dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News #2125611
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    French Air force presented Tuesday their newly acquired PC-21 fighter trainer

    Celle-ci présentait officiellement mardi son nouvel avion d’instruction des équipages de chasse, un biplace de fabrication suisse amené à remplacer les mythiques Epsilon et Alphajet. D’ici l’an prochain, l’armée de l’air disposera de 17 Pilatus PC-21, tous basés sur la base aérienne de Cognac-Châteaubernard (Charente). Le site a été choisi pour accueillir cette nouvelle école de chasse et absorbe actuellement les unités autrefois déployées à Tours. Trente jeunes pilotes et dix navigateurs de l’armée de l’air, dix pilotes de la marine nationale et dix moniteurs y seront désormais formés chaque année. « Une révolution, insiste le général Lavigne. Le PC-21 annonce la rénovation de notre système de formation. »
    Car cet avion remplace à lui seul Epsilon et Alphajet, et donc deux phases d’apprentissage jusque-là bien distinctes. « C’est un outil intelligent pour mettre le pied à l’étrier : 8 g, c’est comparable à ce que les pilotes encaissent dans un Rafale ou un Mirage », confirme le commandant Thibault, l’un des instructeurs. Si la formation s’avère moins onéreuse, la maintenance le serait aussi : l’entretien d’un PC-21 – confiée durant 8 ans au groupe britannique Babcock via un contrat de service – reviendrait à terme « dix fois moins cher qu’un Alphajet ».

    ————-
    [French Air Force] officially presented on Tuesday its new training aircraft fighter crews, a Swiss-made two-seater to replace the mythical Epsilon and Alphajet. By next year, the Air Force will have 17 Pilatus PC-21s, all based at the Cognac-Châteaubernard airbase (Charente). The site was chosen to host this new hunting school and is currently absorbing units formerly deployed in Tours. Thirty young pilots and ten sailors of the Air Force, ten pilots of the Navy and ten instructors will be trained there every year. “A revolution,” insists General Lavigne. PC-21 announces the renovation of our training system. “
    Because this aircraft replaces Epsilon and Alphajet alone, and thus two phases of learning hitherto quite distinct. “It’s a smart tool to put your foot in the stirrup: 8 g is comparable to what pilots cash in a Rafale or Mirage,” confirms the commander Thibault, one of the instructors. If training is less expensive, maintenance would be as well: the maintenance of a PC-21 – entrusted for 8 years to the British group Babcock via a service contract – would ultimately “ten times cheaper than Alphajet “.

    [ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tPilatus PC-21 AdlA.jpg Views:t1 Size:t126.5 KB ID:t3837541″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3837541″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”Pilatus PC-21 AdlA.jpg”}[/ATTACH]

    Source:
    Le Parisien.fr

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2125616
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    India: a rafale of protests for the Rafale

    100 organisations said to set protests across India

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2125618
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    2 French Mirage 2000 strike militants inside Burkina Faso

    France’s army said in statement that at the request of the local authorities its forces intervened to hunt down the attackers. It dispatched a Reaper drone and two Mirage fighter jets from a base in neighboring Niger on Wednesday night.

    “The drone detected a column of several motorcycles leaving the area in the direction of the north. After observing the group and establishing its terrorist nature, both Mirage planes carried out strikes,” the statement said.

    An army spokesman said some 15 motorcycles had been targeted, but it was too early to say how many fighters had been killed.

    and:

    French warplanes killed around 10 rebels in northern Burkina Faso following a deadly raid on a gendarmerie, the Burkinabe military command announced Friday.

    Source:
    USNews.com
    expactica.com

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2125622
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    I don’t know if has been already reported but [B]French reaper’s fleet set to be armed[/B]

    full conference here

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2125631
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    DefenseNews reports today that US FMS request includes:

    [INDENT]Belgium’s request for F-35s ($6.53 billion)

    [/INDENT]

    Source:
    DefenseNews.com

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2125692
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Airbus on MUM-T

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2125854
    TomcatViP
    Participant
    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2125875
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Diodes all over?!!
    Screw’s size from the brackets inside the bomb bay doors indicates that the missile bay is very small. This thing is probably not much bigger than an RC drone.
    Last but not least, why would you need stealth technology to bomb something not protected by an IADS?

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2125916
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Hallow: The single biggest thing to track a flotilla is to track their communications. With Stealth plane, discreet com and blablabla, the same flotilla leave a much reduced footprint behind them making the game of detection harder and forcing their opponents to unmask themselves even more in order to have a chance to detect them. In the meantime you can still launch and have the best picture around thanks to your superior SA.
    Regarding the QE carrier, is that such difficult to admit simply that she is one of the latest design around there?

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2125926
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    It’s sad to see the M346 loosing a major competition but the outcome was predictable: as written years ago now, the requirements were very demanding for that older airframe. The KAI/LM T-50 made it thanks only to its sophistication (the attempt made to be a LWF). With the fact that all sensors would be offboarded, there was a boulevard for a lightweight, nimble, modern and simple airframe that Boeing took with success.

    There is nothing more than that decipher in this decision. Boeing win here by partnering with Saab where elsewhere they won by partnering with Leonardo… An Italian company shall we all remember 😉

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2125964
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Don’t forget that she is a ship with RCS reduction operating the best of modern Stealth fighters. The mass effect of the larger deck is increased by the lower signature of the concept. It would be indeed worrisome for anyone to have this thing sailing off your shores.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2125970
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Regarding Sweden, remember that 10% of the so said 9+b$ contract are for Saab. The perspectives are also open for this new successful team to confront other challenges (I will remind you that this is basically a one year fast prototyped bug-free winning design – not something unremarkable today). Expect them to challenge the stealthy UCAV market.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2126090
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    people here have to understand that if they beat Leonardo that have an amazing design with a low price (presumably) it’s only because the T-X should offer beyond needed capabilities. Notably the flying trainer needs high G capabilities to simulate 5th gen and beyond aircraft that the M346 struggles to offer (much discussed already). So we have a superior airframe that seems to offer lower cost of ownership thanks to its modern design and tailored airframe (hence probably better than a 4th gen based LM/KAI T-50). Notice also that the USAF committed only 810M$ so far.

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2126180
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    B-2 upgrade by Northrop, late and over-budget, draw scrutiny on the B-21 program

    But the Air Force’s independent cost estimators now forecast that the date may slip to March 2024 and what was projected in October 2015 to be a $2.68 billion program is now estimated at $3.07 billion, according to documents and Air Force and Pentagon statements. That increase must be funded through 2025, so after making up some of the difference the Air Force must find an additional $300 million in its budgets to cover the rest.

    Northrop Grumman, the original B-2 contractor, is also the prime contractor on the coming B-21 bomber, so its performance has drawn particular Pentagon scrutiny.
    […]
    In a June 20 memo, Lord’s staff [(the Defense Department’s chief weapons buyer)] said Northrop’s performance “has been substandard” and that “it is unclear if the Air Force can afford this program, which has seen substantial cost and schedule growth” since the first major development contract in 2016.

    Source:
    Bloomberg.com

    in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2126182
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Let’s be realistic, It’s a better Helo for hauling Vip’s around.

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 5,621 total)