dark light

Matt-100

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CSeries launch customer #516856
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Are Embraer any closer to launching a 190 stretch?

    As Tom Enders pointed out last month with regard to the 777X, the problem with stretches of already stretched aircraft is the extra weight increases exponentially (as in many cases the original fuselage, wings etc. need to have numerous supports and reinforcements along the frame to cope with the additional length). This extra weight means the stretch of a stretch design can’t compete with dedicated, originally designed airframes.
    (Just look at how overweight the 748 ended up being and the problems Boeing had with that, and the problems Airbus had with the shrink of a shrink A318).

    If Embraer did further stretch the E-Series, it won’t be able to compete with the C-Series due to it’s weight.

    in reply to: Fantastic Lion Air order Airbus! #516860
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Am I the only one who thinks poor previous safety record + rapidly expanding airline = recipe for disaster?
    Definitely an airline I’ll be actively seeking to avoid should I ever visit Indonesia.

    How many crashes has that airline had over the past 10 years? Or even over the past year?
    I always love going onto the aviation herald to check up on which airport has had the weekly lionair overrun 😀

    in reply to: Concorde G-BOAA@East Fortune 10th March 2013 #443461
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Interesting, you’re right it would appear Concorde ran with Chevron M2V hydraulic fluid. The last batch was sent to AF in 2003 and is now an extremely scarce resource. However, there is a restoration project on G-BOAC at the moment, http://www.concordeprojectflagship.com/pumping.php

    in reply to: Concorde G-BOAA@East Fortune 10th March 2013 #443520
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Fantastic shots Robert!

    I wonder how air worthy she is? I notice she’s still got all her interior fixtures? If BA could get permission to do a one off return flight to JFK, I can imagine there’s some serious money to be made. But she’s probably grounded for good 🙁

    in reply to: Lufthansa orders A320, A380, 777 #517060
    Matt-100
    Participant

    My guess is the 748i is too much metal for Swiss. The 77W will provide a modest increase in capacity over the A340-300, whilst providing the efficiency of a twin engined aircraft.

    And the scale of new orders these days is baffling. Just as far back as a couple of years ago, a truly “mega” order would be anything north of 200 aircraft. Now it’s not unheard of for airlines to order 400+ in a single day.

    in reply to: General Discussion #248707
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Looking at the trailer you wouldn’t think it was a kids film, but one for folks like us 😀

    Matt-100
    Participant

    Looking at the trailer you wouldn’t think it was a kids film, but one for folks like us 😀

    in reply to: Did the FAA jump the gun on Harlem Shake? #517223
    Matt-100
    Participant

    What difference does it make if it were a Turbo-Prop??

    Well, they’re smaller and lighter so coordinated movements in the cabin can have a larger effect on flight stability. Don’t quote me on that, I’m no expert, perhaps Deano could comment?
    But this crash springs to mind
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Bandundu_Filair_Let_L-410_crash

    in reply to: Ryanair to announce 200-plane Boeing deal #517252
    Matt-100
    Participant

    The Irish Independent said the deal would be worth $18 Billion

    Excuse me while I have a little chuckle! 😀 I highly doubt they’ll be paying $90 million a pop for those; and if they are, Michael’s letting the side down on this one…

    That aside, how cheaply do you reckon FR are getting these 737s for? As Threespool points out, these will most likely be last off the line frames before the NG is superseded by the MAX; so I’d imagine a hefty discount for that – no one likes being the last one to buy a discontinued model (unless you’re Ryanair and you’re in it for the discount :D).

    in reply to: Virgin Atlantic Facing Record Losses #517369
    Matt-100
    Participant

    I didn’t mention it earlier but, staff cuts??
    VS has roughly 9000 employees, BA has roughly 38,000. So Virgin have roughly 1/4 the staff, but are they really 1/4 the size? I would expect to see a pay freeze at the very least.
    Also, could they not outsource heavy maintenance? I’m not sure how efficient an operation the VS engineering team is but management should at least analyse the alternatives.

    I don’t think Virgin has any clear direction any more. What’s their ambition, where do they want to go, where do they see themselves in 10 years time? This, unfortunately, is where the airline has lost its way. When it was founded in 1985 it was a real groundbreaker and culture shock for the established mainstream. Now it seems all they do is shadow BA’s moves, which wouldn’t be so bad if they could actually offer a better product. They can’t. It’s about time management (SRB) stops peering over the fence to see what BA’s doing and come up with their own ideas.

    Whilst not my airline of choice, I certainly wouldn’t want them to go. Who’ll be there to keep BA in check? :diablo: and it always brings a smile to my face when I see the brightly coloured air hostesses at the terminal (they really do stand out just like how they’re portrayed in the television ads)

    in reply to: Virgin Atlantic Facing Record Losses #517383
    Matt-100
    Participant

    I agree on the most part with your suggestions, Little Red never will be profitable even with the lucrative connections it may bring… The sooner VS realise that, the better. But code-sharing with BA? Let’s get real Doors, this is SRB we’re talking about 😀

    I too would ditch the 747s and A340-300s, cancel the A380s and defer delivery on 787s until things start to pick up.

    But most importantly, the route network needs a major shake up. Ditch all non-profitable routes (I’m guessing these include Tokyo, Sydney, Lagos, Accra and the new Vancouver) and replace them with new routes to emerging markets. China, for example, is very under-served at LHR with practically no direct competition on secondary cities in the country. Also, they don’t fly to Latin America… why? Surely Sao Paulo or Rio is higher up the priority list when it comes to new routes than YVR (as nice as the city is)?

    in reply to: Qantas planes fly in Iran! #517582
    Matt-100
    Participant

    A great read. This is them now;
    http://www.planes.cz/photo/1143/1143605/b747-338-c5-sam-al-sayegh-airlines-ras-al-khaimah-rkt-omrk.jpg

    in reply to: Los Madrileños (MAN 5/3/2013) #443643
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Impressive catches, good work 🙂
    One can only imagine what the atmosphere must have been like on the return flights?

    in reply to: Iraqi Airways news. #517591
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Unfortunately the A330’s interior is just as disastrous as the paint work. It’s like they’ve taken all the colour off the livery, thrown it in a blender for 5 minutes and chucked it in the cabin. I mean; I wasn’t expecting anything other than the Airbus designed default seats, but those colours! 🙁
    Still, at least it’s a brand new aircraft, which is a bonus (although, I’m not impressed with the 3-3-3 seating)

    http://www.youshouldtravel.com/iraqiairways/

    in reply to: Iraqi Airways news. #517629
    Matt-100
    Participant

    Great news, a sign that the country is finally returning to normality (not that many citizens would remember what that was) after decades of decline in the hands of a murderer. Well done IA and well done Iraq!

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 614 total)