Where?
There are not stopping assembling all of F-35. They don’t cease at all. Their plan is to complete their first order as planned (38 to be assembled in-country) and then procure the 102 more directly from the Fortworth assembly line in order to get a better economy.
A source familiar with the production review says that the original 38 aircraft production run will go ahead as planned, but that it is not a given that some, or any, of the extra F-35s that Tokyo plans to obtain will be produced indigenously.
Source: FlightGlobal.com
Tu-22M3 Bomber crashes in Russia attempting to land
The accident occurred at 1:40 p.m. (5:40 a.m. ET) as the long-range bomber was attempting to land, according to Russian state news agency TASS, citing law enforcement officials.
The warplane had four crew members onboard: the commander, co-pilot, navigator and operator.Two crew members have died and two have survived, according to law enforcement officials, TASS reported.
It was not immediately clear what caused the plane to crash.
Interfax announced that One of the survivor latter died and quoted the ministry’s press service as saying that the Tupolev Tu-22M3 made a “hard landing” and was destroyed after getting caught in a snow squall in the Murmansk region
Source:
CNN.com
Sorry, the F-15C doesn’t have more range than the F-35A.
Sorry but that is not what I said. I am talking about non-stealthy platform and especially made a comparison b/w the Viper and the Eagle; what was relevant with the conversation.
The fact is that F-15 and F-16 are both in number in the inventory. The goal is to envision what would be the cheapest airframe to maintain in the long term in the relevant predicted scenario for the USAF/ANG. It could be that in the face of the vast empty spaces of the Pacific theater, keeping the F-15 instead of the cheaper per airframe F-16 might be relevant.
We are not talking of the benefices of the old Eagles Vs new F-35.
Rafale in India: a [half] paid deal
50% payment completed to this date – milestone achievement for upgrade in 2022 (see the parallel with the F4 schedule (available in 2022)).
And regarding the overall price (source: Times of India):

Remind me the C-17 that landed on the wrong runway. This was indeed a similar story but with with a much better outcome obviously:
Ananda, the search were halted by LionAir before being pursued by the Indonesia’s National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC). See my earlier post.
We will see how that unfold in the future but we surely can expect some interesting details to say the least.
Janes reporting one plane RTB and two pilots safe. Don’t know if this came after the above and is accurate.
EDIT:
No, sadly we had the latest and more accurate news.
From Scramble today (FB):
Another Su-34 update
We just received additional information concerning the mid-air collision of the Su-34s:
Some details changed. Two pilots were found dead in the sea, one rescued crew was a navigator, the fourth pilot is still missing, Rescue services are continuing their search.
The whole formation originally consisted of eight aircraft, including multiple Su-34s and possibly also some Su-35s. One aircraft returned after take-off with an engine malfunction. Seven aircraft continued their mission.
Two Russian Su34 collide in the Strait of Tartary in the far east of Russia (close to Japan)
- Two Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers collided in mid-air during a training event over the Strait of Tartary near Japan, Russian media reported on Friday.
- A rescue helicopter has recovered one pilot while efforts continue to save others.
- Russia grounded all Su-34 flights as a result.
[…]
Following the Friday morning collision, Russia has grounded flights of all Su-34s.
It seems one crew managed to eject as reported to TASS. The bombers were performing scheduled flights from the Hurba airfield, located ten miles outside Komsomolsk-on-Amur reported the Express
.
Source:
Business Insider
Singapore commits to “small” F-35 procurement
“Our F-16s will have to retire soon after 2030,” said defence minister Ng Eng Hen in a tweet. “Happy to report that [Defence Science and Technology Agency] and [the air force] have completed their technical evaluation for the replacement, and have decided that the F-35 would be the most suitable replacement fighter.”
[…]
“The technical evaluation also concluded that the RSAF should first purchase a small number of F-35 JSFs for a full evaluation of their capabilities and suitability before deciding on a full fleet,” said the ministry’s statement.“In the next phase, [the ministry] will discuss details with relevant parties in the US before confirming its decision to acquire the F-35 JSFs for Singapore’s defence capabilities.”
Also*:
Singapore has made no secret of its interest in the F-35, with senior officials expressing positive views about the programme in recent years. It is believed to have special interest in the F-35B given the highly urbanised nation’s scarcity of land, which makes basing challenging.
Source:
FlightGlobal.com
*of a special interest to me (and dedicated to the Swiss eval (see our much too long former discussions in the dedicated thread))
Airbus targets US navy RFP for new training helo
Airbus Helicopters vise un nouveau gros contrat avec le Pentagone. L’US Navy devrait publier le 22 janvier prochain un appel d’offres pour l’achat de 130 hélicoptères d’entraînement légers, destinés à remplacer ses vieux TH-57. Airbus est dans les starting-blocks: il va proposer son H135, un bestseller de sa gamme civile déjà vendu à 1.300 exemplaires. La compétition devrait vite se décanter: les participants auront 90 jours pour déposer leur offre. La marine américaine vise un contrat signé dès octobre 2019, et demande à recevoir les premiers appareils moins de douze mois plus tard, soit fin 2020.
—————————————————————Airbus Helicopters aims for a new big contract with the Pentagon. The US Navy is expected to issue a call for tenders on January 22 for the purchase of 130 light-weight training helicopters to replace its old TH-57s. Airbus is in the starting blocks: it will offer its H135, a bestseller of its civil range already sold to 1,300 copies. The competition should quickly settle down: participants will have 90 days to submit their bid. The US Navy is targeting a contract signed in October 2019, and is asking to receive the first aircraft less than twelve months later, ie at the end of 2020.
source:
Challenges.fr
French FAS conducts 9000km long range Strategic strike demo
Pour démontrer qu’ils restent opérationnels après plus de 11 heures de vol, les Rafales ont participé à un exercice tactique a leur arrivée au dessus de la métropole. Les deux Rafale devaient réaliser une mission de pénetration et simuler le tir d’un missile ASMPA tandis que d’autre appareils ayant décollés de Saint Dizier tentaient de les intercepter.
—————–To demonstrate that they remain operational after more than 11 hours of [their return] flight [from the Reunion island], the [two] Rafales took part in a tactical exercise at their arrival above the French mainland. The two aircraft had to carry out a mission of penetration and simulate the firing of an ASMPA missile while other aircraft that took off from Saint Dizier tried to intercept them.
Pls use ggl translate or another online translator
Regarding the simultaneous emergency landing at Okinawa yesterday, AirforceTimes.com have some details:
The pair of F-15s that landed at Kadena […] had different mechanical problems. One had an unsafe gear indication, [Pacific Air Forces spokeswoman Capt. Victoria] Hight said, and the other had a hydraulic issue.
Although the intend is pretty straightforward to understand, the switch of attention from middle-east to the vast Pacific zone of operation could slow this process. Eagles are more relevant and upgraded ones even more (fast pack – CFT) due to their superior range. The increased savings due to lower supportive operation cost might sound counter-intuitive to many but could prove ultimately fundamental. Add to that the increased threat on tanker operations that pushes them farthest from operating zones and we might see the USAF/ANG turned into a long[er] range airforce (at least for their non-stealthy components]
I guess we’ll have to wait to get the right answer.