dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Warbirds and women #1346185
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Ah,Elly Protheroe was the woman I was thinking of flying the B25.I was under the impression she flew the DOB AF’s B25 rather than Grumpy,but my grey matter isn’t as reliable as it used to be!

    in reply to: Happy Birthday Skybolt #1347551
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Happy Birthday mate,many happy landings!

    in reply to: Warbirds and women #1348512
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I can’t remember her name,but I’m certain there was a female Chief Pilot on the Duke of Brabant B25 in the mid-90’s.

    in reply to: Happy B-day Turbo NZ #1351640
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Seconded,have a good one mate 🙂

    in reply to: Happy Birthday Stringbag! #1353442
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Many happy returns mate 🙂

    in reply to: RNHF WG655 – Apr 85 #1358947
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Fantastic pics mate,thanks for sharing,looks like you had a great day. WG655 was one awesome looking brute,is it just me or does anyone else think the two-seaters are somehow better looking than the singles?
    Does anyone have any recent news or piccies of ‘655 under rebuild at Kenosha?

    in reply to: Spitfire XIV query #1360193
    Ant.H
    Participant

    BBMF’s PM631 was painted up in the markings of a D-Day Mk.XIV in the 1980’s. Go down to the Mk.XIX section on this page and you’ll find a piccy of her.

    http://www.spitfiresociety.demon.co.uk/whatmark.htm

    Hope this helps 🙂

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1365474
    Ant.H
    Participant

    IIRC,four Buccs were sprayed in a wraparound sand/stone for the Red Flag exercises. The respray on one example wasn’t quite completed before it departed to the US and spent the tour flying in a peculiar half desert,half european camo scheme! There was an excellent article about RAF Buccs in ‘Scale Aircraft Modelling’ about a year or so ago, and it included colour profiles of a couple of these Red Flag examples. I’ve recently moved so unfortunately my copy is in ‘deep storage’ for a while,perhaps someone else has a copy??

    in reply to: Grumpy #1368899
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Speaking of which,has a date been set for when Grumpy’s due to cross ‘the pond’? She had her US civil reggie slapped on at the time of Legends last year and it seemed her export was imminent then,but I’ve not heard anything since.

    in reply to: AW Siskin parts #1375548
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Thanks for your replies guys,some very interesting leads to follow up. As for the idea of building multiple examples,it’s a possibility but more research needs to be done to see if even one can be built. The Siskin was the RAF’s first fighter with an all-metal structure (the contemporary Gamecock was the last with a primarily wooden structure) and replication of a metal airframe is more complex than doing the same in wood.

    in reply to: FR.5 WK277 Swift at Newark Air Museum #1377678
    Ant.H
    Participant

    As far as I’m aware she’s not a composite airframe and I’d be surprised if she’s been downgraded in BAPC’s listings-‘277 is one of only 4 Swifts in existance. The airframe is owned by a private individual rather than the museum,so perhaps there is some sort of ownership issue,it’s the only reason I can think of.
    Which mag did you read the story in BC?

    in reply to: Big-up for the Shuttleworth #1377784
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Excellent news about the M.1,thanks Robbo. For me she’s arguably the best looking of the WW1 types at OW and I’ve never seen her fly,she’s very much something to look forward to for this year. 🙂

    in reply to: Spitfire 161 (again), today at Bourn #1380850
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Lovely pics Hash,that third shot in particular. I don’t mean to be an unappreciative rivet-counting g*t,but should she have a red spinner? IIRC,the spinners on Irish Spits were the same green as the rest of the airframe.Have they borrowed the spinner off TD248 for the flight tests?

    in reply to: AW Siskin parts #1381955
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Thanks for the info guys,all much appreciated. It gives me some leads to work with atleast,I’ll follow them up and see where they go. Sorry I can’t say more…
    MRP,I’d be very grateful if you could pass on the info on or from your Canadian contacts.Feel free to PM or email me.

    in reply to: Strange B-17 with only 2 engines. Very old thread #1383480
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Flying with one engine nacelle removed has been done before. One of the first Lockheed Constellations supplied to TWA had an ‘argument’ with a truck at New York airport which caused damage to the No.1 engine nacelle. It was decided to remove the nacelle and fair it over,and the aircraft was then flown in this peculiar 3-engine configuration all the way across the US back to Burbank,California for the repairs!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 2,663 total)