Northrop repeatedly faked factory tests of LN-100 GPS systems, whistle-blower suit claims
Donaldson […] [,] plant manager at Northop’s facility in Salt Lake City, where the navigational systems are assembled and tested […] was demoted, he said, after he complained that employees were faking tests of the devices.
Rather than performing the required 10-minute test, Donaldson said, employees were saving time by skipping the test and indicating in paperwork that the device had passed.
He said that he alerted Glenn Kemp, his supervisor, and Ken Bishop, a human relations executive, about the problems, but plant employees continued to “manually insert spurious data causing a ‘pass’ reading.”
Source:
The LA Times
TVIP – That’s the X or Y airplane. I am not sure whether the production aircraft, let alone the very different G/H, ever had any provision to drop the wing tanks.
[…]
Internal weapons, by the way, are a loser for a fighter-size airplane. At best it’s like moving house and having only one size of box to carry your books, clothes and fishing poles. Internal AAMs without folding fins are particularly bad – conformal/semi-conformal is better from all efficiency viewpoints, particularly considering the heavyweight ejection mechanisms required.
You look so convinced of yourself that it’s beyond the waste of any effort.
The worst for me is to see such low-key argumentation now even mixing with democratic processes.
B52 carry drop tank. They simply don’t drop them because of structural benefits and cost.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]232361[/ATTACH]
The drop test:
Does Turkey have an invitation from the Iraqi government for a ground operation though? Don’t forget this is a sovereign country, intervention has to be by consent.
Iraqi, I don’t know. Syrian, surely not.
From an author’s point of view, the good side to this sort of low-circulation specialised publishing is that such expensive books are not widely available, so are unlikely to be ripped off by ‘a guy with a scanner’. As a result, the author gets a decent financial return for his or her work.
At the other end, there is plagiarism. You might escape to the “guy with a scanner” just to end up being plagiarized by “the guy in your client’s team”.
An agreement… That’s why you need a spontaneous decision.
But putting the specialized troops the Pentagon calls “Joint Terminal Air Controllers,” or JTACs, into combat comes with a cost. “The problem with putting JTACs on the ground is that once you get American boots on the ground—and one of those guys gets captured and beheaded on national TV or media,” the A-10 pilot said.
There is a problem here with the US press. ISIS is using terror as a weapon of war:
– Instilling terror among civilians to keep them quite (we have not heard about some kind of resistance in the occupied territory despite the presence of opponents)
– Terror among local troops
– Terror among coalition decision makers
It is important to cut them out of this ressource and US media should take the lead into that (Major Media networks, Youtube/Facebook, Politicians and on a relatively lower level, the press). By forbidding themselves to mention the level of atrocity inflicted to any captured trooper or civilian hostage (but not on local population) they will behead IS strategy out of this plentiful resource.
Coming around a general agreement with a request for enforcement by laws agencies will add effects to that (no spill of horrific images or worded details for rate audience).
Source:
http://www.thedailybeast.com
From the news forum regarding the future Introduction of the bird in Norway ( Lt. Col. Sigurd Fongen of the Norwegian F-35 Program Office speaking ):
“Look at recent conflicts, the warning times are shorter, there is not much time to train or mobilize, these are ‘come as you are’ conflicts [and] we need to be able to counter that.”
New facilities will include eight full-mission simulators so pilots will be able to virtually train in tandem with colleagues who are flying the actual aircraft. The Royal Norwegian Air Force hopes to conducts 40% of its training synthetically compared to 20% on the F-16 currently.
For several years, the country’s remaining F-16s will operate alongside the F-35, but will be rapidly downsized in 2019‑20. The government wants to ensure against capability gaps, a process that will have to be managed carefully.
Kongsberg Joint Strike Missile (JSM) (see page 23), which will give Norway its first taste of a strategic stand-off capability.
but the IRIS-T—Norway’s primary short-range air-to-air weapon—is not slated for integration onto the F-35, prompting Oslo to look at the AIM-9X Sidewinder. Officials are also considering the MBDA Meteor.
t when the brake chute is not needed the fairing could be removed and the compartment for the chute could potentially be used for other systems. Canadian company Airborne Systems is developing the braking parachute.
Norway is covering the cost of developing the system for the F-35A. […] Norway will pay as much as $246.6 million to develop and test the installation. The cost includes some modifications to the airframe around the brake-chute pod. These will be incorporated as an in-line retrofit to early aircraft—starting with the first two Norwegian production aircraft and included in later aircraft from the start of manufacture. Norway will also receive a royalty on any F-35s sold to other air forces with the parachute installed; Canada, Denmark and the Netherlands are leading candidates.
My radar seeker is getting big return signal from some of the female pilots. I would put my boom into their fuel receptical any day of the week
More seriously if the women can tly as good or better than their male colleagues good for them.
At least, flying away from misogynistic comments proves to be harder (don’t soar on that one) 😉
I think that the average trooper feel more in confidence when hell rain down on their enemy than on themselves on a timely and accurate fashion.
Youtuber are more the ones to get their moral down. The sound of the 30mm gun roaring mades for a lot of “clicks” and “Like” in the past 😉
All very true, but the original question was more in lines of “what aircraft could be supplied to Iraq, for them to fight IS?” IMHO B-1, B-52 and other big bombers and high tech equipment/payload are out of the question.
In fact, we can guess that te question has been already answered long before. The choice made by the coalition makes it as a fact: no plane should be supplied to Irak until Irak has a future as a democracy. In the waiting, the coalition stands ready to do the Air job even down to the bloody CAS.
This is a direct result of the internal politic of the past years. Irak is far more closer than Eu and the US that Afghanistan was.
Thanks you TEEJ. Fun link by the way 🙂
Yes but at what speed do they are supposed to operate ? (OT I know but stll interesting in that context – ditto Plane or Helo against ISIS down low?)
Alenia sees a new design with a carbonfibre airframe as being able to challenge the Grob Aircraft G120TP and Airbus Defence & Space PZL-130 Orlik.
It plans to define the requirements for the aircraft in conjunction with Italy’s air force, but anticipates it having the same maximum take-off weight and power as the SF-260.
How can it be? FligtGlobal lost me here
Great news by the way for the 345
The A-10 uses a Turbofan engine…http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_TF34
yes Nuno. But consider that the TF34 as far less outsourced electrical power potential than a CFM56 or alike.
Alos, the speed at wich the DIRCM operate on those application might be only approach and landing speed. Faster, probably means more power. You certainly don’t want your 10 to make a strafing run at those speed 😉