The current Mrs BSG-75 throwing flack via text and mail…

“I want to speak to the children every day”

ah, well poppet, you left them remember…..

“did you give them vitamin pills”?

“did you phone so and so’s mum” – “ah no, you never gave me her number” – “yes I did it was the one that you said didn’t work”….

and so on and so forth….

My little girl (she is 6 1/2) watching out of the living room window to see if the conkers we planted were growing yet (conkers we planted 20 mins before….:rolleyes:) why waste money on a TV when she is happy watching/waiting for seeds to grow ?

As for Ms Price, I’ve posted before that I laughed out loud when I heard somebody on Radio 5 call her a “ballon breasted she chav”… how/why is she famous….. ? does my head in, thing is, the fine for the number plates will be paid by loose change she finds tucked between the lumps of silicone…:mad:

Condolences to all of his friends and family, I passed details of the Whirlwind build to the model forum I use to help a guy here scratch build a Whirly, he was astonished at what Ray was looking to do.

farewell, and I wish you blue peaceful skies for all time.

I looked here as well Hesham ! 😉

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,11125.0.html

I don’t use that forum nearly as much but there is some fun stuff there.

The second most telling point for me, was the diary of the German Bf-109 pilot, I never thought that the Luftwaffe would be on a defensive posture at all, with pilots strapped in the cockpits to protect the airfields from RAF attack. I always thought (or assumed) that the bombers and their crews were kept back for invasion duties. I know the role of Bomber Command has been discussed on recent threads as well and is perhaps “over looked”, but I was suprised by those diary entries.

I am guessing (or assuming again :confused:) that the damage inflicted was light (especially given the comment about how many bombs were needed to put an airfield out of action when the presenter talked about Kenley etc) but if you are loading up bomber aircraft with a genuine fear of air attack, it surely must have started to wear down the crews (air and ground) involved.

We had a “frequent” flyer report an issue today claiming (again) extensive hardware failure on the kit they have owned and reported numerous issues on. One of the guys called the end user a “technocondriac”, somebody who says there is always something wrong with their equipment.:diablo::D

firstly, dreadful website that newspaper has ! As for the proposals, they are a bit of a bu99ers muddle as my old dad would have said.

number six has its merits, and the one with what looked like a MK 24 (can’t look at the images again) on a spiral was OK.

The aircraft should surely be a MK1 (however stylised and enlarged) or even K5054?