Our local TV news has reported last night, on the inquest of a half informed review on the death at Scampton last year due to the seat firing unexpectedly. This report states that the Arrows were twenty maintenance crew short and that untrained staff were being used!!!!!! The seat fired for no reason????????????? Having fired and put the Pilot to where the parachute could deploy it failed to deploy, the crew member did not seperate from the seat and impacted the ground, with fatal results. Questions need not be asked because those in authority know why this incident happened. Money saved life lost!
What does this say about our current state of the armed forces in general???This man died because of a lax attitude at all levels at Scampton.
I have no doubt this post will be gone by breakfast today
Sadly, we are like the Maya civilization: we are pushing the wrong ones down the cliff.
Ooops…On the last Colombian Air Force SR-560 pictrue visible something.
It looks like so looking at the 25 silhouettes. They are reportedly pretty active as it seems helping to hunt down planes flown by drug smugglers !
The ENAER T35 are seen flying over the Miraflores’s locks I guess
[…]
Recently published PAK-FA aerodynamics patent:
What to retain:
Critical alpha: 26ยฐ
Post stall regime >35ยฐ
LEVCON max deflection 60ยฐ (the patent does not says if it’s symetrical but let’s assume a 2/3rd law)
LEVCON usage: trim including Beta angle (hence my high B theo)
All this matches what some have suggested: a flat cruise mode with max alpha/beta and bank angle range selectable by the pilot (hence the depicted refueling mode and near ground manoeuvre).
What the patent does not speak about according to me only:
– Electro-static boundary layer ctrl (rear fuselage)
-A Sega type of ctrl for average pilots in post-stall regime (yes, your read it right: circle, triangle square and press!)
Thx Jรต.
Definitively Janes (Web version) lags behind you and this thread
NATO could not openly enter the war, as old colonial territory is excluded in the protocol, but UK was supported covertly by both US & France.
France & UK is today much closer aligned than it was then
UK would stand alone in such a scenario, depending on the political trend of the Fr gov obviously. But that’s my own opinion. And we are way out of subject, unless you want to imply that the 4 parked Typhies freezing down there are such a deterrence force that Argentina need to arms itself like a neo-soviet state ๐
In my view, and to keep this thread on the subject, the mission devoted to the ArAF are more complex than just Zulu alerts. And even there, a Kfir is the worst platform I can see for the mission.
Had the Ar AF been more prepared (what says a lot abt the backgrd of that conflict), they could hve sliced in half the RN… Which incidentally had some significant importance in the defense of the Northern part of Eu.
So, IF the Fr give the codes, they did that in a very centric purpose (and on humanitarian grounds aswell).
Yes, good point. Argentina would have learned from the Falklands War when France gave Britain info on defeating Exocet and halted deliveries. This makes a pure Chinese solution FC-1 as opposed to JF-17 a tempting prospect I guess. US/UK pressure will not be as big an issue. It will not give you the most capable plane on the market, but it means your pilots will not worry about having their radars and missiles compromised.
What you say is so true that Ar went first to a Fr platform upgraded with Fr electronics.
This is not the cold war anymore. Fr like the UK won’t bother to care that much after a colonial type of war raised by one or the other. And it’s all about deterrence.
alrdy posted! ๐
Hmmm, do I see a pilot or do I not?
LoL
The pic is so great (and the shapes of the bird are so glamorous) that I am sure we are many that didn’t notice it at all.
Thx for being that attentive!
First batch of CW out of Syria
It’s not really an aviation news but since it’s so hard to have a clue of what is going on in the air…
China and Russian vessels were escorting the transporter as well as Denmark and Norway ships.
Details from The BBC
1. The Syrian authorities are responsible for packing and safely transporting the chemical weapons from 12 sites across the country to the port of Latakia. Russia has supplied large-capacity and armoured lorries, while the US has sent container drums and GPS locators.
2. Russia is providing security for loading operations at Latakia, for which the US has supplied loading, transportation and decontamination equipment. China has sent 10 ambulances and surveillance cameras, and Finland an emergency response team in case of accidents.
3. Denmark and Norway are providing cargo ships and military escorts to take the chemicals to the container port of Gioia Tauro in Italy. Russia and China are also providing naval escorts and the first consignment of 16 tonnes left Latakia on 7 January.
