dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfires in service #1212542
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Wasn’t it something to do with the CO not belonging to either A or B Flights…? :confused:

    That rings a bell Daz, thanks. 🙂

    in reply to: Spitfires in service #1212713
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Hi Tony,

    The Spitfire is MJ730, a Mk.IX which genuinely served with 32 Sqn in the Italian campaign. Most, if not all RAF fighters in that theatre had red or black spinners as a recognition feature. I believe obvious unit markings, such as the chequerboard markings on the fin, were forbidden in wartime. Many RAF squadrons before the war had adopted thier own colours, hence the colourful Hawker Furies, Bristol Bulldogs etc of the pre-war period. The marking on 32 sqn’s aircraft was the black/white chequer pattern, and these colours re-appeared after the war.

    The aircraft marked with a question mark was known as the “CO’s Queery”, and there were atleast two squadrons in the Med/ N Africa theatre who had aircraft bearing a question mark. Frustratingly, I can’t remember why it was done though!

    in reply to: Spitfires in service #1212855
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Ant,

    32 Squadron were I believe in Green/Grey. It seems that after the demise of TZ210, it donated its top cowling to a 208 Squadron machine whose aircraft we know were Brown/Green.

    In my photo you can see that camou matches but the the side cowlings were from different Spitfires duly stencilled on the inside TP385 &TP278.

    How this externally matching set of cowlings ended up loose, but together, in the UK is a mystery…for which I am thankful.:)

    Mark

    Thanks for the explanation Mark, it sounds as though a 208 Sqn scheme would make an interesting choice when a Mk.XVIII next comes up for re-spray. 🙂 Were 208 the only squadron to use the green/brown scheme?

    Ant.H
    Participant

    Many thanks for all the gen, although I’m now wondering if in fact the aircraft used was a Gladiator rather than a Fury. 85sqn were formed with Glads in June ’38, converting onto the Hurri that November.

    Does anyone know if the film’s available on DVD? I could buy the VHS listed above on Amazon but I wouldn’t have anything to play it on!

    in reply to: Spitfires in service #1213357
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Here is a shot from 1973 still in the post war brown and green of Middle East Theatre Livery

    Mark

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/Mark12/Album%204/46-Cowlings-01-001-1.jpg

    SM845 looks lovely as she is, but does this mean that technically she should be in a green/brown scheme?

    in reply to: RAFM Cosford, 31st August #1218911
    Ant.H
    Participant

    NCWM

    Vulcan
    Victor
    Belfast
    Jetstream

    have I forgotten any?

    You might also include the Argosy and the Comet 1, which are now housed in the hangar space previously occupied by some of the airframes now in NCWM.

    in reply to: Harrier XV806 #1219161
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Being extremely pedantic here, but the Fairey aircraft should be written in roman numerals, ie. TSR.I and TSR.II. Pedantic, but it can save confusion sometimes.

    in reply to: Lufthansa Connie #1219171
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The MATS Connie did display at Legends ’98, but it never landed there. I think the one Alan l means is the Breitling-sponsored Super Connie from Switzerland, which did operate out of Duxford for the show in 2006.

    in reply to: Who would jump from an aircraft like this? #1225786
    Ant.H
    Participant

    “After you.”
    “No, after you”
    “No, no, after you I insist”…

    in reply to: surviving lancasters #1225797
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Crikey…..forgot about that….what ever happened to it???

    It’s now on static display at the Brussels Air Museum.

    http://picasaweb.google.com/bamf.bamrs/FaireyBattleR3950/photo#5065885862141999026

    in reply to: Tempest II restoration, any updates? #1227795
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Yep, I did mean Hendon’s Typhoon. It’s pretty convincingly done, but then it becomes obvious when you look hard enough. A big give-away are the pretend exhaust stubs which are actually attached to the cowlings themselves.

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2526391474_2e23854767.jpg?v=0

    The engine from this example was removed in the US shortly after it ceased flying, and it’s never been complete since as far as I’m aware.

    in reply to: Who would jump from an aircraft like this? #1228360
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Avro Shackleton? I’m basing this guess on the door shape and aeronut’s comments about parts related to the Argosy- IIRC the first Argosy’s were built with wings derived from those on the Shackleton.

    in reply to: Tempest II restoration, any updates? #1229011
    Ant.H
    Participant

    There is also a complete Sabre in what looks to be excellent condition in the Science Museum in London. It’s on the engine racks in the aviation gallery- take a torch and you might just see it! 🙁

    Regards Hendon’s Typhoon, I dont think there’s anything ‘real’ forward of the firewall. The cowlings, rad housing, spinner etc are all look-alikes, not the genuine bits. I believe the prop is off an Avro Shackleton.

    in reply to: Who would jump from an aircraft like this? #1229565
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Tailboom of a Blackburn Beverley?

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurricane Progress #1229633
    Ant.H
    Participant

    More progress! The tail unit is on, and the wings are being fitted out. Mouth watering stuff, can’t wait to see her fly.

    http://www.hangar11.co.uk/gallery.php?id=8

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 2,663 total)