My bits…
Beechcraft D.18s G-BKRN (Texantomcat)
BAC Lightning 53-671/ZF579 (mjr)
Blackburn Buccaneer S.2B XX889 (Buccsociety)
Boeing B-17 Cockpit section-reproduction (B-17man)
Boeing B-17 Radio room-reproduction (B-17man)
Consolidated B-24 Cockpit section-reproduction (B-17man)
de Havilland Hornet F.MK.1 Cockpit/Forward fuselage – reproduction (dcollins103)
de Havilland Vampire FB.MK.5 Cockpit – VZ193 (dcollins103)
de Havilland Vampire T. Mk 11 XD599 (Texantomcat)
de Havilland Vampire T.11 XE985 pod (MarkG)
de Havilland Vampire T. Mk 11 XH313 (Vampire)
English Electric Canberra PR.9 Nose/cockpit XH175 (RossMcNeill)
English Electric/BAC Lightning F.3 XP706 (Scott C)
Handley Page Halifax B Mk III cockpit reproduction (HP57)
Hawker Hurricane (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F1 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F2 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F6 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter T7 XL591 (mjr)
Hawker Hunter FGA.78 QA12 nose/cockpit (MarkG)
Hawker Typhoon Cockpit (Rocketeer)
Miles Messenger M.2a G-AKIN (Rocketeer)
North American AT-6-D-1-NT Texan G-TOMC (Texantomcat)
Supermarine Spitfire Cockpit (Rocketeer)
Supermarine Swift F7 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
English Electric Canberra T4 WT486 nose/cockpit (sniperUK,2241sqn ATC)
Hi all
I will be exhibiting two de Havilland instrument panels this year in the interiors category only. Would anyone be interested in bringing along other de Havilland instrument panel types to show a line up?
I would like to display:
Hornet F.1 instrument panel.
Vampire FB.5, instrument panel from VZ193.Does anyone have one for a Moth, Rapide, Mosquito, Chipmunk, Vampire T.11, Venom, Sea Venom, etc? This could make an interesting mini-theme for the interiors section?
David, as discussed I should be able to arrange a Vampire T.11 and Mosquito B.35 if all goes to plan. There’s a fair bit of work to be done yet but I should have something to bring along. 🙂
Hmm. Needs a bit of TLC for sure, but is certainly restorable and Canberra parts are definately out there.
Mmmmmmmmm……Lara Croft…………. :rolleyes:
Tiny shorts, skin-tight top, great big…er…boots………. :diablo:
Nurse!
And there was me thinking we were talking about preserving a nose section, not reducing it to produce in order to make a profit…!
That’s exactly what we are talking about. But you can’t be seriously suggesting that it be worth only £200 “as is” when there’s 500 quids worth of Martin Baker’s finest still inside it? :confused:
Trouble is with a Vulcan there’s more to it than just cost. It’s probably the most awkward cockpit section to deal with and certainly isn’t for the beginner or faint-hearted!. The sheer size is the first consideration and it’ll need to be elevated on a decent frame before you can even get inside to begin work. That needs a lot of cash to build and a lot of space to put it in which makes it a pretty specialised ‘cockpitting’ job.
Regarding the cost, I think Bruce is absolutely right. Given what’s left in the cockpit, albeit a bit ‘tatty’, and the rarity of the type it’s probably not such a bad asking price after all. Heck, there’s probably getting on for 400-500 quids worth of seats in there for starters.
West TV news last night reported on this. Unlike the Sun’s sensationalism they interviewed a sensible Filton Concorde maintenance chap who said it’s simply an old repair which has come adrift. It’ll still need that section of metal replacing however but isn’t a general indication of the state of the rest of the airframe.
If this, relatively minor, incident highlights the plight of this Concorde and speeds up getting it undercover, then so much the better. In my opinion if there’s going to be a properly preserved Concorde anywhere, it should be at Filton.
Nice to see some new stuff but the statement is not strictly true as David Burke’s Buccaneer was a visitor in 2002.
As good as this project undoubtedly is, it looks a little odd around the canopy.
The canopy does indeed look a bit strange, and the Canberra nose glazing makes the nose look odd too.
Having said that though, this is a wonderful project and it would be a desperate, crying shame if it was wasted and the replica broken up. My congratulations go to the builder on his achievement and the very best of luck in finding a new home for it.
There’s a diagram on the Stirling Project’s website which shows the retraction sequence. It’s a bit too small to see the detail but it’s better than ‘nowt.
Click http://www.stirlingproject.co.uk/ and look in Newsletter No.5
Anyone ID the Canberra flying escort?
Canberra T.22 WH797
3 pics from my collection
Thanks for sharing. Here’s 3 from my collection…
Fathers Day weekend was to give Fathers the chance to say why not go here….nice idea I think.
I personally don’t believe a conscious decision to hold CockpitFest on Father’s Day was ever made for that reason. It’s just turned out that way, on the majority of occasions, because that was the weekend that best fitted the museum’s schedule. That’s the gist of what Bill told me anyway and, as Stuart has said, I don’t think he has a lot of say in those decisions.
I also don’t believe the “it’s Father’s Day, let’s take Dad to CockpitFest” thing is any attraction. In 2004 it was held on a different weekend and it was one, if not the best ‘Fest of all, both in terms of attending displays and visitors.
I am desperate for the CockpitFest event to continue and develop, but it’s only as good as the cockpits attending and there’s only a limited number of potential attendees. Because of that any possible, proven obstacle to the attendance of displays should be addressed. As I said, I know for certain that there was at least one excellent cockpit display missing last year purely because it was Father’s Day weekend. 682al’s comments in another thread about having to place his control column display in another area away from his aerojumble stall also needs to be addressed. Having to choose between the two, because of the difficulty in supervising two locations, he has decided to go with the stall rather than the display and I fully understand that. It does mean that the inflexibility of the position at the museum has denied us an excellent exhibit however, which is a great shame.
Maybe we’ll have to agree to disagree on this, but I certainly think it’s food for thought.
To be honest I’m not especially bothered about having a ‘theme’. I’m only interested in attracting as many cockpits and with as much variety as possible.
My only suggestion last year was not to hold it on Father’s Day weekend. I know there were cockpiters who didn’t attend (and who certainly would have otherwise) because they had family considerations that weekend. Unfortunately it’s on Father’s Day weekend again this year so that’s that. It also clashes with Kemble Air Day every year. 🙁
I think he’s been keeping this quite… :diablo:
…but check out Mark G’s ongoing Hunter nose restoration.
Clicky HERE
I never realised you could cut a Hunter into sooo many bits 😮
People keep asking why I haven’t taken it to CockpitFest – well now you can see why! Until recently I would have had to take it in a formation of shoe-boxes! 😀