101 arrive! #2595504
    press
    Participant

    I’m surprised they continued the display and retracted the undercarriage after this ‘dig in’, maybe a set of lightweight snow skids should be fitted at all times?

    These undercarriages are built to last! They`re not toothpickers, lol.

    in reply to: Finally – the Danish EH101 arrive! #2596120
    press
    Participant

    The Merlin can fly very well with only two engines.

    Comparing an airliner with a helicopter..isn`t that of a bright idea…I mean…a MiG-21 reaches Mach2 with only one engine 😛 Does that mean Merlin is able to reach Mach6 ? 😀 Not even Airwolf reached Mach6 and it had 2 engines…and 2 boosters.

    in reply to: Close call for the Typhoon! #2597668
    press
    Participant

    now those ARE smokey engines 😀

    ….and a sparkling nose too…

    in reply to: Close call for the Typhoon! #2598238
    press
    Participant

    I’ve seen a video showing a Rafale catapulted from CDG and immediatly doing a looping and goes as close to the sea that reactors letted a trace over the sea…

    There is a video showing a Thunderbirds F16 doing the same from an airfield and crashed.

    Nothing impressive in this Typhoon looping at plein power and from a security haltitude.

    From what I know…the Thunderbirds F-16 incident was because the pilot set his altimeter wrong. The figure he had to do was a Split S. It wasn`t because F-16 isn`t able to do the figure.

    in reply to: F16 ejection #2598303
    press
    Participant

    If an object is oncoming and to our view it swirves left it is actually going right. Therefore when the bird swirves left on our screen it is actually going into the starboard engine air intake.

    BARNOWL

    If you watch the movie closer you`ll see the bird flying clearly left of the Pitot tube.
    Port means left looking in the direction of motion.

    in reply to: F16 ejection #2598356
    press
    Participant

    and if you look, the bird enters the engine to the left of the screen, indicating an air intake on the starboard side of the fuselage

    BARNOWL

    That`s actually port. I have this video for quite a while and when I downloaded it the info said it was a British Hawk.

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 366 total)