Have her markings changed?
The old D-Day scheme (and the earlier pink scheme underneath it) was completely stripped off earlier this year and at the moment she is test flying in bare metal with the civil registration G-MKXI displayed. In a couple of weeks a new scheme will be applied to replicate her appearance in Spring 1945 with 16 Sqdn. 2nd TAF – although based on PRU Blue, this is somewhat different from any scheme she has worn since the original re-build in 1992 – so hopefully a welcome change.
About time too, bet the engine sounds sweet. Well done
😉 Very sweet indeed! Those Eye Tech Engineering chaps have done a fabulous job 🙂
Hmm, prices from £26 ish on abebooks.com, although there are some stupid prices noted.
Its obviously calmed down now – last time I looked they were £86 minimum 😮
‘Spitfires and Polished Metal’ should have a number of pics of it under restoration at Audley End.
Thats a very expensive book to obtain these days.
As MV293 was completed in August 1992 there would not be much to be seen of it in 1988 in terms of restoration work. As Bruce said, NH799 was done at Audely End and photos of TB863 (G-CDAN), in primer prior to first flight, are fairly common due to it being out on the line in the July 1988 Spitfire Anniversary Airshow. I have even got some myself!
Wonderful!! 🙂 Thanks for posting the link to an extraordinary sight!
“Fly on the wall scenario monday at 11 Group”
Good morning sir.
Morning SASO have a good day yesterday !
Fraid not sir broke the stumps at the OXO cricket ground.
Good lord have we got to pay for them.
No i think they have gone to AHB for safe keeping.
Thank God for that,By the way where’s 574 this morning.
She’s in the other hangar sir having some work done.
Jolly good i”m taking her over to Kenley for lunch.
She may not be ready until teatime sir.
Why are you looking pale SASO is there something i need to know!!!
That is hilarious! 😀
That I did not know. So, the fact that some “warbirds” are thrown around the sky for our extreme pleasure, and others are flown more carefully has nothing to do with “life” but more to do with the owner’s choice and pilot disgression, perhaps?
Correct!
Thank you everyone for the generous comments which are much appreciated – it was a team effort, as these projects always are, however the owner should also be congratulated for instigating the re-paint in the first instance.
We are all very pleased with the results 🙂
In the later, powered unit (ie. virtually all Spitfires & Seafires) there is of course only one operating jack per side,
I recall the early manual pump arrangement used the same hardware as the Walrus, thats the last time I saw one.
the pencil sketch IS priceless, but is it just me or does it not resemble something more like a Whitley/Stirling crossbreed?
Seems it is just you – its most definately a Stirling! 🙂
Nighthawk2’s caption to the photo of Battle of Britain B25 N6578D is not quite correct. The fabric cover over the nose was not to protect from the sun, it was to protect the plexiglass hemisphere from getting covered in bugs on take-off and climb out.
That seems to agree with post no. 2:
Purely from memory istr that the B25 nose covering was left on for take off and climb out to protect against insect splatter on the nose,then ripped off in flight !
What about the place in Jersey that did them?
They only sell parts these days.
Thank you all!!!
Glad to see that the Mk I will be faithfully rendered in that operating system, cheers Mark. I thought you might have problems getting it registered. I’m not totally sure how you would go here with that.
Ironically today in the UK going down the 100% authentic route is actually the ‘path of least resistance’ in terms of certification. So long as you can 100% confirm to the CAA this aircraft had a manual u/c pump system and the one you are installing in the restoration is the same, generally you will be fine.
PS: Tony I appreciate you were not criticising the project 🙂
Mark,
Thanks, I think it is that restoration that I have a picture of showing the unit. I suppose that is for show and the gear doesn’t actually have to be PUMPED on her.
I disagree – this is a top class restoration and I would be surprised if the gear did not have to be manually pumped up and down as per the original. How else would it be achieved without serious modification (and all the issues that go with that in the UK) and compromised originality?
Wildcat or Dauntless.
Anyone know?
Its a Wildcat.