dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,691 through 3,705 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 1950's Archive Part 22:Wethersfield 1959 #1058111
    pagen01
    Participant

    Great collection of photo’s, out of interest Blackburn Beverley XM105 I note that there are window portholes in the aircraft twin booms, what exactly went inside here, passengers?

    Yes upper level and boom (only one!) was a seated passenger / paratroop area for 36 bods, the ladder is going into the upper para drop exit.

    in reply to: 1950's Archive Part 22:Wethersfield 1959 #1059079
    pagen01
    Participant

    Fantastic images again, especially for me the KB-50.
    It’s easy to forget just how long the G.91 has been around for, must have been fairly new in ’59?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1059389
    pagen01
    Participant

    Oh see what you mean!:o

    in reply to: British Aircraft Carrier Changes #2351828
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks for the answers, just another quickie are the RAF and RN now both receiving the F-35C now?
    I work along side a couple of RN pilots that are due to depart for Super Hornet training in the States and we were putting 2 and 2 together at work, but getting 5!

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1059391
    pagen01
    Participant

    Not really, someone probably made a good direct offer, and the final seller fees (extortionate) would have been avoided.
    Think of Ebay as a good shop window to show off your wares, not such a good place for making the sale.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1059435
    pagen01
    Participant

    I hope so I’m the only one that has named it!
    I opened my dialogue box before Chris posted, and certainly didn’t bother with tracing through websites etc.
    There are very few large conventionally laid out helicopters that the Marines have used, and that tail wheel assembly is pretty unique!

    After all that I don’t have anything to post!:o

    in reply to: Manston Museums visit. #1059440
    pagen01
    Participant

    The Defence Fire Training and Development Centre is under Army administration. The way I understand it is they are responsible for the overall running of the school and the courses for themselves and the RAF, this includes uniformed service personnel and uniformed civilians employed under their umbrella.
    The RAF also do their aircraft specific courses on the same site.
    It appears that any appropriate fire outfit wanting to put their personnel through various courses there can do so.
    the Navy do general fire fighting courses at Portsmouth, and aircraft related courses at Culdrose/Predannack.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1059761
    pagen01
    Participant

    Sikorsky S-56, H-37, HR2S, Mojave (take yer pick!)?

    in reply to: North East Aircraft Museum #1059892
    pagen01
    Participant

    Wow, that Whirlwind looks fantastic now, great to see so much time and effort spent on a type that others might not.:)

    in reply to: British Aircraft Carrier Changes #2352189
    pagen01
    Participant

    Ah great, thanks for the explanation.
    I’m assuming then that CATOBAR is steam catapaults?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread #1059915
    pagen01
    Participant

    Yep .. Coke cans :rolleyes:, .. and i am the only idiott who “tried” and parted with alot of money to take it on. never mind.. never again , … never ever ever again 😡

    Don’t rise to the bait Merkle you tried, maybe it wouldn’t still be with us now if you hadn’t.

    in reply to: Manston Museums visit. #1059918
    pagen01
    Participant

    They also have Nimrod XV229.

    in reply to: British Aircraft Carrier Changes #2352361
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m not swept up enough to understand most of that.
    Are you saying that we are not now having the F-35 and that another conventional catapault launched type is being chosen?

    in reply to: Manston Museums visit. #1060127
    pagen01
    Participant

    It came from nowhere but me. Thanks for clarifying the case and my misconception of it.:)

    Sorry, didn’t mean you in particular SkyHigh, it just seems a common misconception that an apparently dead airframe on a site isn’t serving some kind of useful purpose.

    in reply to: British Aircraft Carrier Changes #2352441
    pagen01
    Participant

    Sorry I should emphasise the question and I will try and simplify it as I’m not interested in the ships.
    What are the recent changes in the aircraft that have nescesated the modifications and caused the cost increases reported.
    I thought that F-35 was the choosen aircraft for the carrier, has this now changed?

Viewing 15 posts - 3,691 through 3,705 (of 9,672 total)