I feel that we are getting alittle carried away with the requirements of the MoD/County archaeologist (CA)…..
the reason we now need to contact them is because they need to know what is going on and where just in case they have anything to offer or disagree with. They have an interest so it is also to inform them. But remember, it is like building an extension, a neighbour can object but if they do not have reasonable grounds to do so then it carries no weight. I believe it is sensible to have to include the CA so that we dont dig a hole right in the middle of something important. This is just like the procedure for digging foundations for a big building…if it interferes with a known site of archaelogical importance, the CA may wish for archaeology to be done.
I wrote my project definition, sent it off, followed it up with a phone call and ticked that box.
It is though (with due respect to the CA) not the CA’s remit to decide whether an aircraft site is historic/worthy or whatever. The fact that someone died in the aircraft doing his duty and the fact that you are doing something to remember him is reason enough.
Regarding your Hadrian wall digs, I am sure that you could even make a case to explore them with the necessary archaeological CA support (just like they do in any big city where even significant archaeological sites wont stop building like Canary Wharf or a big car park).
Neil, your dig sounds fantastic and a chat with the chap, even possibly at the site would show how serious you are. Only my suggestion as ever….
Sign In
