dark light

MarkG

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 718 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1257571
    MarkG
    Participant

    Hi Mark
    How much are you asking for your panel have you any pics
    Regards Haggers:eek:

    Have sent you a PM.

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1260086
    MarkG
    Participant

    Cheers Dave
    ANY IDEAS WHERE I CAN GET MY HANDS ON ONE?
    ::eek:

    I’ve got an unrestored Canberra B.2 panel available for sale if interested?

    in reply to: Redhill Aerojumble Saturday 22nd September #1265091
    MarkG
    Participant

    I take it the “possible” September Shoreham aerojumble is a goner?

    in reply to: Torbay Aircraft Museum #1267803
    MarkG
    Participant

    Wasn’t it owned and/or operated by some film or TV actor? I’ll have to go back to my records and see what they reveal.

    Keith Fordyce, a DJ and TV presenter.

    in reply to: Hunter newbie questions #1274292
    MarkG
    Participant

    I have developed a liking for the hunter

    Good choice!

    The Hunter’s ‘drop tanks’ come in two capacities – a 100 gallon version (recognisable by the small fins on the rear end) and a 230 gallon version which was not jettisonable.

    The Swiss Hunters were retired in 1995, about the same time that the last Hunter GA.11s were retired from RN (actually FRADU) service.

    in reply to: Spitfire Replica, alternative spars, etc. #1306618
    MarkG
    Participant

    MarkG; You could be right about the hammering expanding the metal, and adding to my woes. But, don’t forget, the largest part of the edge “puckering” is that the web of the fuselage frame is curved, not straight. This automatically causes wrinkling on the outer flange once it’s bent 90 degrees. You can’t avoid it. Try it with paper, which is not compressible, on a curved section, and you’ll see what I mean.

    Tom, yes I know exactly what you mean, it’s just that I didn’t explain myself very well! The point I was trying to make was that you can get that curving effect even on a straight bend in a straight piece of metal if the bend is made by hammering too far over in small sections. This stretches the metal locally whereas if the whole bend is made in one go, e.g. using a folder, then it doesn’t happen. Sorry for confusing the issue!

    in reply to: Spitfire Replica, alternative spars, etc. #1307364
    MarkG
    Participant

    The only remaining mystery is straightening the slightly backward-curved web of each frame, which happens when I hammer bend the outer and inner flanges 90 degrees.

    Tom, I believe this happens because the process of hammering the flange over stretches the metal in the flange slightly. Thus the side of the flange furthest from the bend becomes slightly longer than the side closest to the bend. That extra length has to ‘go’ somewhere so the whole frame lakes on a slight curve.

    It’s worse if the flange is formed in small sections at a time, e.g. if a short section is hammered over to an appreciable angle, then another section, then another section etc., rather than adding a very small increment to the bend angle over the whole length of the frame before starting over again and adding further small increments. For example, if you were putting a 90 degree angle on a straight piece of metal in a sheet metal folder, you’d make the whole bend in one operation – hence no localised, longitudinal stretching and no backward curve. However, if you were to hammer that same bend a section at a time, the metal would stretch slightly and a curve would result.

    The trick to reducing this effect is, as mentioned above, to work in very small bend increments over the whole length of the piece. Repeat that until the full bend is achieved. You can also use wooden blocks to add bend angle to as long a section as the shape of the piece will allow in one go.

    Unfortunately, I can’t see a way of removing the unwanted curve in a frame once it’s there, because you would be trying to compress the stretched metal back into itself. The key is not to allow it to develop in the first place, or at least to minimise it.

    That’s my theory anyway!

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1307378
    MarkG
    Participant

    If using Nitromors then brush it on so there’s a good couple of mm thickness all over, leave for around 20 minutes then scrape it off with a stripping tool. That should shift most of the old paint. Then you can brush on thinner layers to get rid of any remainder. Repeat as necessary then give it a good wash in water to remove the remains of the Nitromors before cleaning with thinners and Scotchbrite as mentioned.

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1308128
    MarkG
    Participant

    LOL

    Three ways and they are all right!

    You can never get a straight answer ’round ‘ere can you? 😀

    in reply to: Aircraft Instrument Panel Projects #1308331
    MarkG
    Participant

    Cliff,

    If it’s any help this is my own method for repainting instrument panels like this.

    As Bruce says, strip with Nitromors then thoroughly clean the bare metal with White Spirit and a Scotchbrite pad then dry with paper towels. I prefer to prime the metal with an acid-etch primer. Some Halfords stores sell “U-Pol” acid-etch which is great stuff but not always stocked for some reason. Failing that, I too have had generally good results with Halford’s own Grey Primer.

    However, my preferred option is to use a coat of Halford’s “Filler Primer” either over etch-primer or even directly onto the metal. This filler primer is a little thicker, and so hides some of the scratches in the metal and is yellow which often looks a more authentic colour showing through the inevitable chips that the edges of the panel will pick up.

    Now this is where I disagree with Bruce (sorry Bruce!). I speak predominantly from experience of Hunters, but I think it applies equally to other 1950s jets – I always use Halford’s Matt Black for the final coat and nothing else. Originally, the intention was to eliminate as many sources of potential reflection on the inside of the canopy from items inside the cockpit as possible. That’s why everything was matt black, the matter the better – even screw heads were painted over with matt black after instruments etc. were installed. Some of the original paint on items in my Hunter are amazingly matt, more so than I’ve been easily able to replicate. In my opinion Halford’s Satin is way too glossy. Their Matt has a very, very slight ‘sheen’ to it but seems about the best and most consistent I’ve used, having tried several different brands.

    So, for what it’s worth, my advice for 1950s era panels is strip > clean > acid-etch > Halford’s yellow Filler-Primer > Halford’s Matt Black, then fill in the lettering with white (or Eau-de-Nil for Hawker stuff). If you can resist the temptation to start whacking the instruments back in (difficult I know!) then it’s worth waiting a good few days for the paint to cure before doing much more. It’ll be much harder are chip-resistant by then.

    If in doubt, prime up a bit of scrap aluminium and try both the Matt and Satin and see which matches your original panel the closest.

    Good luck!

    in reply to: Believed to be from… a B-17 ? #1309117
    MarkG
    Participant
    in reply to: STIRLING PART? #1313092
    MarkG
    Participant

    Can anyone confirm that these rudder pedals carry the correct part number for the Short Stirling please.

    Ref Number S25E5004. 254 FR.

    With kind regards – Malcolm.

    You referring to these by any chance?

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=140144872499&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=004

    in reply to: Attention Spitfire builders… #1317627
    MarkG
    Participant

    Then why put “SPITFIRE???” in the listing title?

    http://pages.ebay.co.uk/help/policies/keyword-spam.html

    The amount of ‘Spitfire’ stuff on eBay is astonishing!

    in reply to: Top Flight? #1318424
    MarkG
    Participant

    That wouldn’t be HIGH FLIGHT rather than Top Flight would it? With Ray Milland and Bernard Lee? If so then it was filmed at RAF Cranwell I believe in 1957 or 58 or thereabouts.

    I’ve only ever seen it once but I remember flying scenes being wonderful.

    I don’t suppose anyone knows where/how I can get a copy? Been trying for ages but it doesn’t seem to ever have been released on VHS let alone DVD.:(

    MarkG
    Participant

    I’m 100% with Arthur on this.

    Me too.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 718 total)