dark light

PLA-MKII

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Oh No, not again! #2544165
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Well said Pioneer! I think a most well thought out post indeed.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #9, for Pictures and Discussion. #2544210
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I wonder when the Malaysians got those

    in reply to: Putin cans CFE #2544215
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    The CFE itself is obsolete and withdrawing from it is no way significant, UNLESS we consider it from a broader political perspective. one must realize that it perhaps signifies turning point in Russian policy, one from protesting and making exception and other such diplomatic nonsense to one of actually taking action.

    in reply to: Oh No, not again! #2544220
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Well, then pay a lot more for them and run the risk of potatoe diseases every now and then. It’s for a good cause! White Man’s Burden doesn’t come for free though… And as i’ve said before: do a lot of speed in front of a speeding cameras. Smoke a lot, or at least buy huge quantities of cigarettes. Buy a less fuel-efficient car. It will all help you achieve your goal of a better funded military.

    You seem to be a member of the GWB School of Economics: lower the taxes in order to increase defense spending. Remember that the very founder of that economic thesis has ran quite a number of companies aground…

    I think in certain circumstances it might be okay to do that: for instance if you can create all the dollars you like and have hapless foreigners sell goods and keep endless reserves of dollars for fiat money. This is a good opportunity for the rest of the world to show their spirit in supporting Freedom and killing Iraqi terrorists who bombed WTC. The Bretton Woods agreement, where the world took on the US dollar as the traded currency on the basis of promises that they would hold it to gold was just that – an agreement on a piece of paper, now not even worth using as toilet paper.

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world #2544609
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    City to host fighter planes for IAF exercise

    Wonderful Tango, this is one of my most favorite threads.

    Thiruvananthapuram: Six Mirage 2000 fighter aircraft of the Indian Air Force (IAF) will arrive in the city on Thursday to participate in a massive air combat exercise over the southern Peninsula scheduled to be held in the first week of December.

    The French-built light-weight fighter aircraft are expected to touch down at the IAF’s technical area inside the airport at 2.30 p.m. The fighters are based in Gwalior in Madhya Pradesh.

    The IAF operations will not affect domestic and international flights from the city. The Kerala component of the exercise will start on December 3 and conclude on December 5. The fighters will be flying mostly beyond visual range and the combat exercises will be mainly over the sea.

    However, residents could expect to hear the distant rumble of fighter jets and possibly see some combat aircraft streaking overhead. The complex air combat drills will be held mostly in the morning and early afternoon. There could also be some night flying.

    The exercise has been code named ‘Dakshin Prahar’ and will cover the skies over Bangalore and the island territories of Lakshadweep and Minicoy. It will help the IAF gauge its reach over the seas and also test how well military and civilian assets (chiefly radars and airfields) have been integrated for better air defence surveillance.

    Six British-French built Jaguar ground attack aircraft and an unknown number of Sukhoi 30 MKIs (IAF’s Russian-built long-range, heavy-class, multi-role air superiority strike fighter) will participate in the exercise.

    The Jaguars will take off from the Arakkonam Naval Air base near Chennai. The Sukhois, supported by Russian-built IL-78 airborne fuel tankers for mid-air refuelling, will fly down for the exercise from their home base in Bareilly in Uttar Pradesh.

    The IAF will be deploying Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for surveillance and reconnaissance and possibly also as air-borne targets for the fighters.

    The UAVs will be operated remotely by controllers in IAF bases in Sulur and Tanjavur in Tamil Nadu.

    ‘Dakshin Prahar’ signifies the growing strategic importance of the Southern Air Command (SAC). The exercise is of great importance to the IAF, particularly in the wake of reports that certain non-State actors in the region have acquired minimal air-combat capability.

    Certain components of the IAF, most likely the Jaguars, will be mimicking the role of invading aircraft.

    The Mirage 2000s and the Sukhois will play the role of interceptors. The aircraft will engage each other in simulated dog fights. The exercise will also test the IAF’s reconnaissance and ground attack capabilities in maritime conditions.

