🙂 yep thats it lol
according to demobbed, XX466 is on a fire dump in guernsey, the photo is recent having been taken september 2007, and XL578 is on the dump at kemble, again the photo having been taken sept 2007
typical media got the serial wrong AGAIN
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7350278.stm
“like any veteran, FH558…..”
lol
as its stupid oclock in the morning, and i cant sleep, having quickly peered at wikipedia, it says that the F-111 is capable of mach 2.5, where the TSR.2 capable of mach 2.15, but im not sure if she was ever in fact “topped out”
im not sure about payload, as the aircraft that flew never progressed to weapons tests (can anyone clear this up?)

taken in 1993
Hello!
What is the difference between the “XR-xxx” and “XS-xxx” designations for the aircraft? Apparently the ‘Rs’ were the prototypes and the ‘Ss’ were the first production models???
Also, does anyone know the size and location specifications for the insignia roundels and tail flashes, i.e., the dimensions of the insignia, and their specific (dimensional) location on the aircraft? If so, a posting with the information would be very much appreciated.
David Plummer
pretty sure you will find that all the TSR.2 designations were “XR” the first being XR219 and so on
has she gone?
… its not the only Gustav in the world-and the RAF have no plans to ground their equally priceless Lancaster as far as i’m aware
thats a very good point there
second looks similar to a kingfisher but obiously isnt, it seems to have an inline engine or an inverted V
These are the times ETA Mon 14th Apr 1530 local ETD Wed 16th Apr 1100 local
TJ
Fantastic news 🙂 🙂
What exactly is the shame ? We are probably the only country in the world that has maintained aircraft in the form of a historic flight for such a long time. Coupled with that the RAF let the Gustav rebuild go ahead – I cannot think of many other countries where that would happen. The aircraft was allowed to exceed it’s permitted flying period. Near the end of that it had the unfortunate incident which very nearly ended in tragedy. Now if you view the number of 109’s/Buchons that have been operated in private hands and examine the accident rate for them it makes grim reading . What would your opinion be if she had been restored to fly again and lost in another accident ?
david perhaps graveyard was the wrong word. i mean it in a sense that when compared to cosford, where the aircraft still smell like aircraft and it seems are still “alive” ive been to hendon several times, and each time i go they no longer seem to be alive, there is no, what my father likes to call “Machine spirit” dont get me wrong they are all beauitiful and many of them unique aircraft, but im sure others agree with what ive said.
Ben
It was restored to flying condition after AVM Allison’s unfortunate finger trouble with the Radiatoir flap switch though!
so she could still fly???!!!! it breaks my heart to see an aircraft that could and should fly, stuck in a graveyard like hendon
Whilst Black 6 was destined to be placed in the RAFM, the small matter of her coming to rest upside-down in a field by the M11 had some contribution to her current status.
i know one of the really rare things about her is her original engine, is that engine in her now?
I’m Fascinated by the engineering too- Its great to see an Aircraft built up from a pile of bits- by people who’ve most likely never worked on that aircraft before, and who probably haven’t got all the drawings- when a restoration eventually flies (flys??) i worry about it crashing!- and i agree about Hendon- they might as well be models
and to see black six there knowing full well that she could have easily flown again!!! its the only aviation museum i dislike, sorry to say 🙁 id heard about the DX p47 isnt she going to be restored to fly?
i think ive seen that one, i really meant, nice to see one flying, i really dont like hendon as the aircraft all feel dead 🙁