A quick search on the Aussie rego (love the MBX!) gave
http://my.pinkfroot.com/photo/gloster-meteor-vh-mbx-a77-851
Built in 1949 in the UK by Gloster and is the only Gloster Meteor F.8 flying in the world.
This Meteor was originally flew with the RAF with serial no. VZ467 until 1982. After being retired from the RAF the Meteor was privately owned and operated in the UK.
Later being purchased by the Temora Aviation Museum and transported to Australia she was given the registration VH-MBX and re-took to the skies in 2001.
Since being re-painted the aircraft carries the markings of a Korean War era Meteor operated by RAAF 77 Squadron and flown by Sgt. George Hale.
What others are airworthy around the world, apart from this Aussie one?
Meteor turn by errolgc, on Flickr
Is there much difference between the British Harvard and the US Harvard?
The ‘American’ ‘Harvard’ (or SNJ in US Navy Service) never served in those colo(u)rs, and was only ever technically American 🙂
http://www.t6harvard.com/Harvard%20History/G-BUKY%20History/gbukyhistory.html
And the ‘British’ one is also in disguise!
http://www.t6harvard.com/Harvard%20History/G-BJST%20Harvard%20History/gbjsthistory.html
I had no idea they were still making them in the 50’s!
Some discussion by Aussie academic Brett Holman on Waiting for Hitler: Voices from Britain on the Brink of Invasion by Midge Gillies
http://airminded.org/2008/01/26/the-day-of-the-parashot/
One of the aspects of Waiting for Hitler I appreciated was Gillies’ attention to rumours and panics as an index of the insecurity of the British people as they prepared for a possible German invasion. These are fascinating. For example, the slit trenches being dug in Hyde Park were said to be for mass burials in the aftermath of air raids, not protection from bombs. Troops practicing machine-gunning a buoy in a Cornish harbour turned into the accidental death of a boy by machine-gun fire the next day, and then the massacre of dozens of children on the beach the next, strafed by German aeroplanes.
JZA said..Stars could include RE2, SE5A, camel, Hind, Gladiator, Blenheim, Spits, Hurricanes, Lancaster, Dakota, Meteor, Canberra, Hunter, Vulcan, Harrier (c/o US marines ) Phantom, Tornado, Typhoon, Hawk. Hercules etc
Good list and we might have another Lancaster flying by then.
Borrow a Snipe replica to slot in-between Camel and Hind
This one? http://s56.photobucket.com/user/gavsgt/media/gavsgt117/65464645_zps9cf0986f.jpg.html
Nope, and I didn’t bother giving a direct link, as I figured people wouldn’t mind a quick scroll past a dozen airshow shots from a world-class photographer.
I muffed getting a shot of the Saturday bombing, but there is a good photo from Gavin Conroy (who’s work has been in and on Flypast recently) in this Wings Over NZ forum post.
http://rnzaf.proboards.com/post/221909/thread
He didn’t do too badly, I will try for impact (and hopefully pyro) shots today.
Great work!
Over twenty years of work,and the team who rebuilt Black 6 knew she would only fly for a few years. The desert and Mediterranean theaters are woefully unrepresented at Hendon.
Yes, I’m glad that one of the NZ Spitfires is in a North Africa scheme.
75 (NZ) Squadron definitely wanted to get rid of their Stirlings, there are high-level memos about it!
I would guess at first that may be the case and then maybe the end happened too quick for them to get that bad feeling BUT i would think that after a while you realised the odds were getting lower and lower [although in hindsight experience would increase your chances to a degree ] .The power of youth and optimism,but that can only last so long.
Didn’t someone fairly recently work out that experience had very little or no measurable effect on Bomber Command loss rates on operations?
Which makes sense if you never get to see the NF putting 30mm shells into your belly.
If I had been a Swordfish pilot sent against the Bismark I would have become ‘uncertain of my position’ very early on.
The difference between WW2 bravery and modern day self-preservation I guess?
Moggy
from “Bring Back my Stringbag” by Lord Kilbracken, 1979
“…Brian with his DSO ribbon was one of the few survivors of that suicidal
attack by Eugene Esmonde’s squadron on the S&G only a few months earlier.
Elegant and suave, he still had 18 bits of shrapnel in his back, which the
doctors preferred to leave there, and a newly acquired stammer, but was
already thought fit to return to action.”
It has been said that the reason no Swordfish were shot down during the attack was because the guns on the Bismarck could not compensate for an aircraft flying so slowly.
I would like to challenge this assumption.
…
I seem to remember reading an extensive debunking of this somewhere, but a quick Google didn’t find it.
I did find this interesting discussion http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=65
Unfortunately some of the most interesting points are unreferenced.
Some points made there:
The main problem was that the after port and starboard batteries were controlled primarily by the two after directors which in the case of Bismarck, were unstabilized, twin axis directors installed as a stopgap measure until the proper ones could be manufactured and fitted. The German government, in keeping to its obligations under the Soviet-German trade agreement, had provided the Russians with four of their most modern FlaK directors–the two after ones from Bismarck, and the two foreward ones from Prinz Eugen. Thus Bismarck and Prinz Eugen each went to sea with a pair of inferior directors which were not fully integrated into the FlaK fire control system. Prinz Eugen later received two fully stabilized triaxis directors to replace those sent to the USSR, while Tirpitz was completed with hers.
The inspection of the Flak was ccut short in protest of the AVKS, they were incomplete, large portions were cancelled, i.e, the Flak crew did not receive proper training training such as the 38 cm crews did, though even their training, according to the AVKS, was not adequate due to instrumentation still uninstalled and poor targets construction etc.
I think you will discover that most of the swordfish attacks were launched in deep twilight or even nautical darkness. Roskill states that the 1st attack commenced at midnight on the 25th of may. The 2nd, crippling attack commenced at 20:47 on the 26th of may. No swordfish were shot down because the gunners were probably blinded by by the flash of thier guns and/or because it was simply too dark to locate the aircraft.
For the record I think it should be remembered that while none of the Swordfish were lost it certainly wasn’t the case that they were not hit by German fire
Just a few Globemaster II’s
[ATTACH=CONFIG]234028[/ATTACH]
Nicked from http://rnzaf.proboards.com/thread/22379/usn-usaf-aircraft-wigram-christchurch