OMG another Don Quichotte slaying the incredulous on the web…
Be my guest to give details where I was selective or Forget all about me. Thanks in advance.
If that was the following quote you think I irrelevantly hide,
Airbus said that all of the A400M’s other systems performed normally and the flight data recorders “did not identify any other abnormalities throughout the flight”.
please note that all aircraft that have crashed in the past due to a technical failure had their “other system perform[ing] normally“. Sry if I over-zealously cut the dumb part of that Airbus PR material (you can find that weird sentence in most of the press report).
Pentagon request more Russian’rocket engines
In a letter to senior lawmakers dated May 11, the secretary of defense, Ashton B. Carter, and the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., said the Pentagon would face “significant challenges” to ensuring access to space for the most delicate military and intelligence missions if the ban on the Russian engines remained in place.
This position is backed by Boeing and LM
Energomash, the Russian company that makes the rocket engines, emerged from the old Soviet space program and formed a partnership with Lockheed Martin in the early 1990s to develop new technologies. It was a time when the United States sought to foster cooperation in space, in part to discourage the proliferation of rocket technology to countries that American officials viewed warily.
Along with Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney, Energomash adapted the RD-180 rocket engine for use in the Atlas series of rockets now made by the Lockheed Martin-Boeing alliance. The engine has been used in 54 launches of the latest version, the Atlas V, for commercial, NASA and military missions. In a statement, the United Launch Alliance called the RD-180 “a technologically advanced and reliable engine.”
Any early decision could shape the competition (b/w SpaceX and United Alliance (Bo/LM))
The debate now is over how many more missions the United Launch Alliance should be allowed to conduct with the Russian engines. The company has ordered 29 engines, 15 of which are paid for and planned for use. The Pentagon wants the company to be able to use the rest. The House legislation would do that, while the Senate version would allow the alliance to buy more engines only if it wins bids, presumably against SpaceX.
Source:
The New York Times
Also posted in Aviation News thread:
Airbus Confirms that 3 out of 4 engines on the crashed A400 ran out of power
Three of the […] aircraft’s four turboprop engines suffered what it called “power frozen” after lift-off, and failed to respond to the crew’s efforts to regain control. A fourth engine responded normally.
Airbus Confirms that 3 out of 4 engines on the crashed A400 ran out of power
Three of the […] aircraft’s four turboprop engines suffered what it called “power frozen” after lift-off, and failed to respond to the crew’s efforts to regain control. A fourth engine responded normally.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]238076[/ATTACH]
F111F & High drag bombs (via Ballute)
Frankly, if they need cheap with quick delivery and high capabilities, Boeing is a no brainer.
SH will also offer a credible deterrence for less than 100M$/pce over land… and most importantly at sea.
The only advantage of the Eurofighter will have been through an indigenized production line for the Asian Belt (India?). But this is now a much remote hypothesis as the time goes by.
I doubt that you can replace Mig21 and 29 with F/A50 only. You’ll end-up with some serious lack in capabilities.
A flying system relying on buoyancy for flight is generally large. Hence you don’t park it like a Vespa.
Boeing suggest a city based system.
What a great news.
It is sad but true. The awkward decision to go for a full two decks fuselage and select the shortest fuselage with the biggest wing that had restricted span will haunt that project forever.
The now classic example of Multi-Billion $ top management failure.
Well, she flew today with a mock-up of the refueling boom and underwings drogue pods
[ATTACH=CONFIG]238019[/ATTACH]
And just to remember things correctly:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]238020[/ATTACH]
I guess we’ll see what comes into EOTS and when. Clearly there may be complicating factors as compared with a non-stealthy pod.
Because it is well known that Pods are not affected in anything by size and weight constraints. Obviously, this is NOT what Thales’s prospect customers are thinking when they request a Sniper Pod from LM.
In what world are you living?
My bad. Missread the article from Defense-aerospace.com understanding a long range targeting. No details are given in fact for the engagement phase.
The range of the Elta EL/M-2032. for maritime search is stated at 160NM on IAI website
Source:
http://www.iai.co.il/