dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Iran update: J-10, MiG-35 or Rafale? #2164395
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Sure you do.. Dynamically, the FC-1 is at least on par, with the economics of the engine being a league ahead.. Add limited airframe life left and general unavailability of French hardware to Iran and you can start dragging your F1EQs to the scrapyard right away.

    I am sorry but when we will see a 17 at mach1 hugging ground or a FC1 matching the time to climb to 40kft of the Mirage, I might agree with you.
    It’s an old timer, yes, but among the products of the new entrants in the industry (17, 10 or Teja), it still has teeth.

    This is why I wrote that it does not make sense to replace it with a jf17/FC1. Obsolescence and remaining lifetime can be treated more economically (in theory).

    A squadron of F1 carrying a modernized Exocet would be a serious threat to the world economy for example. I do not see an FC1 having such impact (bold example).

    Then if Iran did not have any F1, my answer would have been diametrically different.

    in reply to: Iran update: J-10, MiG-35 or Rafale? #2164488
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Yes, you are right. See my remark as more rhetorical than an analysis of the Iranian situation.

    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2164492
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Spanish Air Force AS 332 Super Puma search-and-rescue (SAR) helicopter crashed.

    Crew safe after Spanish helicopter crash

    one of the crewmen has now survived two Super Puma crashes in as many years, having been the sole survivor of a crash off the Canary Islands in March 2014 that killed four.

    !

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2164497
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Is Canadian air defence policy credible?

    it could be possible to have a less costly replacement such as the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet or Dassault Rafale

    I have a hard time understanding how the later can be deemed less expensive. Export prices history does not concur to make it a fact.

    in reply to: USN F-18 crashes near RAF RAF Lakenheath #2164602
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Do we know why the rest of the squadron didn’t land in the same airport? I read they were re-routed in Scotland. Does it means that it was an in-flight failure deemed minor that didn’t seem urgent to be de-routed with his wingman?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2164607
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Maybe that someone smells a risk with India taking Can prod lot (35)?

    in reply to: Iran update: J-10, MiG-35 or Rafale? #2164611
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    For me first thing obtain an extra 20 SU-24’s plus spares for them and currant fleet . second try and put together a deal to build 120 JF-17’s in house to replace Mirage F-1, F-7,F-5 and Saeqeh . Thirdly if the money is there do a deal for 80 SU-30MK to replace F-4 and F-14s other things that will need looking at will be a C-130 replacement new attack helicopters new mid- heavy lift helicopters

    You don’t replace a Mirage F1 with a JF17. Dynamically its performances are still the best of the two and with a cheap upgrade its systems will certain outmatch that of the later. Add training, spare etc.. And This would be money lost for nothing

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2165089
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    They are fixing it with MB paying for all the fixes. because that was the spec.

    There was only a single male pilot that was affected and he has since changed MOSs even thought he was given a custom version of the helmet that was lighter than the standard one that alleviated the risk.

    Acceleration such as the ones acting on the body of the pilots during ejection are not that polite to enclose themselves in rigid limits. It’s not because you limit the weight of who is in the seat that you’ve cancels the problem. A dissymmetrical position or a slight deviation from the initial parameters might put you back in the danger zone. The weight limitation is a temporary restriction acceptable at initial cap (I presume). Not something you want to see when thousands of aircraft are flying (probability laws).

    The roots of the problem are serious (pitch attitude control for example). It does need a sgnificant redesign of the seat. And I am not sure that airbag will alleviate this without bringing in even more complication as their experience suggests.

    The question is: how are other air forces doing? What are the other aircraft manufacturer offering that kind of helmet have done to prevent this problem?

    in reply to: Aviation set back 20 years when we didnt build the B-70 #2165514
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Actually there was a “B71” or more precisely a B12 bomber project. The project might even have been more serious at LM SkWrk than the YF12.
    The complexity yielded in such an equation (medium size fast cruise, safety carriage of nukes, long range and targeting systems ) was too much at the time or too less in achievable performances in regards to what was already on the tarmacs (B58). Even in the 90’s (30 years latter) it seems to have been a harsh goal (see the FB22/23) on a cost effective way.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2165542
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Hollow charge? On a MANPAD? AFAIK they’ve got fragmentation warheads, no?

    Edit: Most have a dual effect warheads with a directed blast (I guess you were referring to this) and fragmentation effects, but I’m not sure if they’re actually commonly referred as “shaped charge” which is commonly used to describe the HEAT weapons where a thin jet is formed (which is not exactly the effect you’d want against aircraft).

    Yes, shaped charge. My mistake.
    The explosion seems to have been directed backward (toward the tip of the missile), suggesting a detonation by the collapse of the rocket casing penetrated by the front section.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2165635
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    I thought it looked like cluster munitions as the explosions were rather small, scattered and numerous rather than heavy missile strikes which produce a much bigger smoke column.

    The Mi-8 shot is interesting. Apparently the missile went straight for the engine. I’d expect the crew have extinguished the fire and switched off the engine because, as tiny as those warheads are, the explosion looked dead on and there was some trailing smoke afterwards (or perhaps it’s the extinguisher vapors?). Lucky crew for sure.

    Some newer variants have added armor protection for the engines, but I didn’t see any reports of Syria receiving them. There’s also the possibility that they might have been added recently as a field mod by the Russians given the significant losses to MANPADs?

    Seems to me that the missile exploded on impact without any hollow charge gizmo activated (hence the bright orange fireball). Perhaps this was due to either a missile malfunction or the effect of an active counter measure.

    I guess that the A10 in Turkey will see some action quite soon.

    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Trudeau has explicitly stated that he opposes the F-35 and will seek “more affordable” fighters.

    But what is most affordable frankly? Teja, Mig29, straight out of the Line SH (not improved/enhanced)?

    Dancing is great, but at least, one day or another, you’ll have to let your feet touch the ground. This run out of the F35 is irrational.

    TomcatViP
    Participant

    isn’t acceptable, say who? From where?

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2166097
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Warplanes hit Libyan city of Sirte, target Islamic State

    government have bombed Islamist militants in the past. But an official was not immediately available to comment on the Sirte attack.

    Source:
    Reuters.com

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2166350
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Photos of Su-30 parked in a new reinforced concrete bay at Latakia. Settling in for the long haul? Are there any recent satellite images of the airbase to show developments?

    https://mobile.twitter.com/MuradoRT/status/656112742705836032

    Can’t see any red stars.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,331 through 3,345 (of 5,621 total)