dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The ultimate what-if: Cancelled Spitfire progenitor #980287
    Mark V
    Participant

    Dream on.

    A KON.

    Mark

    More :rolleyes: like A CON! And why give it the name of a Hawker fighter

    in reply to: Three Buchons at Duxford #981414
    Mark V
    Participant

    Thats how I remember it 92fis. I was with the Charles Church collection at that time – myself and Mr Melton arrived at DX on the saturday 10th to prep the Buchon for the following day – it had been at DX for a few weeks prior to that for filming. John Lewis arrived the next morning (of the show) in EE606. Seems a very long time ago now….

    in reply to: New Texan arrives at Staverton #986949
    Mark V
    Participant

    That is very nice but why paint it when Midwest do such an amazing job of polishing?:diablo:

    They only polish when forced to…

    in reply to: New Texan arrives at Staverton #987546
    Mark V
    Participant

    Another magnificent Midwest Aero restoration! Great to see their work in the UK 🙂 Check out the following link (official Midwest site) for 72 build and first flight photos:

    http://midwestaero.com/site/Photo_Gallery/Pages/AT-6D_Texan_Restoration.html#1

    in reply to: Red Tails – a verdict… #996894
    Mark V
    Participant

    I know there was a real DC3 on site but it did look a bit odd compared to the other shots.

    Probably bracuase it was real 😉

    in reply to: Red Tails – a verdict… #997385
    Mark V
    Participant

    Yes there where a few moments where you could clearly see the CGI’s (Dakota on the ground shots) but overall it was a good film.

    There was a real Dakota on set – are you sure it was CGI?

    in reply to: New Spotted For 2012 Season Here #998509
    Mark V
    Participant

    Now heading back to Weald (over Ware at 15.00).

    in reply to: Restoration enquiry #1000575
    Mark V
    Participant

    Isn’t EVERY a/c after the prototype a reproduction….?

    If its made by the original manufacturer – I would say no, its simply a ‘production’ aircraft. A ‘reproduction’ in my view is an aircraft made by another party, after the original series production, that has in some cases necessary variations from the original design, such as the repro FW-190’s and Me-262’s of recent years. In warbird terms a ‘replica’ is simply a ‘look-alike’ that may not even be full-size. Thats how I view it anyway….

    in reply to: Getting new airworthy Spitfire parts made #1002223
    Mark V
    Participant

    Supermarine Engineering in Stoke if you want the finished item to fly on an airworthy UK registered aircraft – or any other similarly CAA approved organisation. I mention them first as they are ‘in to’ Spitfire items, small runs, have the drawings etc.

    in reply to: Restoration enquiry #1002225
    Mark V
    Participant

    Authenticity isn’t their aim, their aim is to keep it in the air.

    I think you are confusing ‘authenticity’ with ‘originality’ – BBMF are very interested in authenticity and have gone to considerbale lengths to improve the Lanc, in that respect, over the years (turrets and more recently ammo track installation to quote two examples).

    in reply to: Contact at RAF Hendon Museum? #1003974
    Mark V
    Participant

    DoRIS – Department of Records & Information Services…. I might be wrong but I think they have already produced DVD’s from their archives.

    in reply to: Planes of Fame in the 1960's #1003976
    Mark V
    Participant

    Wow, a flying Ki-84, what happened to that?

    30 seconds of Googling 😉

    Posted on WIX in 2009: “Yes this is the bird now at the Kamikaze Peace museum in Chiran Japan. “

    in reply to: Planes of Fame in the 1960's #1003977
    Mark V
    Participant

    Fascinating indeed – the PoF ground crew look like extras from Men In Black!

    in reply to: Elstree April 1969 #1006383
    Mark V
    Participant

    The Spitfire is MJ772/G-AVAV and still sporting its last BoB film code CD-N.

    Mark

    So the Spitfire Productions art dept finally got the Fabalon to stick 😉

    in reply to: Restoration enquiry #1006386
    Mark V
    Participant

    John, it was perhaps the way you posted the question – with the assertion that opinion was polarised and there are certain people who ‘would not permit’ any element of new construction or parts in an airworthy restoration. By that I presume you mean they (whoever they may be) simply have the opinion that using new parts is innapropriate or undesirable (rather than referring to some regulation or official ruling/requirement).

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 2,768 total)