    The Indian Navy has committed some of its assets for the operation for testing its ‘inter-operability levels with the IAF. The second phase of the exercise will cover the northern part of the peninsula (from Hyderabad to south of Nagpur).

    http://www.hindu.com/2007/11/29/stories/2007112960340300.htm

    in reply to: elastic wing #2544793
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Some stealthy UAV. Even Global Hawk.
    Nobody to look out of the window and get scared. 😀

    Exactly the impression I remember from reading the pilot’s description of the fluttering wings 😀

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #9, for Pictures and Discussion. #2544798
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    BAF
    Bangladesh Air Force
    from bdmilitary.com

    If you pay careful attention you might find something interesting.. 😉

    in reply to: elastic wing #2545159
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I recall that the USAF study found that they weren’t very effective. Also that the pilots testing them out felt strange seeing the wings flutter so violently

    in reply to: F-16XL #2545169
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    heres what they had planned for the F-16E/F block 60 originally…

    Do you mean this? (couldn’t see it but saw the link while replying).

    http://afbase.com/bbs/data/gaga/1156827351/block60earlyscalemodel.jpg

    in reply to: Distiller's demand – UK get out of JSF! #2545371
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    With reference to Iraq, whatever the rights and wrongs of the war in the first place, in practice the US/UK occupation has been an unmitigated disaster and virtually the whole world sees us as more part of the problem than part of the solution. What the UK is doing in Basra is somewhat ignominious and a sign of failure, but it’s hard to find any argument about Iraq that doesn’t stink if failure for our countries and at some point you have to decide enough is enough and look for a way out. How many people here think the next US administration will hang around in Iraq with an open ended committment? As soon as GWB is out I’m guessing US troops in Iraq will start doing what the British are currently doing, a phased withdrawal, and they’d be crazy not to IMO.

    Well, I think that the UK is being far from ignominious. One thing that the British have learnt over its long reign on a good part of the world is to know when to retreat. If you can’t win, you either change tack or you move out and fight another battle at your own choosing. Of course if you delay it, you end up with the type of retreat (when it finally comes) like the US in Vietnam.

    in reply to: Distiller's demand – UK get out of JSF! #2545429
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    If you find a good politician, shoot him before he turns bad.

    Or before he stops Israel’s nuclear program 😉

    The fact that the USA constantly insists on carelessly restraining itself on the battlefield never helps matters either.

    Thats highly debatable. I’d say more the opposite, shooting civilians on sight.

    Overall, I think Distiller has it right, but only about say 10 years ago at least. The UK has already been hoodwinked dear Distiller, now there is no time to develop an alternative to the F-35. Say “thank you” and “please” to America and be happy in an alternative Orwellian 1984.

    in reply to: F-16XL #2545445
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    The F-16XL was a very interesting and potent concept and I dare say would have been implemented had LM thought in taking the F-16 further. However, at the opportune time, the F-35 funding campaign came up, effectively taking out the F-16’s future developments.

    Those wings would have been ideal for the block 50/52s and the block 60s and I’d guess would have brought in a good number of export orders. However, if the F-35 turns out right, it will make up and then some.

    in reply to: Just a coincidence? Sneaky yanks! #2546751
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    mabie, I don’t think its that simple.. cell phones with gps are made to be picked up and so are satellite phones.. the latter was learnt at great expense by the Taliban during the initial phase of the war..

    in reply to: Just a coincidence? Sneaky yanks! #2547704
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    I concede, I made that comment more light heartedly, I’m sure there is enough trust going around at the military level. After all, if the British military can’t be trusted then who else would the US trust? 🙂

    in reply to: Just a coincidence? Sneaky yanks! #2547716
    PLA-MKII
    Participant

    Please, I’ve worked with individuals from numerous different nations including the UK (including some Ukrainian SOF types in Iraq, that resulted in a hugely hilarious tale involving the Mi-24), and despite what often gets played up in the press from the political side, there is a great deal of respect and cooperation from the military side of the house that often gets overlooked when people latch onto the latest BBC or CNN story involving political antics by one side or the other.

    SOC, thats true, I’m sure, and I’m sure you know a good deal about it being in the USAF. Yet at times Brits do get really flabbergasted with some of the antiques – one example is the F-35.

    And I guess right now a good part of the British population is blaming the US for dragging them into Iraq, what with all the “secrets revealed” dirty laundry flying around.

    In the end, I’d think the USAF would want its own plane monitoring.. Its almost an organizational / bureaucratic mindset and I’m sure you have had first hand experience of that.

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,462 total)