One of the officials cited above, who requested anonymity, said the initial investigation points to a pilot error as the jets were flying in an “incorrect formation” while performing the mirror manoeuvre.
In a mirror manoeuvre, it appears to spectators on the ground that one jet in the formation is flying inverted exactly above the other. But the planes in reality have to maintain minimum lateral separation to eliminate chances of a collision.
“It is a very tight formation. But the pilots have to maintain a minimum lateral separation. It appears the jets did not maintain that separation that day. The Hawk flying below the inverted plane should not have been exactly under it,” the second official said, also on condition of anonymity.
The jet flying below had two pilots in it. A single pilot flew the inverted one above. Footage of the collision showed that the aircraft on top descended rapidly with its nose crashing into the tail of the jet below before snapping off into pieces.
Wing Commander Sahil Gandhi, who was flying the inverted jet, was killed in the crash. The two injured pilots in the other plane ejected and parachuted to the ground.
The crash of a U.S. Marine Corps F-35 that temporarily grounded the entire fleet of next-generation jets in 2018 was caused by a manufacturing defect in a fuel tube made by a United Technologies subcontractor, according to congressional investigators.
Source:
Bloomberg.com
They could have mounted the Canon in the cargo bay on the rear. Would have been more efficient (à la Bronco – think minigun).
Great observation [USER=”7429″]Scorpion82[/USER]. But I think it’s the offset angle and the arrow on teh number 8 is the sensor range setting. Given also the “target” seems to react to the “lock”, we probably have a slew sensor (target is locked by the radar that pass its coordinates to the sensor).
The USAF is standing up an Aggressor Unit manned with 11x F-35s. They will arrive in 2022 at Nellis AFB (Hello Red Flag).
They are going to use early Lot jets from Eglin AFB.
9 jets would cover most of Lots 2 & 3 (6 & 7 F-35As respectively) plus an additional 2 from an unknown source gets to the 11.
It makes so much sense. Great move!
20y after hard procurement all across the military spectrum to cut time from sensor to shooter, we are greeted by Opit’s conclusions. Ahhh to live a live meaningful…
SH, Rafale and Gripen have the edge in recce capabilites thanks to their dedicated recce pods – but I don’t think the Swiss AF asks for more than RecceLite etc. can deliver.
I understand that you want to appease the debate but this stands as an astounding assumption. Do you really think that F-35 fusion comes in a tea spoon? (that one as an “in” in front :rolleyes: ).
Last Libyan GNA Mirage F-1 shotdown and Pilot (Portuguese mecenary) captured by the LNA
It is reported that again an aircraft (most probably a Mirage F1) is shot down over Libya.
This time a Government of National Accord (GNA) aircraft was probably hit over Al Hira and crashed in a remote area on 7 May 2019. If it was indeed a Mirage F1, this could be the final F1 of GNA inventory.
It is said (so unconfirmed!) that the mercenary pilot – with a Portuguese nationality – ejected safely but was captured by the Libyan National Army (LNA) who claimed to have hit the most probably Mirage F1.
The Libyan National Army (LNA), led by Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, released video footage on Tuesday of a man in bloodied clothes.
Under questioning, he identifies himself as a 29-year-old Portuguese national working as a contractor.
The LNA, which is battling rival militias loosely allied with a UN-supported government, says it shot the pilot’s plane down over the capital earlier Monday.
Source:
Scramble Magazine on FB
https://gulfnews.com/world/mena/liby….1557301610761“]Gulfnews.com[/url]
Achtung, SpitFiper!
[ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:t59566774_2782920585067791_1168527826622611456_n.jpg Views:t0 Size:t131.3 KB ID:t3861731″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3861731″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”59566774_2782920585067791_1168527826622611456_n.jpg”}[/ATTACH]
Source:
Scramble Magazine on FB
A nice review of the work done on the Mirage F-1 before their transfer to SABCA in Belgium where they are refitted for their final client in the US (in Fr but illustrated).
A l’ATAC! La seconde vie des Mirage F1 de Châteaudun
[ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:t1243936211.jpg Views:t0 Size:t37.8 KB ID:t3861722″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3861722″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”1243936211.jpg”}[/ATTACH]
Pfff. Demleteris is based in Viroflay. Near Paris. Pierre Duval phone number is a +33, absolutely french.
Batard partners is only managing experts pool
All is here (discussed already):
https://forum.keypublishing.com/forum/modern-military-aviation/3842831-the-great-aircraft-bazaar-french-donated-airframes-since-2017
the price is fairly known outside of Texas as is the the weird usage of a French Independent intermediary based in… Switzerland.
Ok OPIT, OK :sleeping:
No, Opit, you are wrong. Maybe that lowering a bit your disdain for any critics might help your logic (if you have any).
Here are the direct value for 2015
[ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tcpfh2015_USAF.png Views:t0 Size:t476.9 KB ID:t3861457″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3861457″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”cpfh2015_USAF.png”}[/ATTACH]
And a nice read on the subject (From Greece that has shown its interest for F-35s): https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/5/4/1…date&version=1
Notice also that CPFH is directly (suffice to say) correlated to hours really flown by the airframe; a simple adjustment variable that today enjoys a renewed focus from various services.
Fairly stupid way to think. conversion in 2019 of 27000 is less than 30000 etc.
you don’t like to feel wrong do you?
If you want to compare, take F-35 cpfh in 2013.
you have to compare what is comparable in line with the objects to be compared… Since your assumption was to oppose CPFH of the Rafale with that of an US airframe using a 2013 reference, the first thing is to use the proper conversion ratio (2013 exchange rate) and then add the inflation parameter (2013 US$ to 2019 US$).
There is no correct way to do otherwise. Sorry if the Math sound “anti-French” to you :rolleyes: