dark light

PLA-MKII

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Iranian Saeqeh: What is the verdict? #2259123
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I don’t know how many they have. Could be anywhere from 10-50. Well, if we can discuss Brazil’s handful of the latest refurbished F-5s…

    in reply to: GENERAL UAV/UCAV NEWS AND DISCUSSION THREAD II #2259212
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    That’s what I’ve seen being used for non-metallic LP fan blades.

    One can use wood, or other composites, for propellors. They’ll still have quite a big RCS. You can’t use any stealthy shaping, or it wouldn’t work as a propellor & the rotation guarantees reflections from just about any angle.

    Works for AK-47 toting mud hut dwellers, as djcross says, but everyone else will see it.

    As far as I recall, wood doesn’t reflect radar, radar waves pass through them, at least balsa, don’t know about others.

    in reply to: How to Publish an Ideal Aviation Book on a Fighter #2259219
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    some one is going to pirate it whether its me or not.
    he will take a loss anyways as Deino said.
    he’s doing it for his love for the jf-17 which if he’s willing to pay for, is fine.

    Why I am doing it is above and beyond my “love” of the JF-17. I definitely don’t intend to take a loss. Deino said you don’t make enough money, not you don’t make money at all… I expect there is a probability of making a loss but that’s different from going in knowing I’d make a loss.

    Anyways, there are higher philosophical-sociological-political reasons for the project.

    in reply to: The Iranian Saeqeh: What is the verdict? #2259222
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Alright, now that we’re done with the political wrant, can we discuss objectively the Saeqeh?

    Here is something to get the wheels moving:

    http://en.trend.az/regions/iran/1936646.html

    These were the first 5 delivered DATED 2009.

    http://www.iraniandefence.com/gallery/data/536/Saeqeh_Iran_Fighter_Aircraft4.jpg

    in reply to: The Iranian Saeqeh: What is the verdict? #2259533
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Plenty of pictures floating around, and no, not one but quite a few of them with those boxy intakes… come on guys, we can do better!

    in reply to: Lets help Iran design a stealth fighter/bomber :D #2259668
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I would go with a smaller and aerodynamically more stable version of the F117. High focus of shape, very simple RAM and small internal bay. Very crude, very conservative design but enough to cause some fear!

    This sounds like the best plan but its not a fighter… Nevertheless, would be potentially within their reach.

    I think that the F-117 originally was built in a smaller scale using T-38 engines.

    in reply to: Lets help Iran design a stealth fighter/bomber :D #2259680
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    unless they’re flown by western Mercs as is the case with a few of their aircraft.

    so, how is the F-7 superior to Iran’s F-5 clones?

    J-7G versus typical F-5 (not the tigershark)

    Aerodynamics, better, newer technology flight controls, FCS, avionics, superior kinematics, significantly higher TWR.

    Here is some info on the J-7G

    http://www.pakdef.org/pakmilitary/airforce/ac/f7pg.htm

    And if you don’t like Pakdef (which is according to you not reliable source of information) then AFM Sept 2003 may help 😉

    in reply to: list of combat aircraft flight cost per hour #2259685
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    We missed out on the JF-17 CPFH. According to recent statements by the PAF, 1/3rd the cost of a modern fighter, presuming that is approximately the F-16 its 5000/3 = 1,667. That’s half that of the Gripen!

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2260093
    PLA-MKII
    Participant
    in reply to: How to Publish an Ideal Aviation Book on a Fighter #2260200
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Thanks a89, Krishna_j and halloweene, these are all great suggestions.

    I’ll work on:

    1. Trying to get interviews (although as I’m based presently in South East Asia, its a long flight, maybe I can get someone in Pakistan to do it for me… but that becomes an even longer shot…)

    2. If I can get #1, I could perhaps get hold of some more reliable data or confirm the data we have accumulated in the various forums and sites.

    3. Deino’s work is definitely an inspiration, and its always good to look at what has worked. I’ll definitely take a look at that and other successful coffee table books on aviation.

    Y20 Bacon, thank you for your attempts at humour, somewhere you’ve also attempted to give me some good advice, I’ll try to extract that at some point.

