dark light

pagen01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 9,672 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cockpit-Fest USA #959216
    pagen01
    Participant

    Wow, that must be the greatest mention of Newarks’ cockpitfest ever, and done with out Twin Otter uttering a word!
    Nice clip:)

    in reply to: Phantom to Bruntingthorpe??? #959541
    pagen01
    Participant

    Absolutely agree with DB, and also wondering how Everetts have done it again!
    Rather hoping that ‘597 would have made it to Cosford with the other testers, wouldn’t think that could happen now.

    in reply to: RAF Propellers X or + #959671
    pagen01
    Participant

    XV202 at St Athan, on the day the crew found out that they were going somewhere hot!

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7004/6720758649_ba8c96c8d1_z.jpg
    Hercules C.3 XV202 3 March 11 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    I remember with P-3s (same engine) that you could always tell when it was soon to start as the props were changed from + to X, was it the same with Hercs?

    in reply to: Raf St Athan #959680
    pagen01
    Participant

    No, it’s all at twin peaks, he’s standing on the (long) disused runway.

    in reply to: Vampire Label #959861
    pagen01
    Participant

    Flunt is a Swiss abbreviation for Flugluntertank, or under wing tank, so Bruce is likely to be right!

    in reply to: Whirlwind HAR9 helicopter question #960703
    pagen01
    Participant

    Just a thought here, I would think that David Gibbings who is the Westland archivist would be worth trying for information, much of the Fairey archive went to the Fleet Air Arm Museum, wondering if some of the Westland SARO stuff may have aswel?
    Mr Gibbings can be contacted by PMing Judwin.

    in reply to: Raf St Athan #960791
    pagen01
    Participant

    Before we all get carried away (like Bruce clearly has in the vid!), the equipment is loaned across from the Welsh Government (via now vacated DSG) and remains on site as part of the hangar itself, it will benefit the new tennants, Cardiff Aviation, as well as other companies on site – all part of a new enterprise zone initiative.

    Also this has very little to do with historic aviation!

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #961262
    pagen01
    Participant

    Erm, he is isn’t he?

    in reply to: Airworthy Vampire for sale #961270
    pagen01
    Participant

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying one is more attractive than the other, but it wasn’t that long ago that it seemed that there were Vampires and Venoms, including single seaters, all over the sky, most seem to have been grounded or exported since, which suggests to me something about their desirablility here. Will someone want to bring back one here for $125,000?
    Hard to believe that there are only two flying Vamps (both trainers) left in its home country.

    in reply to: Airworthy Vampire for sale #961815
    pagen01
    Participant

    Certainly not the ones I’m aware of, though I suppose the status of the spare engine is the deciding factor.

    Seems expensive for a Vampire, the WWII type comparison is a bit tenuous really, it really is a post-war jet trainer.

    Also worth noting that Jetguy has operated both types, so I guess he’s aware of the comparitive running costs!

    pagen01
    Participant
    in reply to: DH Hatfield, Leavesden and Chester ATC logs #962671
    pagen01
    Participant

    Received your last Lee, but you need to make room in your PM box for my reply!

    in reply to: Sea Prince Colours!!! #962700
    pagen01
    Participant

    I am sure one of the party pieces from her airshow act (and one of the more popular parts for the public with no aviation knowledge) was to fly around with one undercarriage leg up and the other down. The hydraulic system was split which made it possible to retract/extend each side independently.
    .

    The only hydraulic system on the Prince/Pembroke family is the wipers, everything else is pneumatic, not sure how they isolated one u/c side from the other.

    in reply to: Sea Prince Colours!!! #962703
    pagen01
    Participant

    …we are trying to decide which authentic colour scheme we will use to re paint her – probably grey with dayglo bands and wing panels. Was she ever painted differently? were her bands ever trainer yellow?

    Basically the Sea Prince trainers initially wore the all over silver with a golden yellow training band applied around the rear fuselage and each wing.

    then went to silver with dayglo nose, tail, and outboard wings, and white fuselage roof.

    Finally wore the all over light aircraft grey with dayglo applied as above

    http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a82/pagen/SeaPrinceT1WF128570CU.jpg
    WF128 570-CU

    http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a82/pagen/SeaPrinceT1WF118619LM.jpg
    WF118 619-LM

    Please, oh please, go for the all over silver, dayglo orange nose, tail, and wing sections, and white fuselage roof with thin cheatline scheme – the scheme just prior to going into the light aircraft grey and dayglo scheme. No other preserved Sea Prince is in these colours.
    Attached pic by friend Chris England of WM739 shown in this scheme.

    http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a82/pagen/SeaPrinceCEngland.jpg

    Hopefully see you at the hangar soon!

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8007/7303496528_81c8845fbd_c.jpg
    Sea Prince T.1 WP321 G-BRFC 30 May 12 by jamtey71, on Flickr

    in reply to: DH Hatfield, Leavesden and Chester ATC logs #962872
    pagen01
    Participant

    I’ve been trying there as well re early Vixen stuff, and meeting a brick wall, frustrating as there is possibly a great archive ready to be tapped into. I really want to find the document that John Wilson wrote about the flight trials.
    In fact Bruce has been the best DH resource so far!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 9,672 total)