dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,676 through 3,690 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Beriev #1055623
    pagen01
    Participant

    It’s probably my fault for going down that road, but it should be pointed out that it was the A-40 Albatross ‘Mermaid’ that was put forward for consideration for RAF use, though very similar in layout it’s a far bigger and more powerful beast than the Be-200.

    in reply to: 1950's Archive Part 22:Wethersfield 1959 #1055628
    pagen01
    Participant

    Not quite, German & Italian Airforce G.91s used to visit the Mawgan shows towards the end of their service. Pretty sure I’ve seen Portuguese ones at Fairford aswel.

    in reply to: Beriev #1055673
    pagen01
    Participant

    They even look like their name sakes!:)

    http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a82/pagen/a_Be-12_28_01.jpg

    http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a82/pagen/hgulls.jpg

    Just looking quickly at Wiki I’m surprised at how few were built, I always remember seeing grainy pictures of them in the old aircraft and defence recogntion magazines and thinking that there fleets of them.

    in reply to: Beriev #1055852
    pagen01
    Participant

    It isn’t an amphibian – that is retractable beaching gear. It can’t land on that gear.

    Thanks again for the info, don’t forget though that with the Shin Meiwas’ the first PS-1 variant was a pure flying boat with retractable beaching gear, the later US-1 was the amphib variant

    Fantastic pictures Flyer, especially that first shot!:)

    in reply to: Beriev #1056322
    pagen01
    Participant

    Magnificant photos Ken, thanks.
    The Be-6 & 12 look really well kept, I seem to remember seeing pics of a 6 somewhere on a plinth but looking very sorry for itself.

    As for the SH-5, I have never heard of it before, does half look like a Shin Meiwa!

    in reply to: Search function #1056496
    pagen01
    Participant

    No changes there then Bruce:D

    What glitch would that be James ? Four days ago i was at Popham jumble.

    I don’t know what it was, but problems were encountered for a bit, reported in GD section.

    in reply to: Beriev #1056624
    pagen01
    Participant

    There seems to be a very small step below the mid wing position, it is less pronounced than one would think it needs though.
    I love this Be-200 photo below, copywrite of Fyodor Borisov / airliners.net.

    On Berievs’ in general, has anyone got pictures of my favourite the Be-12 Chayka?
    A real Cold-war ASW warrior, does anyone know if there are any remaining service etc?

    in reply to: Search function #1056643
    pagen01
    Participant

    The Search function has been down ever since the forum glitch about four days ago.

    in reply to: Nimrod XV235 Road Move to Cosford #1056668
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m under the impression that Cosford or JARTS will reassemble the aircraft.
    Transport is contracted out now because it has got to the stage where it is more expensive for the RAF to do it themselves when you factor driving hours, stop overs etc, plus manning can become suddenly unavailable if something happens elsewhere.
    I know that they valued a Canberra move at £100,000.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1057137
    pagen01
    Participant

    26 minutes! Excellent trail of deduction there, it is indeed Syd Holloways’ Trago Mills SAH-1, I believe Mike Whittaker is linked to the project aswel.

    I may have been too easily swayed by your SW suggestion, anyway your shout!

    in reply to: Beriev #1057166
    pagen01
    Participant

    I think one of the most tantalising what ifs, is if the RAF had replaced the Nimrod MR.2 with the Be-200 Mermaid.
    Can you imagine seeing them in a two tone grey moored at the bouys of Mount Batten or Pembroke Dock, aswel as land based at Mawgan or Kinloss, real Coastal Command stuff!

    in reply to: RAF Transport Command pics #1057181
    pagen01
    Participant

    Brilliant, two aircraft form the main part of an RAF camp!
    The Valetta write off would be an early one so I’m guessing it was VX544 here, http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19510530-1?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1057188
    pagen01
    Participant

    Ok AA, I want its original make and model name, this is probably a bit too easy though!

    in reply to: RAF Transport Command pics #1057563
    pagen01
    Participant

    Excellent recycling of Valetta and what I assume is a DC-3, look almost like aerodynamic Nissen huts!

    in reply to: RAF Transport Command pics #1057719
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’m very much appreciating the excellent pictures (especially the Bevs, C-130, C-119 line-up)), but unfortunately the grand old days of Transport Command was before my time and have little to contribute!

Viewing 15 posts - 3,676 through 3,690 (of 9,672 total)