dark light

chippie51

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 167 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAF WW2 Trolley Accumulators #1097202
    chippie51
    Participant

    Trolly-Acc

    We have a post-was trolly-acc at our hangar in Suffolk. You’re more than welcome to come and take a look.

    George

    in reply to: Piston Provost Parts Wanted for a Return to Flight #799373
    chippie51
    Participant

    Hi, yes, I’m in contact with the gentleman concerned and we shall be meeting up shortly.

    in reply to: Sea Fury’s – why different wheels? #799879
    chippie51
    Participant

    Not sure if the are Lear Jet. The standard wheel/hydraulic brake conversion, in the US anyway, seems to be based around surplus F-102 Delta Daggar wheels. I guess they fitted well from a size perspective and were available cheap and in quantity, at least at the time.

    in reply to: Sir Adrian Swire #781434
    chippie51
    Participant

    A great shame. His association with MH434 has been for a great deal longer than most realise.

    in reply to: For Percival Provost Experts #793283
    chippie51
    Participant

    Thanks Sycamore. Google? Frequently yes, this occasion, sadly not.

    in reply to: For Percival Provost Experts #793472
    chippie51
    Participant

    Interesting, thanks Sycamore. The antennas are the same, and I’m not sure how any direction indication would be obtained from the aerial atop the fuselage. Additionally, there is no provision for a Beam Approach Indicator or L/R indicator in the cockpit.

    in reply to: For Percival Provost Experts #793478
    chippie51
    Participant

    Hi Scrooge,

    Certainly an aerial under the port wing, in addition to the (seemingly VHF) aerial atop the fuselage. Both highlighted in this photo taken from another thread on the wonderful Pist Prov
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261873[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Update from 'The People's Mosquito' #795322
    chippie51
    Participant

    I saw all the parts that were recovered from the Coltishall dump. All were knackered, too far gone for use. There were some cannon ports and some exhaust stubs which came out of the dump which were OK, but there were dozens of each, and looked to be spares stock rather than from a particular airframe.

    in reply to: For Percival Provost Experts #795626
    chippie51
    Participant

    Hello, I was interested to come across this fascinating thread. I have a question. I have noticed that Piston Provosts have a whip antenna on top of the fuselage and another under the port wing. Were two radios fitted, or was this above and bellow arrangement run from a single radio by way of a splitter?

    in reply to: Hurricane BE505 to be converted into a two seater! #829163
    chippie51
    Participant

    There was a huge amount of radio gear, potential for camera equipment, armour plate etc which can be pulled out from behind a pilots seat to create the leeway for a further body back there. If I remember correctly the battery tray is roughly where the second seat would go and could be re-located, so I’m sure the calculations would be favourable to the modification.

    in reply to: Hurricane BE505 to be converted into a two seater! #829167
    chippie51
    Participant

    Yes it is, as my bank account sadly stands witness to. Safety still has to come before all else, however, particularly a set of P&L results.

    in reply to: Hurricane BE505 to be converted into a two seater! #829313
    chippie51
    Participant

    Hi Bruce, yes, from an engineering perspective very straightforward. I believe that the Vickers TR9 Spitfires had a rudimentary roll-over pylon (granted not very substantial and I wouldn’t wish to rely on it!) behind the rear seat. As they stand I don’t believe any of the existing two seat Hurricane options have that. However with the correct stress and design analysis not difficult to incorporate.

    I’m not sure that whether the aircraft were being used for pilot training would colour the CAA view. In fact they may take the opposite view and be inclined to accept that one being used for pilot training and conversion where the trainee is already an experienced pilot and therefore fully aware of and accepting of the associated risks, is less in need of roll-over protection than one being used for carrying around members of the public who are there only on board for a leisurely £800 Sunday afternoon bimble around. It’s down to perception and acceptance of risk.

    in reply to: Hurricane BE505 to be converted into a two seater! #829361
    chippie51
    Participant

    That two canopied photo was doing the rounds when the original incarnation was proposed a few years ago when HR obtained the Steve Milnthorpe airframe with a two seater in mind. What hasn’t been considered in the thread yet is the practicality of certification. While no means guaranteed it is possible that CAA will require some form of roll-over protection, especially if she will be taking part in the semi-commercial world of paid pleasure flights. Any final configuration will likely, and rightly, be a compromise between PAX safety and historical accuracy. Regardless, it’ll be interesting to see.

    in reply to: Hurricane BE505 to be converted into a two seater! #829386
    chippie51
    Participant

    It’ll be interesting to see, although of possible marginal practical use in the UK/Northern Europe. A 200 mph open cockpit in the Western Desert or Middle East – not a bad way of scooting around. But in Europe, even in the most balmy of summers? Now, I enjoy open cockpit flying, but I think I’d pass after a couple of circuits once curiosity had been satisfied.

    in reply to: Auster Wing Mounted Generators #802247
    chippie51
    Participant

    While on the subject of Auster wing matters, does anyone have a set of early wings available, suitable for a Plus D, or even just a set of wing ribs? The wings that came with it are in pretty awful condition and would rebuild for a static, but are not usable for our needs. Thank you.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 167 total)