dark light

Spectre130

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 208 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2515825
    Spectre130
    Participant

    A friend confirmed it as ZH876 (5460)

    in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2515920
    Spectre130
    Participant

    The only thing I am getting concerned on for all old C-130s are their wing-boxes… The USAF C-130s are having a hell of a time with them right now…

    in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2515958
    Spectre130
    Participant

    That wont work in my opinion. The K is underpowered for todays RAF needs, the J is much more capable.
    Some of our K models date right back to the 60s and have been in constant use since then. Im not saying the K isn’t a good aircraft its still allot more rugged than the J, The J has a habit of breaking down and grounding the A/C wheres as the K keepings going.

    In what way is the J better then the K?

    The J is a little girls plane.

    in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2515969
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Anyone know what version this was that went down?

    in reply to: Russian planes #2516439
    Spectre130
    Participant

    The SU-27 is getting old along with most of the Russian fighters I have been hearing so much BS about the F-16 getting old the C version came out in 1985 thats pretty young as far as fighters go but the Russian fighters are just now getting avionics upgrades over all they are behind the U.S by a long shot the F-22 can completely obliterate anything in the sky that is a solid fact and I am sure this will get that MIG-23 guy pissed because he does not want to accept it . They just need to face the fact that they are beat.

    The C model came out in 1983 and 24 years in NOT young for american fighter (though most F-16Cs that are flying in the US are newer than 1983 year model)

    in reply to: The Sun gets the A-10 blue-on-blue tape #2517946
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Not my point – I said there were issues with the procedures that needed addressing, precisely because there were errors on both sides (and possibly because the Scimitars were in the wrong place as well, though I’ve not heard any suggestion that they were).

    The fact that the controller assured the pilots there were no friendlies in their area, without enough info to go on, contributed to the pilots’ confusion. On the other hand the pilots gave vague and inaccurate information on their location to the controller. Furthermore the pilots had extreme difficulty identifying the vehicles on the ground, and there don’t seem to have been any problems with visibility, so perhaps more training should be given to pilots on vehicle recognition in combat conditions (and what the orange panels look like from the air – it’s one thing telling aircrew that friendly vehicles will have panels of orange plastic on top of them, and another for them to know exactly the shape, tone and nature of the panels from the air).

    Good points…what if the Insurgents also knew of the orange panels and used orange cloth to make them look friendly? It happens.

    also, this was very early in the war.. day 6 I believe. Did these pilots receive a proper intel brief?
    I was not happy with how they carried out the attack…but I can not tell you what I would have done. I was not there. I did not see what they saw… If I was in charge, I would have them flying a Learjet with Pelosi on it.

    The fact is, the A-10 is low tech. It requires a FAC on the ground…the FAC is their eyes and ears.

    I am betting that all three(the A-10, the FAC and the Scimitars) were in the wrong place.

    in reply to: The Sun gets the A-10 blue-on-blue tape #2519231
    Spectre130
    Participant

    I am sure everyone here would congratulate you on your bravery and dedication and thank you for your part in the saving of life.

    I am not here to beat my chest and say “look at me, I’m a hero” I only mentioned it to add the validity to the story. I did a job that had to be done. I agreed with the job. and If I could, I would be right back over there today.

    in reply to: The Sun gets the A-10 blue-on-blue tape #2519232
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Again, I am not trying to absolve anyone or contemn another party but, do you think that the insurgents might have known about the orange panels and copied them? Do you honestly think that these guys that go out there are “Cowboys” and don’t give a **** who gets hurt? Do you think that the one who saw”orange rockets” might have thought damn well he did… They were high up and they did clear there were NO friendlies.

    They made a horrible error that they will live with the rest of their lives … I am sure wishing they could switch places.

    in reply to: The Sun gets the A-10 blue-on-blue tape #2519511
    Spectre130
    Participant

    …Though one that should be discussed, dissected, investigated and unpacked to see if there is anything that can be done to prevent as many future occurrences as possible. There were a number of mistakes in this instance which should not have been made and could easily be addressed. Other factors such as battlefield stress and ‘fog of war’ are less easy to control but just saying ‘it’s war, **** happens’ doesn’t really help anyone does it?’

    The USMC investigation ruled that the pilots were not at fault because they followed procedure. If that’s the case (and I have my doubts) surely this means the procedures need improving?

    Blue-on-blue may be an inevitable consequence of war, but not all cases of it are unavoidable. This case was avoidable.

