Yes. That’s why, apart for the RCS reduction (that could equally have been applied to the C/D), there was no reason reasonably to add that much fuel and catch the Raf/Typhoon where they don’t sale much. Keeping the small airframe would have allowed to crush all cost with that amount of Avionics performance.
As a result (every pots can’t hold more than their full) the E is pushed on the market at a snail pace with, what seems to me, a lower engineering level than the earlier iterations.
“Due to vast economies of scale, all countries will achieve significant reductions on the price of their jets,” [Joe DellaVedova, a spokesman for the F-35 program office] said in a statement to Military.com. “The $80-85 million number often referenced for the cost of an F-35A in 2019 — is right in the middle of the expected block buy.”
How would you say “temptations” in Hindi?
Probably..? So a Rafale, Growler or F-35 would have half of the world cell phone up in the clouds, just a few sec from a radio signal is detect and a little upload/download and badabingbadabong, gottcha!!
LMAO!! Riiiight.
All MODELS of cellphone. You are not tuning your cellphone hardware usually…
Australia parliament recommendation for F35s:
Recommendation 2
6.19 The committee recommends that the Department of Defence develop a sovereign industrial capability strategy for the F-35A to ensure that Australian aircraft can be maintained and supported without undue reliance on other nations.Recommendation 3
6.20 The committee recommends that the government endeavour to establish Australia as the Asia-Pacific maintenance and sustainment hub for the F-35.
Full doc available here (as sourced from DefAerospace.com)
Don’t forget that all civilian cellphone have probably their emissions characterized, registered and classified in a shared database.
They make it a Gov to Gov diplomatic thing! Crazy times.
On a lighter note, I found another reason why the Poles ran away so fast:
Airbus had also hoped to pitch its Tiger attack helicopter […] to the Polish services
!!
Found today in AvWeek, originally from J. bezos:
“Gradatim Ferociter”—step by step, ferociously.
2 french militaries from my former unit were badly injured (near Erbil), one very seriously by such an item few days ago.
Sorry to hear such. I very much know some design that would have prevented this and be ready long ago if not plagued by stupidity and greed.
It has a lot to do with being able to scale up Tejas assembly quickly. HAL now states that it wants to be an integrator, like Boeing and wants to out-source the bulk of the production to private sector companies in order to be able to ramp up to 20-25 Tejas fighters per year.
local-production-of-us-f-16-f/a-18-not-attractive-hal-chairman-suvarna-raju
Frankly, it would have helped a lot if you had cited the very first lines of that report in understanding those awkward comments:
In an interview with ET, Raju reveals that the government has cleared the new Light Combat Helicopter for export and talks are on with at least two nations.
So, good luck HAL and India. But they should know that the Uber-rhetoric does not help much in military sales 😉
And by the way, how a mini-fighter with a powerful engines declined on a Ski-jump version, fielding an Aesa and an impressive array of weapons can be a failure? I am stunned by how weird are the analysis of some.
Small Improvised Explosive Drones now a reality
Of the three known drone attacks in Iraq, only the one involving the Kurdish soldiers caused casualties. “The explosive device inside was disguised as a battery — there was a very small amount of explosives in it, but it was enough to go off and kill them,”
Source:
The New York Times.com
Absolutely. A paper aircraft can alway beat any one flying.
???
you are on your own (as it seems). B/w same link.
Also, I mentionned “Puma derivatives” wich includes de-facto all the Puma/Super Puma and H2xx deribatives(I hate those new denomination).
thanks. Nice one.
But they are more LERX than canards.