The second New Zealander was F/O Leonard Chambers, the Wireless Operator in Mick Martin’s crew on ‘P-Pospsie’. There’s a list of all the crews involved in the raid on the Dambusers.org site JDK mentioned above. Clicking a name gives the crewman’s details.
http://www.dambusters.org.uk/crews.htm
According to the site, Chambers passed away in 1982
The Nationalities of those involved, taken from Appendix E of Sweetman’s Dambusters book…
RAF/RAF(VR):90 took part, 38 Killed, 1 POW
RCAF:29 took part, 13 killed, 1 POW
RNZAF:2 took part,0 killed, 0 POW
RAAF:12 took part, 2 killed, 1 POW
Total: 133 took part, 53 killed, 3 POW
Daz, make a contribution to the forum swear-jar, St*rfix is a word never to be uttered in decent company 😀
I can’t decide on one particular best or worst and some of my choices have already been mentioned so I’ll just list a few that haven’t been already.
Best:
1:72 Spitfire Mk.1-the famous “AZ-H”-who here HASN’T built one? Still perhaps the most accurate looking 1:72 Spit on the market and an easy build.
1:72 B26 Marauder-easy to build, accurate and very decent interior detail for it’s age, complete with open bomb doors and a detailed bomb bay. Mine’s an old one that came with a stand- any chance they could start doing those again??
1:72 Fw190D-Perhaps overtaken by the latest ‘Tamigawa’s, but a simple kit that always turned out nicely and still looks good today.
1:72 Bf109K-Again like the Dora Nine, perhaps overtaken but still a good build and a nice model.
Worst
1:72 P51D- Bad overall shape and the two fuselage halves were a different size!Ergh!
1:72 Hawker Typhoon-Oversized prop and spinner moulded as one and always warped, the cockpit canopy was a blob of clear plastic.
1:72 Folland Gnat-I never built this one as a kid so I don’t have the fond memories of it that others here seem to have. Perhaps it’s the age of the moulds but mine was warped all over the place and the wing joints were extremely poor.
Most built:
1:72 Spitfires, both Mk.1 and Mk.V. I think I built three Mk.V’s in one go when I was a kid!
I sincerely hope Airfix will make a comeback, and I hope they’ll do the decent thing and bin the blatantly cr*p kits that give them such a bad name. They could also do with finding someone else to print thier decals for them, all Airfix kits I’ve bought in the last ten years have had absolutely awful decals, always printed off-centre and sometimes very brittle. Even some of the cr*pper kit makers (eg SMER) manage to supply very decent decals.
Ahhhhh just seen my mistake, thanks David 🙂 It’s been a while since you went to a game then Atcham? 😀
Perhaps football isn’t so bad after all. During the last match I attended (Tranmere Rovers, dragged there by a friend) a B-47 flew over on a long
contrail. Definitely the highlight of the afternoon.
A B47? That would be something, although I’m sure there are none left flying. I’m wondering if you mean the WB57F (Martin-built Canberra thingy) that’s been in and out of Mildenhall just lately.
http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/scene/mhall/060823/wb57.htm
Coming back onto the main topic, I must admit I’d given the project up for dead just a few days ago. Congratulations to all involved and it’s very very good to know all those jobs have been saved. I only saw the Vulcan a couple of times but it was enough to leave a deep impression, it would be wonderful to see her flying again.
It’s the fuselage of HS Trident 3B G-AWZJ,which they’ve had for a few years now. The museum also recently acquired the cockpit section of Trident 1C G-ARPP which was scrapped at Glasgow Abbotsinch a couple of years ago.
Just found the museum’s website…
http://www.dumfriesaviationmuseum.com/
Are you sure?
I thought that the trials footage was of the Highball trials in Loch Leven (?), and Highball was spherical…
Adrian
Perhaps they do use a bit of Highball footage,but as I remember it all the footage of test drops that’s used in the film has a bomb that’s extensively retouched. There’s one sequence (I think it’s a Wellington test drop) where the spherical blob appears to have lumpy bits on it, presumably the edges of the cylindrical Upkeep occasionally poking out from behind the superimposed blob as it bounces unevenly.(I hope that makes sense!)
There was some footage in the original film of some of the actual test drops, but they retouched the footage to obscure the true shape of the bomb and make it look like a non-descript sphere.
Although the original film is ‘untouchable’ in many ways, there has been alot of research and de-classification carried out since both the Brickhill book was written and the first film was made. I hope the makers of the new film will make use of some of the more recent works by people like John Sweetman- if they only use Brickhill then there are bound to be inaccuracies in the finished film.
There was one at the North East Aircraft Museum but got burned out by vandals. I think putting several hundred volts through the fence would be a good deterent.
Ali
Whilst I agree in principle 😀 the problem for NEAM at the time was that they didn’t have much in the way of fencing to put volts through. The underside of the Vulcan had quite a few dings and dents knocked in it and the bomb aimer’s window smashed by the same lovely folk. Thankfully the fencing situation was sorted a few years back and they’ve had no more problems as far as I’m aware.
Peter Teichman has just come roaring over Hatfield in the P40, gun ports singing. Simply gorgeous 😀
Cover of Pink Floyd’s 1987 album Momentary Lapse of Reason (which includes the track ‘Learning to Fly’). Spot the microlight!
I guess it depends what’s meant by best, whether it was best in the circumstances or best on paper. It has to be remembered that the Japanese had problems getting hold of the correct materials and skilled labour to build some of the more advanced designs of aircraft and engines, and so those that were best on paper weren’t always best in reality.
On paper it would probably be something like the Mitsubishi A7M Reppu or the Nakajima Ki84 Hayate, but considering Japan’s situation the best was probably the Ki100. It mated a relatively simple airframe with a tried, tested and mass-produced engine, and at the same time had excellent handling and armament and a performance that was good enough to enable it to contend with the late war allied fighters. In short, it was both a great fighter and a design that the industry could actually build in numbers.
That’s my tuppence-worth anyway…
Spooky 😀
One of the best aviation autobiographies I’ve ever read is ‘Carrier Pilot’ by Norman Hanson. He was an RN Fleet Air Arm pilot flying Corsairs with 1833sqn based on HMS Illustrious, and his book covers his eventful and compelling career from recruitment to de-mob. Possibly the best auto-biog written by a WWII FAA veteran.
Sadly, it doesn’t seem to have been reprinted recently and what copies there are available seem to be fetching respectable prices, anything up to £30 for a decent copy. Got mine a few years ago for 50p 🙂