    I do not think anyone is arguing that at all. Things can always be better. Situations can always be approved upon.
    -Do we know for a fact that the British were in the spot that they were supposed to be in? I do not believe anyone really knows unless you were there.
    -Was the controller sure about were the pilots were talking about? He kept saying that there were NOfriendlies in the area where the A-10 was (thought) to be looking.
    -were the A-10 pilots in the right area? Should they have attacked knowing that they saw ORANGE (though the one thought they were missiles…I did not know missiles were painted orange..but maybe they got a briefing or there was an instance..we do not know. We all can peculate this thing till we all die and no one will ever know for sure what happened….we can only work our asses off to get better…end goal, the end of Fratricide.

    There was a lot in the error chain that I saw. Were the pilots perfect NO but, they did ask several times if the area was clear of friendlies…. then they asked again and were assured again.

    On my first mission in Afghanistan, we were re-routed and ordered to drop our cargo to go pick up an air-evac mission. A British soldier was cleaning his gun and shot his buddy in the head. He flat lined on us three times but in the end he survived. (He shouldn’t have because my pressurization system was **** up and I could not keep the Hg within limits to carry a head wound patient. Thank God he survived.

    in reply to: The Sun gets the A-10 blue-on-blue tape #2519537
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Friendly fire kills two UK tank crew

    Rory McCarthy in Camp as-Sayliya, Qatar, and agencies
    Wednesday March 26, 2003
    The Guardian

    Two members of a British tank crew were killed and two critically injured after their Challenger 2 tank was fired on by another Challenger tank in southern Iraq. A single tank round took the turret off the tank in the misdirected attack, which happened on Monday in pitch darkness.
    The two dead men were members of the Queen’s Royal Lancers, part of the First Royal Regiment of Fusiliers battle group. They were named as Corporal Stephen Allbutt, 35, from Stoke-on-Trent, and Trooper David Clarke, 19, from Littleworth, Staffordshire.

    “The soldiers were tragically killed in a ‘friendly fire’ incident during a period of multiple engagements from enemy forces on the outskirts of Basra,” Colonel Chris Vernon, a British military spokesman, said.

    “Regardless of the careful planning and measures taken in the type of operations in which we are engaged and in the heat of battle there is always a risk that incidents such as this might happen.”

    The army would not say whether the tank which fired the shot was from the same regiment.

    Col Vernon said an investigation was under way into the accident, the first in recent years in which British forces have been killed in error. It will centre on why the tank’s sophisticated new identification technology failed to prevent the attack.

    in reply to: Raptor does the Kulbit… #2519697
    Spectre130
    Participant

    So how many are lost in airshow accidents?

    (1)
    http://www.metacafe.com/watch/233651/su_27_crash_in_slow_motion/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=&v=qt761GorqgI
    (2)
    http://www.bofunk.com/video/2220/su_0_crash.html

    thats two where the pilots just let the plane go.

    Any more?

    in reply to: Raptor does the Kulbit… #2519768
    Spectre130
    Participant

    The fact of the matter is,
    No one has seen what the F-22 can do. They will not push the plane to the edge at an airshow. We have no idea what else that plane can do.

    About the whole SU-27 family, It is a very capable airplane that is able to do impressive airshow maneuvers but, look at how many have been lost at airshows. That tells me that the pilots are taking great risks in bringing the aircraft way past its envelope. But hell, people seem to like it and they sell a lot of planes.

    in reply to: F-14 in Russian Hands #2520554
    Spectre130
    Participant

    I have the complete F-18A/C manual, but it does not contain any aerodynamics figure, just hundreds of tables with performance data. I can’t see any point in publishing aerodynamic derivatives in a flight manual. It is stuff a pilot or a maintenance guy doesn’t need.

    Do you have the -1 or the -1-1?

    in reply to: Raptor does the Kulbit… #2523354
    Spectre130
    Participant

    The first shots of Desert Storm were fired by Apaches, taking out several ground based air defense radar sites.

    Led by USAF PaveLows 🙂

    in reply to: C130 Germany #2523577
    Spectre130
    Participant

    When we were flying out of Kyrgyzstan, Spain had a C-130H1 (about the same airplane we were flying ..I flew 73/74 year model herks)

    Spain had a beautiful flight deck in theirs… I can’t remember if it was full glass or if it was some glass but it was much more modern then C-130H3s are…

    I do not know who updated them though.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 208 total)