dark light

carl727uk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 222 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AirAsia X to Perth #535009
    carl727uk
    Participant

    I havent flown Air Asia, so not sure what they are like, but i have flown on Tiger airways another LoCo in the area from Singapore to Perth. Whilst the southbound flight from SIN was ok, and refreshingly the food you could purchase on board whilst not wonderful, it was not expensive like many UK LoCos, the northbound flight from Perth departing at 21.00 was very uncomfortable, you arrive at the Singapore Budget terminal (which actually is fine too) at an ungodly hour.

    Air Asia maybe a bit better, all I would say is 5 hours on a LoCo is stretching it.

    in reply to: LBA – New York JET2 its Official #535513
    carl727uk
    Participant

    Lets hope they operate it better than flyglobespan’s attempt from Liverpool last year which was a bit of mess

    carl727uk
    Participant

    Just returned from Perth and Singapore, booked with Swiss about a year ago. Connection via Zurich was brilliant, no hiccups and no nightmare LHR, especially now, thank go I didnt travel with BA via term 5.

    in reply to: British "London" Airways.. #554748
    carl727uk
    Participant

    I agree with what you have just wrote “Renfrew”. My other thought is that all these UK passengers flying via European points on other national carriers, may not be benefitting the British economy as much as if a British carrier was used via LHR. Having said all that LHR is not a pleasant airport to use, although maybe terminal 5 may help matters.

    Can anyone confirm if BMI are giving up the LHR-INV route for sure ? If so maybe KLM will jump in there with an Amsterdam link ? !

    in reply to: British "London" Airways.. #554757
    carl727uk
    Participant

    The subject of regional connections to LHR is a contentious one. My opinion is the reduction of regional connections over the years to LHR is detrimental to the regions and BA as a “National” carrier and LHR as the national hub of air travel. KLM have huge network of regional connections to many airports that once were connected to LHR e.g Humberside, Birmingham and Norwich. There are many other regional airports that have lost their LHR links over the years and there would seem to be more on the way, possibly Inverness, Tees Side, Leeds Bradford.

    Heathrow is now on the national rail network, but the only link is to Paddington, so again no help for regional cities. With this in mind many passengers, me included will look to other European cities to make their connections which are very often more convenient.

    in reply to: LBA-LHR Under Threat #571314
    carl727uk
    Participant

    I used to work in travel in the 80s when Britsh Midland flew 5 DC9s a day from LHR to LPL. Our travel office put quite a bit of business through them, but the route had stiff competition from BA’s MAN shuttle which was more frequent, plus at the time Liverpool as a City was not doing too well. The train has improved of recent years and its really a better option city centre to city centre, but what is still a real problem is using the train and getting to LHR.

    In my opinion regional air links severed from LHR, just divert passenger to easier hubs like Amsterdam.

    I flew on BMI from MAN to LHR on the last flight of the day on a Friday about 3 weeks back, sat on a very comfortable A319 with about 20 on board.

    in reply to: BA and MAN #572826
    carl727uk
    Participant

    My point is that that is exactly the same in LHR or ZRH. If you misconnect in either, the airline involved will reroute you. The only difference is you have far more options for getting where you want to at LHR than ZRH if things go wrong (which they do frequently).

    well we shall see !!

    in reply to: BA and MAN #573034
    carl727uk
    Participant

    So should we tell SQ to forget about their daily non-stop service? Beggars belief that we create and agitate for foreign airlines to begin regional long-haul services only to find some passengers maintaining the status quo except changing transfer airport away from LHR.

    __

    Nordjet’s post would be okay but for the idea that BA converted profitable franchised airlines into loss-making subsidiaries. Nor does BA help themselves by proudly boasting that they’d base a 777 at MAN for Islamabad services offering increased capacity but pull the route within a couple of years, with the 777 still not having found its way here. If they know they can’t deliver what they promise, they should not go to the media and promote themselves. I hardly think the route went from profitable one year to unprofitable the next? AS for the JFK link, we know that they are embarrassed by it still operating but it steadfastly refuses to make a loss but they believe they’ve now done the right thing by now using the 767s in the wrong configuration: it can’t be the right configuration as for years they’ve denied the idea that regional airports are capable of sustaining three-class aircraft!

