dark light

TomcatViP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 5,621 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: USAF not F-35 thread #2145158
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Impressive sequence of real life testing at the end. 7.5 min per recovery is obviously still high but could fit already inside SOCOM needs.

    @Hallow: Fr Rafale (and E-2C) are exercising on the Bush aircraft carrier… Hardly an USAF asset 😉 This thread is all about the USAF (except the F-35).

    I guess you can post this in the Rafale thread or in the Navy news section.

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2145579
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    No like or dis-like on my side. don’t venture on that field. thanks. it’s all about being rationale.

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2145583
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Look Corsair, it is sad to say but Rafale would have had a chance if it was undoubtedly over passing the capacity now fielded by the Fin AF. On other words, what worth billion the non-uS offer does have?
    Given the recent upgrade of their C and Ds, there is not much left to emphasize. As I wrote above, this RFP is not all about looking for another SLEP! You can’t re-skin a cat and call it a Tiger.

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2145666
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Corsair:

    maintenance hubs, which will be in Europe but outside of Finland, implying significantly decreased control on med-high level servicing.

    Maintenance hubs are mainly a measure by the JPO to help the program to be more cost-effective. Obviously, trust among partners is at the base of this system just like it does among airlines. It remains to you to prove that Finland could feel deceived by this when the country has been operating among NATO partners for years. The main issues are on the diplomatic fields when you have some political divergences (none that I can see here) and on economical grounds with the sustainment of national industries (just as mandated in the latest Swiss RFI).

    in reply to: 2018 F-35 News and Discussion #2145690
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Japan, U.S. start joint F-35 fighter drills in northeastern Japan

    The ASDF’s F-35A, the first of its kind deployed to Japan, and around eight F-35Bs from the U.S. Marine Corps’ Air Station Iwakuni in Yamaguchi Prefecture, will take part in combat training and bombing exercises through May 24, according to the Japanese Defense Ministry.

    Isn’t this the first exercise outside of the US where two different nation’s 35s participate?

    Source:
    Kyodo news.net

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2145710
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    all those capabilities are already fielded with their F/A-18. I am not sure that Finnish mod has put an RFP that can be simply resumed to a quest for yet another SLEP contractor. They are on the run for new capabilities. So, even if Swedish defense sector offer plenty of opportunity in advanced systems, I do agree with Pesko that their line here is quite thin.

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2145750
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    Finland has also taken the lead of part of the C/D user community in software mods for those retaining the old 1553 set of processor (if my mem stands right).

    Significantly, their recent upgrade does not lack any of the prime assets in weapon capability branded as being what’s make a good 4th+ gen fighter.

    Notice the fully loaded high alt/high alpha short sequence at the end.

    Here is the Aviationist take on the subject

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2146070
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]260389[/ATTACH]

    RAF/USAF Fairford. Senior Span Dragon lady (80-1083) complete with ice from rapid decent

    Source:
    FB

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2146118
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    That was not the conclusion of the new administration. As said:
    – somewhere I posted the link to the senate report
    – MoD ordered some drastic improvement lashing at the status-quo making a clear point that this would be achieved at equal cost for the public

    But we are not going to argue this case in the Typhoon thread. It would show some disrespect to the readers.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2146136
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    disponibilitĂ© des flottes des forces françaises stagnent depuis 2012, autour de 44%. En 2016, elle s’Ă©levait Ă  44,4% et sur les six premiers mois de 2017 Ă  44,1%. Ces chiffres signifient que moins d’un aĂ©ronef sur deux est en mesure d’effectuer la mission pour laquelle il a Ă©tĂ© acquis. Et selon le rapport, “la disponibilitĂ© des hĂ©licoptĂšres, des avions de patrouille maritime et de l’aviation de transport tactique ne permet pas d’honorer le contrat opĂ©rationnel seuil bas, nĂ©cessaire pour rĂ©pondre Ă  la tenue de la situation opĂ©rationnelle de rĂ©fĂ©rence et Ă  la prĂ©paration opĂ©rationnelle”. Au-delĂ  de la difficultĂ© Ă  tenir les contrats opĂ©rationnels, le manque de disponibilitĂ© des appareils “obĂšre la capacitĂ© des forces Ă  soutenir dans la durĂ©e l’activitĂ© aĂ©rienne”, estime Christian Chabbert.
    […]
    Ainsi la disponibilité atteint 80 % en opérations extérieures mais a contrario, elle ne dépasse pas 30 % en métropole
    —————

    the availability of French forces fleets have stagnated since 2012, around 44%. In 2016, it stood at 44.4% and in the first six months of 2017 at 44.1%. These figures mean that less than one out of two aircraft is able to complete the mission for which it was acquired. And according to the report, “the availability of helicopters, maritime patrol aircraft and tactical transport aircraft does not meet the low threshold operational contract necessary to meet the maintenance of the baseline operational situation and operational readiness “. Beyond the difficulty of keeping the contracts operational, the lack of availability of the devices “undermines the ability of the forces to support the long-term air activity,” said Christian Chabbert.
    […]
    Thus the availability reaches 80% in external operations but conversely, it does not exceed 30% in metropolitan France

    But everything is fine Mme La Marquise
    Take into consideration that the nbr of airframe deployed is drastically low (8 devoided to Barkane for example)

    Source:
    La tribune.fr

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2146141
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    this is not true. Availability rates were posted here (by me?) and show that the situation is far from being under control or the result of a relaxed attitude. Those bad numbers led the Fr MoD to put a tough pressure on the industry to correct the problem at a constant cost.
    For example, among all the fleet of A400M fielded, at any given time, only one single airframe is mission capable.
    Newish Rafales have lesser availability rate than 1980ish M2K
    Fr classical C130s have one of the worst availability rate in the world despite tremendous investments in the past leading transport missions to still relies on derelict c160 Transals and for now Russian cargo plane (an unacceptable and dubious trade).

    Etc… (have a look at he Fr Helo fleet)

    in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2146218
    TomcatViP
    Participant
    in reply to: Near disaster in San Fransisco, Canada Air 759 #471912
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    It is interesting that an highly experienced pilot had to delay his decision to abort its own landing so long. I would expect this to be the center of the enquiry (decision process).

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2146284
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    US files complaint over Chinese laser use in Djibouti

    WASHINGTON — The Pentagon says the U.S. has issues a formal complaint to China over the use of lasers near the military base in Djibouti (jih-BOO’-tee) that were directed at aircraft and resulted in minor injuries to two American pilots.
    Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White says the U.S. is confident that Chinese nationals are responsible for the use of the lasers. She says the incidents represent a serious threat to U.S. airmen. She says the U.S. has asked China to investigate the incidents.
    The Pentagon says reports from pilots indicate that on three occasions the lasers were military grade and came from the Chinese base nearby.
    The U.S. has notified airmen to exercise caution when flying in that area. The Chinese recently built a base near Camp Lemonnier, the U.S. base in Djibouti.
    Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Also

    On Thursday, the FAA issued a warning advising military aircraft to exercise “extreme caution” when transiting the area. The FAA has issued repeated warnings since April 14 to pilots in the area.
    In a recent incident, two U.S. flyers piloting a C-130 turboprop transport suffered minor eye injuries after being exposed to the laser beam, a Pentagon official told the Wall Street Journal.

    Sources:
    The Washington Post.com
    Stars & Stripes.com

    in reply to: Mirage 2000 #2146294
    TomcatViP
    Participant

    More 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 5,621 total)