dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,831 through 1,845 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2348242
    mack8
    Participant

    How many Mig-29K/KUB are suposed to be purchased? Thanks.

    in reply to: Aero India 2011 #2348414
    mack8
    Participant

    AMCA looks like a baby PAK-FA! Is it known if Sukhoi or other russian aircraft design bureaus are involved in designing the AMCA ?

    In my honest opinion , going in the realm of speculation, but if the russians get into some sort of deal with the indians regarding AMCA , a sort of reversed FGFA joint venture , it would be a great idea.

    A russianized AMCA , with russian engines ( i’m sure they can easily come up with upgraded 10tf class RD-33 derivatives, such projects were /are in the work for years , isn’t it ?) and avionics, and maby custom russian design features would be a wonderful suplement for PAK-FA, and i would think at a fraction of the cost of developing a LMFS from scratch.

    Anyway just a random thought.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2348894
    mack8
    Participant

    (Lovely) Hi rez pic of the Mig-29UPG here …

    http://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?p=473646

    Looks like it has some sort of ECM( or other electronic equipment) fairing on the bottom right fin …
    …and what appers to be some fairings under the wing tips, very interesting .

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2349038
    mack8
    Participant

    Regarding this S-duct thing …i would dare say re: the afirmation that T-50 is the only 5th gen fighter which doesn’t have one, does F-35 really has an “S- duct”? It seems to me that it’s “S-duct” is more like dictated by it’s configuration ie single engine combat aircraft with side intakes, rather than being a specifically chosen design solution.

    Offcourse, aicraft like F-22 and possibly J-20 and aparently S-37 and Mig 1.44 does have these famous “S-ducts” , specifically chosen for the purpose of hiding(?) the compressor face in (usually) multiengine aircraft, and chosen OVER the more straightfoward air intake design which would have the engine compressor exposed/ partially exposed. At least that how i see an S-duct.

    IMO T-50 and F-35 are in a different class anyway , so i don’t know why peoples keep comparing them.:rolleyes:. Think F-15/F-16 and F-22/F-35. The russian equivalents for the fourth gen are Su-27/Mig-29. Again IMO, F-35 is for T-50 what F-16 is for Su-27.

    Some people here say that the Sukhoi folks would indeed use some form of screening for the engine compressors, so we have to wait and see what they came up with.

    Anyway just my 2 pence.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2349714
    mack8
    Participant

    I was refering to this bit

    На общем российском стенде, формируемом ГК «Ростехнологии», в рамках корпоративной экспозиции Объединенной авиастроительной корпорации (ОАК) будет продемонстрирован проект разрабатываемого совместно с Индией перспективного многофункционального истребителя пятого поколения, боевые самолеты Су30МКИ, МиГ-35, МиГ-29К.

    Roughly translated as

    At the general Russian stand formed Rostechnologii, within the corporate exposure of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) will be demonstrated the project developed jointly with India prospective multifunctional fifth generation fighter, combat aircraft Su30MKI, MiG-35 MiG-29K.

    I would assume that IF they’re talking about PMI/PMF/FGFA ( as in the indian version of the T-50), MABY they’re going to show a model of it. Let’s hope someone is gonna keep an eye on the Rostechnologii stand .:p

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2349775
    mack8
    Participant

    PMI (PMF/FGFA?) to be unveiled at Aero India?
    http://sukhoi.org/news/company/?id=3893

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2350022
    mack8
    Participant

    This news article here regarding PAK-FA…
    http://www.rian.ru/defense_safety/20110207/331270150.html

    …should it be understood that the second prototype is at the ground tests stage at this moment? ( i tried some translators , but lest say they can be better …)

    Thanks .:)

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2350581
    mack8
    Participant

    I don’t think any pictures have been released (of the Mig-29UPG), i looked in all the places i could think yesterday and couldn’t find anything.:confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #299937
    mack8
    Participant

    Hi Lincoln 7,

    Thank you for your help. Well i aleardy ordered the issue in question a few days ago from the local bookshop ( where i usually make my book orders ) so i guess it’s too late to cancel. Food for thought for next time though.

    Personally, i would think electronic versions of AI or other reputable aviation magazines, would be a great idea. Few clicks, get your card details in, then click ok ; next, you happily read it on your PC in minutes! Everything is on the computer these days , isn’t it ?:p

    in reply to: Air International Febr.2011 #1891287
    mack8
    Participant

    Hi Lincoln 7,

    Thank you for your help. Well i aleardy ordered the issue in question a few days ago from the local bookshop ( where i usually make my book orders ) so i guess it’s too late to cancel. Food for thought for next time though.

    Personally, i would think electronic versions of AI or other reputable aviation magazines, would be a great idea. Few clicks, get your card details in, then click ok ; next, you happily read it on your PC in minutes! Everything is on the computer these days , isn’t it ?:p

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2351277
    mack8
    Participant

    Second half of February 😉

    Groomi ?:eek:

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2351574
    mack8
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News From Around The World – VII #2353513
    mack8
    Participant

    I dont think that’s the Feb 2011 issue, it’s October 2010. 😉

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2354149
    mack8
    Participant

    The management of the F-35 project might leave a lot to be desired but you can’t say it’s any worse other fighter projects can you? what yardstick, standard for comparison are you using? Rafale first flew in 1986, but! didn’t enter service until 2004 or so – how’s that for “project management”…:rolleyes:

    Wasn’t Rafale A a TD , just like say EAP , Mig 1.44 or X-35? I think Rafale C first flew in 1991 if i’m correct.

    in reply to: Someone Besides Hot Dogs's F-35 Cyber News Thread #5 #2354218
    mack8
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 1,831 through 1,845 (of 2,087 total)