dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Stick top ID. Can you help? #980132
    pagen01
    Participant

    Maybe an early Strikmaster? They usually bulge on the left hand side of the top casting and have an extra button in that area, but the whole grip shape looks right.

    in reply to: What plane at Strathallan? #980142
    pagen01
    Participant

    Definitely the Hurricane, the light (especially across the top front quarter of the wheel/tyre) and angle makes it look a little bit unusual possibly.

    in reply to: "Sox" Hosegood #980885
    pagen01
    Participant

    People like this certainly pioneered the helicopter into successful daily usage. Seem to recall that he had some pretty hairy moments with the Bristol 171 and 173 development trials!
    I hadn’t realised that he was a FAA pilot during the war.

    Happy Birthday!

    in reply to: Canberra PR.9 belly pod, any ideas? #980931
    pagen01
    Participant

    Thanks, any more info would be very welcome, like what period of service was it used from etc?
    Is the capsule at Duxford identical to that seen above on the Canberra?

    in reply to: Canberra PR.9 belly pod, any ideas? #981064
    pagen01
    Participant

    Great info, was the capsule the same shape as the cannon pack?

    They certainly seemed to know where to park that tug!

    pagen01
    Participant

    TonyT, as Dakotas in the UK had to stop giving passenger trips how likely is it that with the ever tightening of European/CAA regulations that a Lancaster can give passenger rides in the UK?

    in reply to: RAF leave Lyneham #982143
    pagen01
    Participant

    Are there any plans for the Comet to move elsewhere?

    RAFM Cosford, http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=114039&highlight=lyneham+comet , though I’m not sure how those plans are progressing.

    We had a brief at Saints some time ago that RAF Tech training won’t be going to Lyneham, however with the current vogue of increasingly combined multi service tech training I’m open minded about an RAF presence of some sort returning there.

    in reply to: Photo of the V.A. Type 253? #982295
    pagen01
    Participant

    Indeed welcome Michael, very unusual to find a direct link to that period of test-pilots, and would love to hear more.
    I’m assuming that this excellent webpage is about your father, https://sites.google.com/site/mickyogden/home
    I take it the 253 was trialling the Pegasus through its various developments with Bristol at the time?

    in reply to: Canberra PR.9 belly pod, any ideas? #982301
    pagen01
    Participant

    The Canberra PR.9 never fails to surprise when it comes to different bits of kit fitted to it, I’ve never seen that extra before now.
    I certainly woudn’t have thought that the cannon pack from the B(I).6/8 was ever fitted to the 9, but the shape and position seems about the same – I wonder if it’s the same structure but with cannons removed and other kit fitted?
    Great picture and interesting to see that no Unit/Sqn markings are showing in the usual position on the fin.

    in reply to: Heads Up. BBC News today. Pantons announce Lancaster to fly #983082
    pagen01
    Participant

    NX611 and PA474 (on trials) both served until 1964.
    Their post service use in the UK does intertwine, both making ferry flights in 1965, and returning to airworthy status in the UK in 1967, with NX611 making its last flight in June 1970.
    KB976 was delivered direct to Strathallan from Canada in 1975, this one flight was obviously made at the same time as PA474 was established on the airshow circuit.

    I’m just so glad that in its move from Blackpool to Scampton that cutting throiugh the spars wasn’t undertaken!

    in reply to: Operation Crossbow BBC4 20.00 2/1/13 #983175
    pagen01
    Participant

    Agreed, fascinating how the operation, and indeed the programme, weaves through and brings together the activities of the PIs at Medmenham, the RAF & USAAF PR pilots, Bomber Command, The 8th Air Force, D Day, German scientists and the most unfortunate slave labourers.
    Be interesting to suppose what might have happened had that conversation between two German generals not been bugged and acted upon by the allies!

    pagen01
    Participant

    Just caught it on the news, good little piece I thought.

    in reply to: New Year Photo Quiz #984515
    pagen01
    Participant

    Sorry yes, Thunderscreech. Also pic 1 is Quiet Short-haul Research Aircraft as OP says – too much of the New Year tipple in me I think!

    in reply to: Heads up – The Dambusters #985599
    pagen01
    Participant

    Well, was he? :rolleyes:
    http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1777897

    That’s one messed up thread!

    The one bit I don’t like in the film, is when ‘Barnes’ says that he designed the Wellington, which of course he didn’t!

    in reply to: Heads up – The Dambusters #985603
    pagen01
    Participant

    I recently got the film on DVD, and every time I watch it I marvel at it.

    I think there’s a t least four Lincolns seen, three in an arrival formation, and the one taxying past, plus the post-war turretless Wellington T.10 from St Athan taking off, this of course is MF628 now at RAFM Cosford.
    They don’t distract from the film for me at all, and I doubt many in the general cinema audiences in the 1950s would have noticed or cared.
    The biggest deviation is the bomb shape itself, but it was still on the restricted list at the time.

    I love the footage taken at both the RAF Stations and airfields at Scampton and Hemwell, as the Canberra was coming into service at both stations I’m not surprised that one shows up somewhere!

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 9,672 total)