dark light

Nashio966

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,671 through 2,685 (of 3,400 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1188527
    Nashio966
    Participant

    congratulations to all involved, in the realisation of a dream most said was impossible.

    i cannot wait to see her this summer 😀

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1188637
    Nashio966
    Participant

    http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/Hihonyr8811/trio.jpg

    Not my picture sadly, taken by Mrs Dave Thomas.

    does anyone have a higher res of this photo that i can put on my desktop background?

    cheers

    Ben

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1188835
    Nashio966
    Participant

    fantastic shots, thankyou for sharing, i wish i was up there 🙁

    in reply to: XS422 – Progress? #1189248
    Nashio966
    Participant

    Yes indeed it is true, once it was made known that the Lightning would be retired around 18 months or so from the actual due date, the crews were largely let off the hook with regard to fatigue conservation as it was no longer nessecary, i do recall an 11 Sqd pilot saying that once it was set in stone that the Lightning was going away nearly every mission flown was ACM, both because there was the intent to use up the remaining fatigue life on the aircraft but also “just because we could”.

    lucky bu99ers

    in reply to: XS422 – Progress? #1189314
    Nashio966
    Participant

    talking of hours, the first F-104 delivered to the German airforce was used for ground instruction and only has 19 hours in total, even thought its the oldest one they have! i had heard that towards the end of the lightnings time in service the pilots regularly took them to their limits to use up the remaining hours. was this true?

    in reply to: Ground Runnable aircraft In The UK #1189362
    Nashio966
    Participant

    i dont know? bex would know but she hasnt posted on here in months anyone that knows, copy the list and add to it?

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1189460
    Nashio966
    Participant

    …Sally B relies heavily on the Sally B club for a lot of funding…

    and richard branson for the insurance? 🙂

    “…mr braaaanson have you got any more spare money lying around?…” :diablo:

    in reply to: Aircraft names and places (Merged with a zombie) #1189462
    Nashio966
    Participant

    thanks for that 🙂 i never really took the time when i was at school there for two years to have a look round for aviation related road names, though it is odd about harwell considering that it was basically the birthplace of the uk nuclear industry, built on an old raf station. ill ask my dad, he lives not far from there.

    in reply to: Ground Runnable aircraft In The UK #1189486
    Nashio966
    Participant

    ok ive added the two canberras, i think the shacks deserve a place, perhaps the Thread title could be Changed to Ground running aircraft?

    in reply to: Ground Runnable aircraft In The UK #1189595
    Nashio966
    Participant

    I have a ground running Welland, built in December 1943, so, I believe, the oldest running jet engine in the world.

    Terry

    is that the one that was at legends last summer alongside the merlins and next to the griffon? fantastic job, i was amazed at how easily she started, a quick wind round of the turbine spool and that was basically it. beautiful 🙂

    in reply to: Binbrooks Lightning XR724 #1190267
    Nashio966
    Participant

    same here, always happy to help should any help be needed

    in reply to: XS422 – Progress? #1190421
    Nashio966
    Participant

    cheers, always interesting to hear about such a project 🙂

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1190481
    Nashio966
    Participant

    i thought waddo was all torn up at the moment? though i suppose we arent talking immediately. it will definitely be interesting to see where she goes. surely there must be somewhere that would take her for free? or is this unrealistic lol 🙂

    in reply to: DH Vampire Afterburner #1190483
    Nashio966
    Participant

    The tail-plane and elevators wouldn’t survive very long if that were the case. 🙂

    No, the tail booms are angled upwards slightly so that the horizontal surfaces are above the jet efflux.

    cheers for that, you learn something new every day , post edited accordingly 🙂

    in reply to: DH Vampire Afterburner #1190612
    Nashio966
    Participant

    well i wouldnt have thought there would be much of a problem with the vixen, the rudders are mounted on top of the rudders and aren’t directly inline with the exhaust, also the airframe could probably deal with the surge from reheat thought not without damage i would have thought. not so sure about the vampire, considering that the airframe is wood (wooden cockpit pod) and metal. though the tail booms are angled up slightly so that the horizonatal surfaces are above the effulx, i would have thought that an afterburner would still almost certainly compromise the tail structure.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,671 through 2,685 (of 3,400 total)