dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lightning XG332 Crash escape photo #1118753
    pagen01
    Participant

    Yes you can make out what appear to be the greenhouses in the background, it also looks to have been a very low ejection, he must have been lucky to have ressumed his flying career after that.

    in reply to: Lightning XG332 Crash escape photo #1118770
    pagen01
    Participant

    That is still a powerful photograph, can anyone remind me (or us) the exact circumstances surrounding the accident?

    in reply to: Meteor T.7 WL405 and F.8 WK914 projects update. #1118396
    pagen01
    Participant

    The manager there googled the serial number on the seat and got in touch, saying he wanted the seat to go to its rightful place – back in the cockpit of the jet, so they donated it to the project. A big thank-you to him also.
    Anon.

    It’s really great to hear that things like that still happen.
    Nice update.

    in reply to: Lightning XG332 Crash escape photo #1117905
    pagen01
    Participant

    The internet is an astonishing thing, It is the right Jim, just spoken to his wife and he’s currently away but she knows the photo well.

    Can you find out if there were any more pictures of the sequence?

    I wonder how much compensation the farmer received for loss of build’s/stock and income from those 2 incidents. He’s probably a millionaire now.

    Wasn’t this before all the awful blame and claim culture?
    Maybe he just kept the DH canteen well stocked with veg, hence is ‘DH Goblin tractor’.

    in reply to: Lightning XG332 Crash escape photo #1117835
    pagen01
    Participant

    It would be interesting to hear from the photographer, but given the assignment wasn’t aircraft photography, but an incredibly lucky serendipitous shot, I’d be very surprised if there were.

    Yes I would agree with all of that, especially as he may not have been using motor drives etc in his usual work.

    Also completely agree with Adrian, it does look like the tractor could be doing airfiled grass cutting, no sign of plough.

    If Ian does get to talk to the photographer, maybe he could point him towards the forum, or take notes and write up a post about the incident.
    Will be another good Lightning story well covered by the people involved then.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1117533
    pagen01
    Participant

    Never one to look a gift horse…

    in reply to: Whats easier to fly.. Nimrod or Hunter? #1117390
    pagen01
    Participant

    I guess you need to speak to someone at Shuttleworth for the truth about the Nimrod.
    One thought though, could the Nimrods’ reputation come from the fact that it was flown off carriers in often tricky conditions?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1117418
    pagen01
    Participant

    Blimey just over an hour, must remember to save pics of more unsusual aircraft!
    It is the Australian Wackett Gannet, over to you JP!

    in reply to: Info sought; F-111 crash nr Cambridge 1979? #1116676
    pagen01
    Participant

    It is an oddity, but the F-111 is firmly designated as a fighter! The FB designation seems to have been bandied around at some stage but not taken up.
    I would say it isn’t part of the ‘Century series’ though, both numerically and timewise.

    in reply to: Info sought; F-111 crash nr Cambridge 1979? #1116374
    pagen01
    Participant

    There was the FB-111A strategic nuclear bomber variant, but fairly minor in production numbers and front-line service.
    The ‘Century’ series is generally accepted as covering the F-100 to F-109, production types, prototypes, and unflown submissions.
    They were all of a certain period and design philosophy, of which the F-111 (and F-110 Spectre – aka Phantom II) were well seperate from.

    in reply to: RAF Washingtons (B-29) #1116404
    pagen01
    Participant

    What an amazing resource for a comparitively overlooked type of the RAF, and the classic station of RAF Watton.
    Excellent read.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk. T.IX (MODIFIED) #1116258
    pagen01
    Participant

    I know nowt about Spits, but wouldn’t shortened ailerons have a greater effect on actual flying characteristics, compared to other mods?

    in reply to: Lightning XG332 Crash escape photo #1116122
    pagen01
    Participant

    Excellent stuff Ian, and thanks for sharing here.
    Did he have an original of the shot that you can get a copy from?

    in reply to: Heroism in the face of adversity. #1115577
    pagen01
    Participant

    Glosters Chief test pilot Bill Waterton was awarded a George Medal for his heroics.
    On a test flight in G.A.5 WD804 (Javelin proto) in June ’52, the elevators detatched from the tail plane in flight, realising that the loss of the valuable prototype would set the Javelin programme back Waterton decided not to eject and managed to control the aircraft sufficiently with the tailplane trim.
    He got the aircraft to Boscombe where he made an emergency landing and it subsequently caught fire, he managed to exit the cockpit and run away, then realising that the valuable test notes were still in the cockpit, he ran back and managed to recover them aswel!

    in reply to: Your favourite WWII plane? #1115428
    pagen01
    Participant

    Hmm, I really like the Handley Page Heyford, but then I also really like the Me262 – hard to believe they were in the same war.
    The Bristol Beaufighter is my favourite though, for its up to date design, presence, and sheer good service it gave.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 9,672 total)