Yeah, they’re great pics.
Unfortunately, the planes look like sh!t.
They could’ve at least painted them before they were delivered.:rolleyes:Do Western nations typically deliver BRAND NEW (well maybe new) airplanes without a paint job like that?
You’d think with all the recent controversy surrounding Vikramaditya the Russians would at least throw in a decent custom paint job for the migs.
YOU ARE RIGHT!! GOD DAMMIT!!
Courtesy of Mr. Paralay & his chums:
[ATTACH]161273[/ATTACH]
Pics of IN’s first series produced MiG-29KUB (first flight 18/03):
Russian Bear (Stearns).
[ATTACH]161264[/ATTACH]
medal64, actually it is confirmed that in the earlier part of this decade, China had refused to partner/fund Russia’s FGFA programme (not particularly the PAK-fa), because it was pursuing its own J-XX programme.
I think MiG/TsAGI approached the Chinese in an effort to recoup some of their huge expenses in their FGFA programme (probably MiG 1.44 or a derivative). In fact rumour has it much of MiG’s efforts will be in J-XX, moreso even than JF-17.
I don’t believe that Sukhoi approached the Chinese with the T-50 at any time.
Humorous addenda: The link for post #2 regarding Indo-Russian FGFA has done an NPO Saturn and removed the ‘Blue Raptorski’ pic from it’s article & inserted an Su-30!!…it may mean nothing but…
LOL! Thats what I was thinking! 😀
Anyway, could this be the Phalcon MKI
Yes, pics taken at Taganrog prior to delivery to IAI for installation of Phalcon.
I presume the radome is fixed?
Otaku, the $8 billion ‘contribution’ from India may practically only be the licence manufacturing fee, in the “disguise” of contribution.
So the fee is for IPRs for local manufacture by HAL, and not merely the assembly of kits?
Su-34 has fixed inlets too…speaking of which, I think the IAF should place an order for a couple of dozen and forget about Tu-22M aspirations.
Doesn’t Boeing’s appeal (via the hugely influential GAO) ensure that Congress has the final word?
Doesn’t Boeing hold huge sway in Congress?…maybe not done & dusted then.
Went right over my head, yep.
What are we talking about now? Mid-air rearming? :confused:
Come on LoofahBoy, keep up!!
It’s our resident Delphic Oracle of Aviation again- see thread ‘Should the UK get the F-35C’ post#19.
Israeli armour was hardly decimated.;) Very very small numbers in Iraq, almost certainly black market and not provided by Iran , possibly even old Iraqi stocks.
Sorry 2 mistakes: Kornet-E & Metis-M came from Syria not Iran, destined for Hizbullah (not Hamas- I always get my fanatical muslim pseudo-terrorist organisations confused). Apologies.
Anyways, best let this go before RobL blows a fuse.
Yeah yeah …like you dissected why LCA is glorified Mirage III:D
Well, that’s the ISI’s finest for you…
That’s obviously isn’t it. I think it was clear from the beginning, that the Indian PAK FA would differ in terms of avionics only and that India wouldn’t be able to contribute anything else, as Sukhois development efforts are to advanced.
It may have been clear to those who could read-between-the-lines, but to their respective publics it was being spun as -at best a new project (esp. in India) and at worst a PAK-FA spin-off.
Even on Russian forums last month the query was why were Indian MoD/AF/HAL officials being shown PAK-FA assembly at YG KnAAPO if that ‘jv’ was another project.
Anyways, PAK-FA MKI sounds cool to me. Congrats to Abhimanyu for being spot on months ago. Any word on what the hefty $8 billion Indian ‘contribution’ will be spent on? Does it include aircraft batches?
Dont read too much into that. Very few modern systems were found in Lebanon and even less in Iraq (it is actually still disputable as to how many with zero not being an impossible figure.).
We’re way-off topic but SA-14/16s were used to down US choppers- there’s even YouTube footage of a AH-64D, sea-stallion, blackhawks being hit. From which porous border they came or if they were chinese copies is uncertain.
Iranian supplied Kornet-Es decimated Israeli armour in S. Lebanon a few summers ago, and crate stacks of the less capable AT-5s were shown on Israeli news in captured hamas bunkers.
Criminal smugglers like Victor Bout might be, but I doubt any officially sanctioned arms sales are happening. That would be way too big a can of worms for them at this point.
Russian MANPADS sales to Syria & ATGMs to Iran didn’t come with end-user agreements, as so rudely dicovered by the US in Iraq & the IDF in Lebanon.
Having said that, they do co-operate in ‘stings’ & spoilers- like with the AlQ SA-16s with inert training rounds in Kenya.