A deal to sell Typhoon fighter jets to Qatar will require “unprecedented” support from the British taxpayer, a government document has warned.
Treasury officials expressed concern that underwriting the £6 billion deal risked “billions of Exchequer funding” if Qatar defaulted on the agreement.
It’s all about being forced to Tango with the Qatari for the longer term (not our Tango III obviously).
Source (as seen in the News thread):
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/03/billions-exchequer-funding-risk-qatar-typhoon-deal/
Gripen E center fuselage assembly post views (I am amazed as how tick are the aluminum sub part (and hence why they choose to proceed such way with the result being an assembly that is indeed a puzzle of small machined part)). But I guess the idea is that If the fastener hold it together, this thing will fly for a thousand years.
Obviously BiO.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]262537[/ATTACH]
From Wiki
[ATTACH=CONFIG]262538[/ATTACH]
@BiO: we don’t know for sure if those “ppl” were British citizen brought in the US because of their assigned prior work or from the US. In the first case they would be legally allowed to continue their work initiated prior to their US assignment given that they both fulfill their confidentiality clauses and the IP rights they would re-use. If bound by some kind of NDA that make them unable to work on similar project afterward, those ppl would have to be compensated, which often means that there will still be on the payroll of the same entity in the US. Hence the speculations stop here. So IMOHO, in every case If there is a subject its because there is a project, no matter if that is under case a or b.
@Sintra:
No. It started with an underlying competitive process to power the UCAS that was then finalized by an agreement to put an M-88 core into the then combined Fr-UK proposed solution. This means only that whatever the Brits had in mind was modulable enough to be scaled and paired to a foreign design (foreign as non-integrated). Once again this reflect the above underlined points.
B/w someone wrote this at the time:
The timeline is spot on. Decade and a half is precisely the expected timeframe for delivering hardware (whatever hardware FCAS becomes), on top of that, one of the biggest players in every major “Pentagon Jet war” for the last decade has been Rolls Royce Liberty Works, and while i dont have doubts that there are restrictions between RR North America and RR Uk, i would be more than a bit surprised that a great part of the development work done by Liberty Works in things like the F136/ADVENT/etc wouldnt cross fertilise the UK future programs (pretty much what P&W and Snecma did three decades ago with the likes of the TF30/TF306/M53).
Cheers
…
UK had an engine for the now defunct UK/Fr UCAS project that must have had enough modularity built in it to accept an M-88 core at a latter phase of its design. When I read also that the future engine would be build with advanced multi-disciplinary modeling technologies, I have no doubt that both are related.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]262500[/ATTACH]
Source:
https://www.msn.com/
Greek T-2E crashes
The aircraft crashed at 0850 h local time 13 km north of Sparta. The co-pilot ejected and was recovered and transported to hospital, while the pilot was found dead in the crash area.
Probably that’s the Instructor pilot that successfully ejected while the trainee died
Army depot bosses arrested for Black Hawk rotor blade parts scam
Albert Flores, 57, of Corpus Christi and Samuel Escareno, 54, are both charged with one count each of conspiracy and falsifying records related to aircraft parts, the Justice Department said in a statement.
The supervisors allegedly commanded subordinates at the depot “to make false entries and certifications on UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter main rotor blade dynamic balance data sheets,” the Justice Department said. “The defendants allegedly did so in order for nonconforming rotor blades to appear to meet specifications when they actually did not.”
Source:
Army times
Top Gun: Maverick Will Likely Feature F-35C Joint Strike Fighters
With six F-35Cs operating aboard Lincoln since Aug. 20th, USNI News understands, the film crew almost certainly got an up-close look at the Navy’s newest fighters – operating alongside the Super Hornets, the EA-18G Growlers, the E-2 Hawkeye and the C-2 Greyhound.
Asked what role the new jets may play in the movie, Michael Singer, vice president of marketing and publicity for Jerry Bruckheimer Films and Television, told USNI News “we are not providing any details about the production at this time.”
[…]
Navy spokesman Lt. Seth Clarke told USNI News that the level of support the Navy will provide is still being worked out, but “I can tell you that U.S. naval aviators will be flying in this movie.”
He added that Lincoln specifically was chosen for filming because “the ship’s schedule was ideal based on the needs of Paramount films at this time.
Source:
USNI.org
Eagle1, the unique bird of prey that have an empathy to target squirrel food… Once in your life time, fly beyond your pants, at least mine. Thank you.
He must have some kind of complex.
Do you realize that’s sound like a racist comment?
@Sintra: you seemed to have missed the large panel of systems showcased by the UK industries related to this project (flying/ tested/ prototyped).
That’s a crazy statement. Tempest as a flying demonstrator has technologies that are more advanced than what so far has surfaced from the Franco-German(?) side. If financing is too much a burden, the systems in it will live in other projects. Instead of having a frontal approach with a competitor, complementary or even cross-embedded shared development should be the route to follow on both side (and as in effect it will be easier).
And once again, financially speaking only, there are LESS risks on the UK side than among the “coalescence” of European partners, in every way you turn the problem.
Interview with Close-up view of the Aerosonde vertical lifting system. Interesting to see that it is a modular upgrade that can be plugged-in on the basic version.