    Progress:

    I’m considering an 8.5×11 inch coffee table book with loads of pretty pictures but also something like a story book which tells the story of the JF-17, starting from a historical perspective, moving on to the program, and the people behind that program. Then moving on to whatever specs can be put up with some level of certainty, without going into too much controversy. And since I’m the author, I’d like a final small section on speculations and controversies, but I’m still mulling over this part.

    in reply to: Would F-35 make sense for India in 2020-2030 period? #2260779
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Hi Scooter, yes I agree, the F-35 makes more sense. Consider that it does not have to be high maintenance, IAF can go for a lower maintenance version that sacrifices some stealth for a more robust operation.

    Even an F-35 skelaton fleshed with F-16 Block 70 / SH subsystems (and parts from all over the world) would be a cheaper and very capable platform with a better development path than the Rafale which increasingly looks like a dead end.

    in reply to: How to Publish an Ideal Aviation Book on a Fighter #2261081
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Thanks Deino and benhongh,

    I read your inputs with most interest. Benhongh – I’m going to try and do the JF-17 because I have followed it for a long time (since 2002 and the S-7 program since the mid 90s) and have a knowledge base on it that, I dare say, can rival almost anyone outside the “inside information” group.

    My biggest weakness would be I am too invested, too close to the project, and as such must have biases that I cannot myself perceive. Getting pictures would be the big task, getting all the copyrights and so forth. I’ve never had to do that before.

    Deino –

    Thanks, yes I will most certainly contact you further. I think your books are really great and I would think it a big success even if mine was half as good.

    I’ve already figured out global distribution through Amazon and other major sellers (something I did from my past experience with having published two other non-aviation related books). So I don’t have to worry about physically selling units.

    I do want to keep it less controversial but not non-controversial – its a nearly impossible task trying to please both the JF-17 as the panacea of military aviation (of whom I’m myself an example of) and the JF-17 – failed project that’s really a MiG-21 Or MiG-33, or F-5, or an F-16 ripoff (don’t sell Pakistan F-16s, didn’t we tell you?) crowd.

    So that leaves me with trying to walk a middle line somewhere. Since I’m targeting a coffee book style hard cover, I think pictures would be the key – great pictures and a narrative of the development process. That’s what I really want – a narrative of what happened, how it happened, who said what,… where the program was headed, how it was perceived… what went wrong… what went right… combine that with full size images…

    That’s the basic idea I have for now…

    in reply to: How to Publish an Ideal Aviation Book on a Fighter #2261170
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Hehe 😀

    Made my day. Thanks Y-20 Bacon, you’re too kind. By the Grace of Allah I am financially comfortable enough to not need to sell my car to publish the book 😉

    Point 6 scares me the most.

    in reply to: Lets help Iran design a stealth fighter/bomber :D #2261182
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Or even better spend money on nuclear development, which is what they have done.

    The Iranians didn’t like the F-7 either and only acquired a handful which are used for operational conversion and which were acquired at a point when they were deperate.

    And even upgraded, the F-7 does not stand a chance against advanced Arab jets guided in by AWACS. Or even worse US jets supported by AWACS, cruise missiles, stealth bomber strikes and massive electronic warfare capability.

    Problem is, jets flown by Saudi Arabia or the like are errrr…. not very professionally flown. Also, they are too fat and comfortable to pick a fight with anyone directly.

    in reply to: Would F-35 make sense for India in 2020-2030 period? #2261190
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    The happiest solution IMHO would be to combine the AMCA and a F-35 purchase.

    1. US would bend over backwards for India to purchase her jet. Make them bend a bit more, play the China card.

    2. Get local manufacturing of a fighter based on the F-35. Basically an Indian-ized avionics and electronics, an open architecture affair with global and parts sourcing. May even turn out better in some ways than the F-35.
    A simplified F-35 may actually be better than the present over-complexity in actual operational use.

    3. Keep the LCA, its come too far to be stopped now. 30 years of development… “too big to fail” Add some LEVCONs to fix the AoA problem and improve agility.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 1,462 total)