dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bell UH-1H Moves To NW #2105720
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Thanks for the info folks.I’m CERTAIN the machine I saw was a UH-1H and not one of the re-engined Griffins or one of the turboshaft powered civvy derivatives.It sounded like a piston engine, the blades made the charecteristic Vietnam-style ‘whop-whop’ noise and they didn’t look like they could possibly be doing enough revolutions to keep the thing in the air.It was flying just offshore parallel to the beach at Selsey in W.Sussex in July.I thought it might’ve been a civvy owned one operating out of Shoreham or Goodwood.It was painted in overall Olive Drab,rather like the ones you see on Vietnam movies.Perhaps it was a visiting military one from some other country-do the Germans still operate Hueys?I’ve seen German CH-53’s flying over the same area before now.

    in reply to: Bell UH-1H Moves To NW #2105836
    Ant.H
    Participant

    When did this one last fly?I saw a Huey chug(?) past when I was sunning myself on a south coast beach in the summer.Same one perhaps?How many are active in the UK at the moment?

    in reply to: Real aeroplane company #2105843
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I’m not doubting the workmanship that’s gone into the Buchon,but I’m not sure those cardboard prop blades are up to the job 😉 😀

    in reply to: Concord conspiracy theory #2105859
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Just a note about the delta-winged Mirage fighters-they were derived from the Fairey FD.1 and FD.2,so thier roots ARE British I’m afraid!

    in reply to: Real aeroplane company #2106322
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Whooooohoooooooo!! 😀 That makes me one happy bunny!I hope this all pans out,it will be great to see the PR.XI back,and decked out in her proper colours,and we get the Buchon as an added bonus.That’s the best piece of news I’ve heard for a while,it’s made my evening.Here’s to 2004…:cool:
    Follow the link and click on ‘The Bugle’ for the full article…

    http://www.realaero.com/

    in reply to: Time For The Big Guns #2106325
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I’m in agreement with you Bucc,an all-red Vulcan with a giant white V on it would do me fine,although I know it wouldn’t be to everyone’s tastes!I don’t care what colour she flies in,so long as she flies.There was a time when I thought that making her fly again was a waste of resources and hangar space,but now it’s come so far it just HAS to keep going,I can’t bear to think of her getting the chop.It’s fly or bust!

    in reply to: What was the first Spitfire to crash in Scotland. #2106329
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The Aer*plane article gives the correct serial as AW177,and also confirmes that it was the same machine pictured in Snapper’s post.

    in reply to: What was the first Spitfire to crash in Scotland. #2106373
    Ant.H
    Participant

    “I hope it wasn’t BW881, as that aircraft is now under restoration as G-KAMM”
    Lol! Thanks for pointing that out Yak-11,that’ll teach me to rely on my grey matter at this time of night!I’ll dig out my copy of Aer*plane with the He111 database section in it and get the proper serial in a bit.

    in reply to: 609 Squadron 30/9/1940 Sqdn Codes #2106378
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I don’t know if it’s any help,but the Spitfire at Point Cook,Australia, is painted to represent R6915 and it wears the codes PR-U.I dunno how thorough thier research was on the colour scheme,but it might be worth following up.

    in reply to: What was the first Spitfire to crash in Scotland. #2106386
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I think Snapper’s Heinkel is the one which was repaired and flown again by the RAF for evaluation.I think the serial was BW881,but nothing is coming up on a Google search,so can’t be sure.She was destroyed in a fatal mid-air collision with a captured Ju88A during a demonstration flight over Duxford in 1943. 🙁

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 #2106451
    Ant.H
    Participant

    In short,not alot!She’s still in bits,as she has been for the last year or so.I believe the Lotto people are still considering an application for a grant to fund the completion of her restoration to airworthiness.If that fails,it could mean that she’ll be chopped up as the costs of putting her back together even to static standard are pretty astronimical (something like £200K has been suggested in various places).

    in reply to: Lots of familiar faces in here… #2106459
    Ant.H
    Participant

    As Mike J says,I was referring to the Duck as a decent P51,as opposed to the lash-up now at Cosford.
    Although my instincts are to agree with those who say it’s a shame that the Duck has been grounded,the more I use my head,the more sense it’s grounding makes.
    To add to the reasons I gave in the previous post,we have to remember that the UK-based flyers cannot keep flying forever-some may be lost in accidents or sold abroad etc.If you had to place a bet on which Mustang would still be extant in the UK in say 30 years’ time,which would be your safest bet?IMHO it would be the Duck by far.According to the article about Tullius in last month’s Flypast,his aim is to try and make sure that a P51 is preserved in the UK as a lasting tribute to all those who flew them from here in WW2,and I think the placing of the Duck in the RAFM is the best way of going about it.
    Ok,so it’s a shame she won’t fly,but there are numerous others still flying,many of which are not nearly as original as Tullius’ machine.

    in reply to: 65 Squadron at Great Sampford #2106624
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Hi Adrian,
    If you ask the guys at the RAFM nidely they could probably provide you with a copy.Might set you back a couple of quid,but from what others have told me they’re very good copies with plenty of info.Should be just the ticket.

    in reply to: Lots of familiar faces in here… #2106633
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Welcome aboard,Corsair! 🙂
    The last I heard,the Duck is to be placed on a slowly rotating turntable in Milestones of Flight.
    Whilst it’s a shame that something perfectly airworthy should be grounded,the decision does make sense in various ways.The aircraft is a very original one,with only cosmetic restoration having been done on it since it was built-the airframe only had 200 hours on it from new when Tullius bought it back in the early 80’s.As time goes by,more and more bits and pieces would need repairing and replacing,and eventually you’d get the Trigger’s Broom scenario.So,in retiring the aircraft now,an awful lot of original Inglewood workmanship is being preserved.It really is a 1945-built Mustang!
    It also makes very good sense for the RAFM,as even our most powerful national museums can’t afford the prices being asked for even the most hopeless looking P51 wrecks.I can’t see how the RAFM would’ve got thier hands on a decent P51 without a gesture like Tullius’.

    in reply to: Retractable Tailwheels #2106644
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Previous post edited-I sense that it is somehow a delicate issue for you Mark,so I’ll keep my guesses to myself and spare your blushes 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 2,663 total)