dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2100707
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Exiting times that we live:

    It’s premature to talk dollars, [Army Secretary, Marc] Esper replied. “Whether we help fund that at some point, I don’t know, I’m not going to talk about that right now,” he said. “My comment was only we need aircraft in the future that can do that heavy vertical lift movement, but can … survive in a very contested airspace and keep up with the FARAs and FLRAAs.”

    Source:
    Breaking Defense.com

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2100709
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Conversion of 2013€ to 2013$: 27000€ (2013) = 35600$ (2013)
    Conversion 2013$ to 2019$: 38800$

    So 27k€ in 2013 for the Rafale equate 39000$ CPFH (higher than an F-15)

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2100779
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Well, this is a Saab thread.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2100801
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Even if they have to manufacture in the US, it doesn’t mean that this would not impact their workforce in Sweden. A significant part of their staff (including operators) will have to be relocated (temporary or on more longer term) there to sustain the production activities. The only case where this would not happen is if they had gone through a local subcontractor. Think that they have Saab manufacturing methods, proprietary content and their own set of administrative rules for example.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2100876
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    They have roughly 30% of every T-X to manufacture. I don’t think that they will be short of work for their current manpower anytime soon. Better fill a contract than raising production cost by playing the yo-yo with their workforce.
    Freezing production activity has been the motto of Dassault under the Trappier era and it has proved to be an overall disaster.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2101028
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    regarding the above linked video, see also here: https://www.defensenews.com/smr/global-strike/

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101435
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    The increase to $428.4 billion from $406.2 billion in acquisition costs, about a 5.5 percent increase, isn’t due to poor performance, delays or excessive costs for labor or materials, according to the Defense Department’s latest Selected Acquisition Report sent to Congress last week and obtained by Bloomberg News.

    Instead, the increase reflects for the first time the current cost estimates for a major set of upgrades planned in coming “Block 4” modifications, according to the repor

    Source:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-22/lockheed-s-costly-f-35-to-be-billions-costlier-pentagon-finds

    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2101437
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Video: Towbar Fails As A U.S. Marine Corps CH-53 Super Stallion Is Being Loaded Onto A Ship

    As it seems they failed to secure the towbar with a safety chain (could it be the one used to link both tractors?)

    Source:
    The Aviationist.com

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2101467
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    So the deal doesn’t include any increased thrust for the M88?

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101565
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    The F-35 has superior roll rate characteristics with axis centered masses and small wing’s span. Given that at high roll rate forward distribution of weight and drag is also detrimental (excursion in yaw due to inertia), the short nosed/ axially centered mass/no canards F-35 is perfect in that domain (think also A-4). I am surprised that some are looking for potential flaws in that domain…

    b/w thanks for the video FBW. Really interesting.

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2101571
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    The remark is valid: wasn’t the 88 improvement in thrusts already implemented in the Indian deal?

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2101603
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Instead of running after 1980’s TVC tech they should do the jump directly to fluidic vectoring and distributed propulsion (outlets). Much more bang for the buck.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101823
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    The point is the apparent discrepancy in execution quality b/w the Japanese line and that at LM. The F-35 test flight and early phase has been remarkable for its absence of crash. If we admit that today hundreds of F-35 fly everyday, accumulating hours by the many, this second crash constitute a spike in probability that constitute an anomaly. Hence, why many don’t see this as a normal occurrence.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2101933
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Japan’s fleet of F-35s reportedly made 7 emergency landings before crash

    [LIST]
    [*]Five of Japan Air Self-Defense Force’s F-35 jets reportedly made seven emergency landings prior to a crash somewhere in the Pacific Ocean last week, according to the Japanese newspaper Mainichi Shimbun.
    [*]The emergency landings occurred in flight tests between June 2017 and January 2019, The Mainichi reported, citing defense officials.
    [*]The crashed F-35, which was assembled by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Nagoya, Japan, was reportedly diagnosed with cooling and navigation system problems in June 2017 and August 2018.
    [*]Four of the five F-35s with problems were also assembled by Mitsubishi.

    [/LIST]
    Source:
    This is insider.com

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2101936
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    https://www.flightglobal.com/assets/getasset.aspx?itemid=77127

    From FlightGlobal.com

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 5,621 total)