4. In Italy, the “most critical” chemical agents will be loaded onto the US Maritime Administration cargo ship, MV Cape Ray, to be destroyed by hydrolysis in international waters. Less-toxic chemicals will be shipped by Norwegian and Danish vessels for disposal at commercial facilities.
Sources:
cihan.com
http://www.bbc.co.uk
[…]
Right, I need tea!
You deserve it. Good post!
The aforementioned three nations are using a hi-lo performance mix. Time will tell which one is more relevant.
Yes a super F16 will kill any doubt or concerns for the US. Everything is there at hand reach to build/heavily upgrade it given there is a full flow of F35 money in the industry.
That way, US/NATO could as well plays the nbr game as well as singing the quality song.
Oh.. and by the way, Boeing could do it…
If Argentian want to regain/gain Falklands/Malvinas, they should hurry buying Rafales before UK has again a carrier (signed Y-21 turtlesoup)
Aaaah c’mon. Stop tickling them with the Malvinas feather! They would need 100/150b$ for that (and 4x to 5 time that for the Brits to defend).
So. What could pleased them ? French avionics in a Swedish airframe. French avionics in a Chinese/Pak airframe (don’t!)… And this only since there is no upgraded/efficient 2K with maritime/A2A potential…
Efficient meaning lighten airframe with improved aero and engines.
Regarding the editor note, it shld be noted that French C130 are mostly stretched “H30” models (can’t found any confirm on the web)
By the way, great news for the A400 and the creative mind of the ppl involved in bridging the cap in FrAF. Now CAR ๐
I have no idea what any of that meant. Economically feasible? Militarily feasible?
The Irish don’t have an fast jet fleet. Should they be worried about the Russians invading (perhaps on their French built Mistrals)?
Ok, let’s say that we are at the middle age in Eu and your are in charge of the defense of a castel.
You know that your enmy own only swords and arrows. So your recommendation to your lord is to build a wooden gate all around the castel and recruits a couple of dozen of archers as a cheap and efficient way of protection.
Then an envoy tells you that your enmy hve signed some defence agreement with its neighbor that master the black powder. Your next preoccupation is then to alter the building work of the wooden gate, force your engineers to build a strong wall using mortar, sand and stones and raise an army of hundred of soldier (archers, spear handlers and knights to stray among the artillery positions).
Then an other envoy comes and told you that your enmy have managed to recruits some sorts of fanatics trained to be catapulted above castle’s walls. After much discussion with your commending officer, planners and engineer, you decide that you ned to raise a strong rapid reaction force able to quickly repel them anywhere where they had been catapulted.
So… Let’s look back at the above digression… Reasonably, only a wooden gate and a dozen of armed men would do the trick . But then looking closely at how events can unfold, it’s easy to see that you need the stone wall all around the castle, the hundreds men army and the special forces…
I am sorry but in the real world your enemy would never let you at rest. Thinking forward minded staffs and technology are the things a peaceful nation must have as a very basis. Conventions, lazy thinkers are among what they can’t afford.
So, you are right, angry Russians raining down on NATO assets are not what a reasonable man can expect (but is there any angry Russian left as any Dr Folamour in the US?). But then there is the world…
All the above is really simplistic and does not reflect really my own opinion. Those line are just a digression around the concept of frwd thinking in term a def cap.
EDIT:
And by the way, who wld want to invade Irland, the only nation serving fine lager for all everywhere, all around the world at any hours. Would you yourself risk to be banned from your local pub?!
Hi. Sorry for responding so late just got my account approved. I’m afraid OS does play a role in CAD design if you want to use up to date systems. I’m a design engineer and use SolidWorks. The latest version can only work on Windows 7 or 8. XP support has been dropped. I think SW2014 has only 64 bit due the memory requirements. I’d be curious to know what systems Sukhoi uses as it’s all about collaborative design and common formats for viewing designs.
SW cld run on both 32 and 64 versions until recently.
The prob is not in viewing files (there is plenty of standards to share or program able to open a model or an assembly for viewing/annotate). The difficulties reside in collaborative design. Once you start to stretch the gap btw your system and that of your contractors, it can be quickly a pain in the a** to handle all the conversions.