I`ve had the chance to evaluate the F-16. One thing I`ve noticed during the evaluation is that the plane will stay in the position you put it. I mean you can let go of the stick and the plane will stay in that position. Another thing I`ve realised is that in order to make smooth landing you must fight your reflex to correct the plane. If you are coming on final approach and you believe you are not on the glide path don`t try to correct it…this is a recipe for desaster. In no time you`ll start to overcorrect it and you`ll enter pilot induced oscilations.
I`ve tried to make aerobatics maneuvers. It took me a little while to learn how much pressure to put in the stick. It requires quite some force in the arm, and I must say that after my session my right arm was tired.
As a conclusion: it takes a little while to get used to it. I found the stick tall and uncomfortable. If I were to choose between the classic and the sidestick…I`d go with the classic.
http://www.myaviation.net/search/photo_search.php?id=01059986&size=large
I don`t think that`s operational. It`s missing a piece from the top of the rotorhub.
The rotor system seems to be the one from the Mi-4, not Mi-8 on the Z-6.

Aah, this brings back some gool ol` sweet memories 😀
As quoted before, there is not much sense to go behind 30° really, except to kill yourself more quickly.
Perhaps. But during dogfights it`s one thing to know that your airplane won`t stall at and/or beyond 30AoA and if it does you can recover it without problems.
This type of rigid thinking “doesn`t make much sens to go behind 30” will make your airplanes hangar queens.
One thing I am wondering.
If the seat got off by itself, shouldn’t the legs of the pilot get stuck under the “dashboard”?
Normally the pilot should pull back his feet against the seat before setting up the ejection? Or did they add a delay between the trigger and the ejection of the seat so that the pilot has the time to pull his legs in case of an accidental ejection?
Nic
From what I know the legs are pulled by the chair from the pedals to prevent amputations. Also the chair arranges the pilot in the seat so the spine is streight to prevent injuries to it.
Bravo! Excelent video, beautiful plane, great soundtrack.
Thanks, Calimero. Now I know for sure that`s an ex Romanian helicopter. It belonged to Romavia. Some years back (2-3) they were sold to Moldova, 3 Mi-8PS and 1 Mi-8T.
Armenian Mi-8PS
I don`t want to be rude, but, can anyone tell me what`s the registration of that Mi-8PS?
I know I saw a short film with a red MiG-19 flying some acrobatic maneuvres…that might be the Red Falcon.
Indeed you’re right: the paint job and modifications are exactly the same!
That`s one of the first helicopters I`ve flown some 20 years ago. Too bad it went away, but it`s better to know that is still flying than rusting in some graveyard.
Armenian Mi-8PS
Why do I have the feeling that`s an ex-Romanian chopper?
Be vewy vewy quiet. I`m hunting fo` tewowists.
Was this topic really necesary? It`s not like I see this every day on every news channel, but I really see it every day on every news channel. Anywayz, terrorists or not..it`s not fun to watch human beings getting killed.
Also this type of topic displaying the military might and the freedom propaganda of the Freedom Country (i.e. US) is getting BORING!
Funny, that LTV LWF candidate looks a lot like the Eurofighter Typhoon of today.
It looks a lot more like the F-16 than with the Typhoon.
The difference is the F-22 is actually flying where the Flanker is just using it’s momentum to pull it off. What the F-22 is doing is far more impressive if you actually understand what you’re looking at.
Both planes are in the air…both of them are flying. Both of them are using TVC to do that maneuvre, and both of them are way beyond max Aoa. Both of them are not stalling, and the pilot is in control all the time. Except that one does it slower than the other. I don`t believe that the Su or the MiG can`t do the slower version. Wait till MAKS07 😀