dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1060941
    pagen01
    Participant

    You better avert your eyes for these then, another mottled 10 in the guise of XV106 W I’m afraid.
    Just to be clear, after a major the aircraft were flight tested at St Athan, after completion of that it was delivered to Filton, latter Manchester for paint, then delivered to Brize for service. It wouldn’t be seen in public or attend any airshows in between.

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7022/6505397473_4bb9fa90f8_b.jpg
    VC-10 C.1K XV106 W 3 Aug 07 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7174/6505376119_b59ccd6740_b.jpg
    VC-10 C.1K XV106 W 3 Aug 07 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7031/6505391883_0835ffd849_b.jpg
    VC-10 C.1K XV106 W 3 Aug 07 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1060949
    pagen01
    Participant

    Would the characters show up on paperwork though? Especially if they didn’t go down that well with the CO.
    Post #14 here mentions the two Ermintrudes and the reason, http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=327

    I bet somewhere someone has some nice pictures of all the cartoons applied to the aircraft.
    BTW where was the name usually written, I’ve only ever seen the cartoon?
    Subject definitely wort getting to the bottom of!:)

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1061096
    pagen01
    Participant

    The list I have was noted by a visit to 8 sqn in the late ’70s.
    According to the above mentioned book the then CO ordered all the cartoons to be removed, but after the fleet was reduced to six some of the remaining aircraft later regained a character.
    WR963 was later renamed Ermintrude II, WR965 as Roaslie II, WL790 as Zebedee.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1061122
    pagen01
    Participant

    Certainly possible, some of the Shacks were renamed for some reason.

    On page 98 of Shackleton At War & Peace, it looks a bit like Zebedee on the port side of WL795.

    in reply to: Old Black and White picture of Vulcan breaking apart #1061129
    pagen01
    Participant

    I agree with most of the comments on the clip, that looks like a flightsim, though the Vulcan itself did perform a similar manouvre.

    First time I’ve seen the VX770 footage that Baz has posted, some really nasty comments on there though:(

    in reply to: Old Black and White picture of Vulcan breaking apart #1061151
    pagen01
    Participant

    Avro 698, VX770, crash at Syreston. I believe it was caused by leading edge failure, I think that aswel as the loss of the RR Flight test crew that some of the personnel in a control caravan were killed.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1061160
    pagen01
    Participant

    I remember that, but was that the original panel (which went to ‘paradise’ in St Dennis, but may have returned?!) or the one out of WL756?
    ISTR which ever A/C it was from that it may have been swapped over sometime from WL790 which was known as Zeberdee for a while.
    Probably the most suitable name for type mind!

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #1061297
    pagen01
    Participant

    All of the 8 sqn AEWs were named and decorated with Magic Roundabout and The Herbs characters, mid – late ’70s, there is another thread here somewhere showing some of the cartoons.

    WL741 PC Knapweed
    WL745 Sage
    WL747 Florence
    WL754 Paul
    WL756 Mr Rusty
    WL757 Brian
    WL790 Mr McHenry
    WL793 Ermintrude
    WL795 Rosalie
    WR960 Dougal
    WR963 Parsley
    WR965 Dill

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1061338
    pagen01
    Participant

    Hmm, firstly I’ve seen RAF aircraft in primer and paint patches way further back than 15 years ago.
    Surely it’s more important that an aircraft safely completes a flight-test schedule before being painted up at another airfield and onward delivery to its home base, not paint first just to ‘look nice’ in case a member of the public spots it!
    Sorry but I think this reads as a case of ‘things were much better in my day lad’!

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1061576
    pagen01
    Participant

    Ah, I see, I thought the big screw jacks were for the initial setting up of the tubes and not for regular adjusting for the different versions, can’t say that I’ve ever seen them used.
    The red board that you can see next to them (under port outer engine) is the alignment marker for the different versions, only 3 K.3s and 1 K.4 still in service now though.

    I know what you mean by the intake blanks problem, chased Nimrod ones around a few times in the past – sometimes for air traffics’ amusement I think!:o

    The 10 must be one of the only western types left with two sets of throttle levers (pilots & flt engineer) installed?

    in reply to: Warbird helicopters – where are they? #1061623
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m loathed to use the term warbirds, but the British Army have had classic helicopters in their historic flight (AHAF) for a while, they have used a SARO Skeeter, Sioux, Scout, and Alouette II at various times, though I don’t know what the current status of the Skeeter is.
    There seems to be a couple of ex Navy Wasps airworthy (though I haven’t seen them this year) and there was an RAF Whirlwind kept flying a few years back now, I think there’s been mention here of a Wessex potentially being a flyer again.

    My understanding is that anything larger and more complicated than these is financially difficult to keep going fuel, parts, and maintenance wise, this has to be justified against air show appearences (and the income from them) where once a crowd has seen say a couple service helo demonstrations that they may not readily want to see much more.

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1061643
    pagen01
    Participant

    Wouldn’t that be fantastic Adrian, I have a feeling that it will miss it by 3-4 years though.

    Some pics of the detuners, these are built by Cullum who have been doing this since the early days of jets.

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7023/6504678045_404562d8d6_b.jpg
    VC-10 C.1K XV104 on detuner 14 Mar 07 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7146/6504676863_1d4efefbf3_z.jpg
    VC-10 C.1K XV104 U on detuner 19 July 10 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7159/6504726711_63389b6521_z.jpg
    VC-10 C.1K XR808 R on detuner 9 Nov 11 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7030/6504724397_115100a8bf_z.jpg
    VC-10 C.1K XR808 R on detuner 9 Nov 11 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    in reply to: B-29 Superfortresses used over Europe in WW2 #1061653
    pagen01
    Participant

    And so have I from post #18, I have even titled the image as ‘B-29 Tallboys’!

    in reply to: Anyone seen a better copy of this? #1061657
    pagen01
    Participant

    I love the Lincoln with the extra cockpit added on the nose, only the second time I’ve seen a picture of it.
    I would say the pictures are pretty contempory to the report, especially with one of the Sea Venom NF.20 prototypes booms being present.
    Im sure AlertKen has posted pics from the Farnborough dump from this period.

    in reply to: Marks of Spitfire #1061666
    pagen01
    Participant

    Tony, it’s all in the same font and appeared exactly like the scan did, even down to the column lengths and breaks, which would have to be tailored to the book shape and size.
    EB may have got it from a manual, but I would put money on the manual getting the page added from the book or author.
    I feel we’re drifting a wee bit now.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 9,672 total)