dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hangar 11 Spitfire #1120048
    Mark V
    Participant

    Lovely stuff!
    Isn’t the windscreen on BM597?

    Thats what I hear too.

    Looks very nice. How similar is it to the scheme the BBMF Mk 19 is now wearing? Be interesting to see those together.

    The Mk 19 has the standard PR scheme – PL965 has the scheme as modified in January 1945 by 2nd Tactical Air Force directive to change to Type III roundels and re-paint spinners Night.

    stunning. Is the P40 going to get a repaint or are they nursing it through to the release of ‘Red Tails’

    Thank you – yes the nursing is over for the P-40 and she wil get a re-paint this year. Not sure when that film will ever get finished – we were on set nearly two years ago!

    in reply to: Duxfords second buchon #1120069
    Mark V
    Participant

    Nice artwork Roobs 🙂

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Spitfire #1120076
    Mark V
    Participant

    Here are a few from me (there are afew small details to finish including the cowl fastener dashes and the R under the nose):

    Roobs – sadly we did not have an original type screen to fit – would have liked to and would still like to (it also requires a canopy change as the front hoop is lower in profile on the wrap-around screen).

    The Beach – not sure what the BBMF Lanc has to do with it? :confused:

    The Big Picture – thank you – but this is how PL965 looked when she was in service with 2nd TAF in 1945, so that was the only choice of scheme for us. For some strange reason she has never been presented post resto like this until now.

    in reply to: Lavochkin LA-9 and LA-11 #1129342
    Mark V
    Participant

    The La-11 is owned and stored by TFC – I am not aware of any restoration work having been undertaken on it to date. One thing is for certain – it will be stunning when they get round to it, if the performance of the La-9 is anything to go by anway.

    in reply to: Horsemen to appear at Duxford 2011 #1134115
    Mark V
    Participant

    Why of all the choices it will be the trio of Mustangs?

    Because they can lay hands on three P-51’s here – a bit more diffcult with the other machines!

    in reply to: Flug Werk to sell the rights and tools to the FW-190 #1137381
    Mark V
    Participant

    Peter – a useful list but a bit out of date now – the Military Aviation Museum example has been flying since last year – the Jacquard machine has changed owners and is under re-build in Germany – the Blair D-9 has also changed owners to MAM.

    in reply to: BBMF PM631 #1144690
    Mark V
    Participant

    Very nice.

    On a similar note, I can’t wait to see PL965 in her authentic 16 Squadron scheme, too.

    Neither can I :p – needs about another week.

    PM631 – very nice job 🙂

    in reply to: FHC´s (Paul Allen´s) Fw 190 A 5 maiden flight #1145017
    Mark V
    Participant

    This is an interesting thread…. I have no personal experience of this aircraft myself but I have done the specialist painting on a repro FW-190 recently so I can understand the issues to some extent. I think its hard to reach a conclusion from the posted pics without knowing the aircraft at first hand (and only Bruce and a Boghopper’s ‘guest’ here can boast that). I admit I did give some thought as to how I would have tried to do it given the opportunity and concluded the paint shop had quite a task on their hands. From the photo captions it seems that they applied the factory scheme and then overpainted the ‘local’ forest colours, as would have been done orignally. That certainly seems like the correct way to go – although I had imagined the locally applied paint would have been ‘rough’ and ‘improvised’ considering the conditions under which it would have been applied and that would need to be carried through in to this modern re-paint. Perhaps applying the local paint in a way to allow the factory colours to still be visible. Of course there can be a temptation to try to reproduce a ‘weathered’ appearance – but then you are going down the movie paint route and its not something that is generally done these days outside of the film world. Of course, as Bruce pointed out, getting some flying done and some exhaust grime on her will improve things – I discovered this with The Fighter Factory ‘White 11’ we did last year – looked much better once it was dirty! The attached photo is a recent one taken in the hangar and shows her after a good few hours or flying and only light cleaning – the whole effect is much ‘mellower’ so the FHC machine will get similar treatment so long as they dont go mad with the cleaning fluid!

    So I think I would like to see some more pictures with a few hours of flying under her belt – until then….

    Regardless of the relative merits of the paint scheme its still a magnificent achievement by everyone connected with the project!

    in reply to: Douglas Bader's Childhood Home Under Restoration #1146078
    Mark V
    Participant

    This is interesting! Good to see they are trying to reuse as many of the Yorkshire slate roof tiles as they can

    Not sure where it says that Peter, the earlier slate tiles were replaced many years ago with concrete examples and “All of the tiles have come from other buildings…”

    in reply to: Flying A Services? #1149410
    Mark V
    Participant

    The inspection was made on behalf of a potential purchaser (he did not buy the aircraft in question -but it was eventually purchased by another party).

    in reply to: Flying A Services? #1149481
    Mark V
    Participant

    You will not get permission from Mr Arnold to visit – not that there is anything to see that is in any way recognisable.

    Bruce

    I visited the facility in 2004 in order to make a pre-purchase inspection of oneof Mr Arnolds aircraft that was available for sale at the time – we were allowed access to the container it was installed in – but that was it – no tour!

    in reply to: Spitfire T.8 G-AIDN MT818 #1152372
    Mark V
    Participant

    cynic!

    😀

    in reply to: Spitfire T.8 G-AIDN MT818 #1152607
    Mark V
    Participant

    Not sure you could call un-screwing the fairing and re-fitting the original canopy a ‘conversion’.

    in reply to: Well I Find It Emotive(2006 thread) #1153583
    Mark V
    Participant

    A couple taken by me – Goxhill 2002.

    in reply to: CAA Changes The Rules – Ex Military Aircraft #1153621
    Mark V
    Participant

    You are probably thinking of the consultation which took place in the Autumn

    Moggy

    The link in my first post gives details of the feedback receieved from that consultation process. It does acknowledge that it does not have a significant bearing on many fixed-wing types.

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 2,768 total)