dark light

Spectre130

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 208 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RPV vrs Airliner #560130
    Spectre130
    Participant

    If I were a bett’n man, from what I remember, the area looks like the Kabul area.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1284907
    Spectre130
    Participant

    There is of course the Hercules that hit the guy standing on top of a Landrover at Cirencester a few years ago….

    More info would be appreciated.

    in reply to: RPV vrs Airliner #560327
    Spectre130
    Participant

    I can not comment on the credibility of this youtube movie but, Our plane almost hit a few UAVs from a few different nations. Seems ATC has no clue where these things are .
    One was bright daylight, and we were on landing approach and this predator come right past our nose at the same flight level…we asked the tower what the hell was going on, and they were clueless…the “operator” was not in contact with them.

    in reply to: The old Iraqi air force #2506940
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by IRAQI_PILOT
    I CONFIRM NOT A SINGLE FIGHTER GOT OFF THE GROUND IN 2003 ALL PILOTS WERE TOLD TO (GO HOME) AS NO POINT IN EVEN TRYING,,,
    EXCUSE ME WHO EVER IS TRYING TO MAKE IT INTO A CULTURE THING…
    P.S I WAS THERE..OK

    Do you know anything about Iraqi airforce operations between 1991 and 2003? Were there combat missions against insurgents?

    I too would love to hear more about this…Though not in a fighter… I would have been the opposition flying drops in the C-130 in the north at (or near) the kickoff of the war.

    in reply to: Dutch F-16 J-198 belly landing #2507118
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Those -131 pods are expensive (we used to use those) but, an F-16 is a lot more… the pilot did a good job.

    in reply to: Top Ten Modern Aircraft #2508127
    Spectre130
    Participant

    I think that ColonelMarksman needs to define the word Modern

    in reply to: C-47 43-16369 #1291283
    Spectre130
    Participant

    I don’t believe it’s the actual aircraft (which was c/n 15586/27031 43-49770 and appears to have gone to the SVAF in 1969).

    I gather c/n 20835 was in preservation and with EAA WoA when painted as AC-47 043-770 “Spooky770” with side-firing guns to represent the machine in which your hero’s actions resulted in his honour.

    Thank you for the clarification.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #8, for Pictures and Discussion. #2509043
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Might as well be Australian:
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1166533/M/
    Where are the good old days when you could tell the nationality of a plane at a glance – typical camo schemes:) , BIG roundels:D
    F–K low-viz gray:mad:

    This picture is of a -30 without externals…
    I do however understand what you are saying….

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #8, for Pictures and Discussion. #2509109
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Could be Italian C-130J?

    Very well might be, I know they did buy the option and used the external fuel tanks. I am on my small laptop and can not see the aircraft up close…but if I were to give it a guess I would say Italian just by the Externals.

    in reply to: Top Ten Modern Aircraft #2509113
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Crap, I thought 350.000 killed Japanese civilians would have sufficed for the top position of the B-29. Still, I guess the sticker “killed most people per aircraft than any other design” will motivate young boys to join the air force: “Mum, I want to kill even more people doing just button pushing.”

    @Spectre130
    Do some thinking before hailing the killing of people.

    I am sorry that you are offended by deaths caused by military aircraft. This might not be the place for you. It is a sad fact that people die in war and that the machines that were built and used were built and used for the sole purpose of killing. If these aircraft did not kill, they would have no place in the wars that they have fought in.
    your figures of 350,000 (214,000 from Nagasaki and Hiroshima) out of 3900 aircraft only make it at just under 90 kills per aircraft built.

    in reply to: C-47 43-16369 #1291659
    Spectre130
    Participant

    That was the plane Levitow was on? Correct?

    in reply to: Top Ten Modern Aircraft #2509213
    Spectre130
    Participant

    AC-130

    1.AC-130
    The AC-130A/E/H/U trumps them all.

    If you look at how few have been built (operational) and then how many kills each aircraft have racked up per plane…there is no airplane in the world with that many kills.

    2.F-15
    3.MiG-21
    4.SU-27(30)
    5.KC-135
    6.C-130 (bullets and beans to the fight)
    7.F-14
    8.MiG-15
    9.A-1
    10. MH-53 Pave Low

    in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2513644
    Spectre130
    Participant

    According to what I have read, while the 27J looks like a Herc, any commonality that it had with the 130J is diverging rapidly. According to Rolls Royce website, the 27J engines are smaller and lighter than the 130J ones. The props are the same, but the cockpit configuration and software of the 27J has not changed to match the upgrades to the 130J. That means the cockpit commonality benefit is gone, and also that someone is going to have to invest heavily to bring the software of the 27J up to spec – Lockheed Martin is not doing it as they have severed ties with the aircraft. So far, the only nation who has any 27J airframes even close to being operational is Greece, and the HAF seems to be pretty quiet about the aircraft. Best to dig a bit deeper before making any committments!

    I agree, Just because it looks like a “baby herk” Doesn’t mean that the crews will be able to fly the aircraft the same way. All the systems are different so I do not feel that the crews could be Certified on both just because they are certified on one.

    in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2514572
    Spectre130
    Participant

    Just because the site was (or wasn’t) secure does not mean that the airplane would or could ever be flyable again….within effective cost savings.

    in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2515577
    Spectre130
    Participant

    I would agree with the C-27s. The USA was stupid to get rid of our after Howard was shut down. There was a lot of missions we did in the Herk that could have used a much smaller aircraft.

    The E/H/K type guys so not like the J models for many reasons. The main is safety. Why pull out two guys out of the Flight deck that can clear you on low levels. When flying low I was always in the windows right in back of the Pilot and the Nav was in the windows right in back of the Co-pilot. This way, they can fly the plane and the other guys can clear the aircraft. In the J model, you have to fly with either more loadmasters (there is always a shortage of loadmasters) or two more pilots (that gets expensive)

    Another reason, maintiance…those props get damages easily (especially in the dirt)

    There is much more but I will go into it later

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 208 total)