dark light

PLA-MKII

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinook Vs. Stallion #2424802
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Some Boeing propaganda for your personal perusal:

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2009/01/boeing-presentation-to-iaf-comparing.html

    Disclaimer: Not responsible for what Boeing is saying about its products. It’s like trying to get info for the F-22 😉

    in reply to: Chinook Vs. Stallion #2425301
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Apparently Chinooks can operate in far worse weather conditions at sea than Stallions can imagine to. But that may be Chinook propaganda or heresy 🙂

    in reply to: Chinook Vs. Stallion #2425433
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    wow thats quite a giant..

    However, given that both the Stallion and the Chinook have similar sizes, I was thinking more in the line of a more powerful engine. But its a good point that the tail cannot be folded and thus the larger footprint.. still seems like the long list of benefits of the Chinook – including being able to operate in rough sea conditions that the Stallion cannot imagine, or this interesting post about floating… hmmm makes one wonder.

    in reply to: Chinook Vs. Stallion #2425681
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Okay so faster and greater pay loads and easier maneuverability for the Stallion. Ship borne capability is of course an addition.

    Yet I was thinking that there may be a case for simply building a more powerful Chinook (and giving it shipborne capabilities). Would not a single type have made more sense financially? Was it inter-services rivalry?

    in reply to: Chinook Vs. Stallion #2425810
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Maintenance vs. tactical capability ???

    cheaper vs ?

    economies of scale vs economies of scope ???

    in reply to: Wild Weasel Aircraft of the world and there roles #2433106
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    What interests me is that very few third world airforces have any serious SEAD/DEAD capability. An exception comes to mind in the Mirages of the Pakistan Air Force armed with Braziliam mar-1s. Darn, thats DEAD not SEAD. I doubt even China has competent dedicated SEAD aircraft yet.

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2492991
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    No, I think he is also blaming me, and I doubt I’d look similar 🙂

    Its a blanket statement, including anyone he wants to include of course

    in reply to: Sri Lanka Aircraft #2501894
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    F-7Gs if China can spare any. I really think its the perfect aircraft for countries like Bangladesh and Sri-Lanka. They’ll regre the FULCRUM if they buy ’em! Maintenance is a nightmare. Ask the Bangladesh air force.

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2503637
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    ???? … but not that strange model above, that’s clearly an US project (don’t know the real name, but it is one !)

    Deino

    True, I too recognize it (but can’t name it). Still, it “technically” qualifies as speculation 😀

    PS: Cheers and thanks for posting, DongDong2. Love the video

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2504038
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    well, I’m just glad to see some speculation on a single engined 5th gen. I think this has been one hell of a blind spot vis-a-vis the MiG-E and whatever China makes (if it does at all)

    in reply to: General Discussion #342259
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Have Danika as the female Stig.

    in reply to: Top Gear sexist…never!!! #1913326
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Have Danika as the female Stig.

    in reply to: Manchester-Islamabad (with PIA) #403436
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Nice Report!

    By the way, the “To Let” does not have an “i” missing, it means that there is space to lease!

    PS: This apparently is my 666th post

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2447893
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    The difference is SAAB has got a great track record spanning over 50 years. Sweden as a whole, got a a great track record. Does India have that, in anything they have tried to produce?

    It doesn’t need a track record, it has over 2 and half decades of experience in the LCA development. You have to admit thats a lot of experience, far more than Saab has on the Gripen or on any particular combat aircraft!

    I am certain that with a few more billion dollars and a decade more in development, everything will turn out all right. India just has to have patience and hold on, when there is nothing left in you, except for the will which says, “hold on!”

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2452177
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    The difference is SAAB has got a great track record spanning over 50 years. Sweden as a whole, got a a great track record. Does India have that, in anything they have tried to produce?

    It doesn’t need a track record, it has over 2 and half decades of experience in the LCA development. You have to admit thats a lot of experience, far more than Saab has on the Gripen or on any particular combat aircraft!

    I am certain that with a few more billion dollars and a decade more in development, everything will turn out all right. India just has to have patience and hold on, when there is nothing left in you, except for the will which says, “hold on!”

Viewing 15 posts - 826 through 840 (of 1,462 total)