dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Helicopter Museum Update Report #1071569
    pagen01
    Participant

    Yep!

    photo of XR486 on my work hard drive so unsure who to credit it to.

    in reply to: CockpitFest 2011 – June 18/19th #1071592
    pagen01
    Participant

    This it Dave, “One cockpit is no longer coming (Canberra T4 – WJ880); however we have a replacement Balliol WN534; plus we’re expecting a Harrier cockpit exchange”

    Can’t say I noticed the Seafire 46 before, sounds like an interesting exhibit.

    in reply to: RAF Harriers Sold To The USA For Peanuts!! #1071755
    pagen01
    Participant

    TT that is absolutely brilliantly put!

    in reply to: General Discussion #314453
    pagen01
    Participant

    As soon as I saw this thread this morn I just knew you would have something to say!:)
    And you haven’t mentioned the Mustang that you gained in the deal!:D

    As for they all have it in ’em, I think we all have it in us somewhere or other.

    in reply to: It's over, but why do I need to know "why" #1855730
    pagen01
    Participant

    As soon as I saw this thread this morn I just knew you would have something to say!:)
    And you haven’t mentioned the Mustang that you gained in the deal!:D

    As for they all have it in ’em, I think we all have it in us somewhere or other.

    in reply to: Hawker Fury Engine Test on YouTube. #1072535
    pagen01
    Participant

    That Fury looks absolutely fantastic!
    Numpty question as I’m unaware of the project, but is it a restoration to fly?

    Liking the ‘yimby’ thing, a new movement me thinks!:D

    in reply to: Crecy/Wellington 75th #1072646
    pagen01
    Participant

    Happy Birthday Wimpey!

    http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a82/pagen/FA_18035s.jpg

    Flight photograph.

    in reply to: RAF Harriers Sold To The USA For Peanuts!! #1072810
    pagen01
    Participant

    The whole thing really dosen’t matter anyway, either sell them to a foreign force for parts (great if you can get £36 million for them), or store and scrap them here.

    in reply to: Vulcan photos #1072815
    pagen01
    Participant

    Lovely shot Mk12! I’m sure I would have experienced hand shake witnessing that flypast.
    There is a real way ahead look to very early Vulcans, Victors, and DH110 IMO difficult to define really, something like an old fashioned view of the future.

    That’s the iconic Vulcan for me…..but I have a feeling I’m in a minority here!;) Probably becausae not many here ever saw the white “in the flesh”.

    Not sure about that SH, the anti-flash white was the sole finish carried by the type for six or so years!
    The prototypes, VX770 & ‘777, being finished in white was just coincidental being a few years before the bomber white scheme came about.

    I must admit I would agree about the white under, camo upper, and black nose being my favourite scheme, although the all camo wrap around (in the correct paint!) comes close!
    I guess the all silver must be the rarest with just the early B.1s being used in that scheme.

    in reply to: B-26 'Flak Bait' back in the air #1072842
    pagen01
    Participant

    Wow that’s impressive, in fact the only thing that gives it away quickly is the amount of prop blades. I would have been tempted to post that without giving a description first!
    Stunning work!

    in reply to: Mary Alice on local news #1072927
    pagen01
    Participant

    Are you sure about this? So where do Spits and ME 109’s fare in this statement you have made?

    No, that’s why I asked a question and not made a statement!;)

    Actually I remembered the Ils after I posted, I kind of knew Spit and 190 levels were close to B-24, but genuinely surprised that 109 production was as high as that!
    The B-24 is generally regarded as the most highly produced US type.

    JDK makes a good case for the survival ratio, but thought that Libs were as populor for fire bombing use post-war?
    I’m guessing that the other thing which influences B-24 survival numbers is the types’ use through more theatres and roles than the B-17 and thus higher likelyhood to loss through enemy action and accidents?

    in reply to: Mary Alice on local news #1073128
    pagen01
    Participant

    Which kind of begs the question of how come there are far more B-17s about than B-24s?
    18,482* B-24s were built (highest production of run of any military aircraft?) against 12,731* B-17s, you would think the balance would be slightly different.

    *Wiki figures

    in reply to: General Discussion #314988
    pagen01
    Participant

    Do you really need training to respect your work colleagues, it comes naturally surely?
    I know exactly what Al is going on about in regard of wasteful and useless MoD courses, and he makes a very valid point about these seemingly replaceing genuinely useful progression courses.

    However I do agree that the term ‘PC’ has just become a meaning to cover a whole host of issues that it probably shouldn’t.

    in reply to: P.C. ? #1856146
    pagen01
    Participant

    Do you really need training to respect your work colleagues, it comes naturally surely?
    I know exactly what Al is going on about in regard of wasteful and useless MoD courses, and he makes a very valid point about these seemingly replaceing genuinely useful progression courses.

    However I do agree that the term ‘PC’ has just become a meaning to cover a whole host of issues that it probably shouldn’t.

    in reply to: Griffon exhaust stubs #1073525
    pagen01
    Participant

    Personally I’m struggling to think of a Griffon powered night fighter?:confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 9,672 total)