    The Swiss service offered me the best price in Business Class and availability when I am travelling, which was why I booked it.

    in reply to: BA and MAN #573271
    carl727uk
    Participant

    Unless your inbound from MAN is running slightly late. The MAN flight is a Fokker which uses a bus gate, adding significant time getting into the main terminal. Couple that with the fact that the MAN flight is habitually 15 minutes late and Swiss close their gates 15 minutes-ish before departure and you’ve got an extremely tight connection with limited options for rebooking.

    Once you’ve missed a connection in a smaller airport like ZRH you won’t bemoan LHR quite as much as you did before. I speak from painful experience! :p

    I still prefer mainland european options over LHR I have never found the MAN-LHR link particularly on-time, as I experienced last Friday evening, with BD (my flight) late and BA having cancelled and delayed services. Two ladies sat behind me transfering onwards to Sydney were concerned about their connection they were on BA. (terminal 5, may improve matters), if i miss the flight in Zurich its down to Swiss.

    in reply to: BA and MAN #573580
    carl727uk
    Participant

    As a N.W England resident using MAN, LPL and occasionally BLK. I avoid flying via LHR as a hub as I find it pretty awful. It must also be said that many regional airports have over the years lost their LHR link not just by BA, NWI,HUY,LPL,PLH,INV,BHX,EMA,NQY..there may be more. I understand LBA and MME have question marks also.

    Many of these airports have good links to Amsterdam for example and KLM and others seem to value feeder services to their hub at Schipol as opposed to Heathrow. Then again AMS and CDG have more runway capacity than LHR.
    In addition the rail link at Heathrow is very limited with a service to London Paddington only. If this was expanded to cover major UK cities, it would draw in more regional passengers which are being lost to Paris, Brussels,Copenhagen and Amsterdam etc.

    Next year I am flying to Singapore from Manchester…………via Zurich with Swiss, one hour connection and avoiding a more stressful alternative at LHR changing terminals etc.

    in reply to: Quite Possibly The Most Stunning MD-11 In The World! #577846
    carl727uk
    Participant

    I do like the MD-11, in fact I liked the DC10s prior to it, and Tristars, 727s, TU 154s and Tridents. In fact Tri-Jets are cool, shame they are disapearing. Not too keen on the colour livery on this MD.

    My fav plane of all time however is the Super VC-10 :).

    in reply to: Globespan to Close LPL n MAN #587504
    carl727uk
    Participant

    Its a shame about the loss of the LPL-JFK link, but flyglobespan, made a huge mess of it, and received a lot of bad press.

    in reply to: Jet2 737-200 #587991
    carl727uk
    Participant

    Eastern Airways

    I see Eastern Airways are re-starting MAN-STN, now Air Berlin are going. They did this route before Air Berlin started on it. FR finished from Blackpool to Stansted as well, so they should do ok.

    in reply to: Jet2 737-200 #587995
    carl727uk
    Participant

    Saw it at BLK on Sunday after returning from Alicante with Jet2.

    in reply to: Air Berlin axe BHD-STN #591940
    carl727uk
    Participant

    I heard Air Berlin will drop MAN-STN too, have used it before, good service, but not very busy. Eastern Airways did do that route before, I wonder if they will go back. No northwest connection to Stansted now, Ryanair dropped BLK-STN. Liverpool has no London link anymore, now VLM have finished, they couldn’t compete with the rail service, and I understand BMI may chop MAN-LHR. The rail now from the northwest to Euston is good, but if you want to connect onwards from a London airport, flying is still easier.

    Air Berlin may have been better offering LPL-STN than MAN, less competition than MAN-LON with flights to LGW/LHR and LCY.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 222 total)