dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2232177
    mack8
    Participant

    Again, like Havaarla pointed above, the HUD, the MFDs and the IAC-1 (and other items) are NOT russian! (last 2 are indian right?)! So what are they on about? I’m guessing they have asked the russians to help them with those items, but of course the sensationalist media in this or that pocket just distorts the facts and cry far and wide about being the russians’ fault.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2237178
    mack8
    Participant

    Whoaaaa… :love-struck:

    Courtesy Berkut.

    http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/9060/142138835.18/0_d598d_d44fb71c_orig

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2237181
    mack8
    Participant

    Courtesy grey boy 2 @ CD:

    http://i.imgur.com/lkmPzDZ.jpg

    in reply to: future of ukrainian air force? #2237784
    mack8
    Participant

    As or Syria – profit for the USA? That’s crazy. There’s been no profit. The USA hasn’t been pumping weapons in to the Al Qaeda lot. Indeed, it’s been reluctant to give arms to the secular anti-Assad forces for fear of them getting to the Islamist nutjobs, though recently it seems to have opened the taps, to allow the FSA to fight the Islamist extremists. Get that? Not arming the al-Qaeda lot, trying to get arms to those fighting the al-Qaeda lot

    Crazy? Lets’ see: Iraq? huge resources, oil, strategic position. Afganistan? Huge resources, gas, minerals, strategic position. Syria, HUGE RESOURCES. GAS. Strategic gas pipe (russian) going or planned to go through it; destroying a russian (and iranian- the ultimate prize) ally; guaranteeing the israeli occupation of Golan (good ol’ AIPAC at work); fermenting unrest in neighbouring countries (jihadists pouring into Iraq, which assures Iraq being even more dependent on US). And this just the top of the iceberg. No profit? Oh there is profit, and a few hundreds of thousands or a few MILLIONS if need be of syrian “towelheads” lives will not stand between the US and it!

    Same story with Ukraine. To have their puppet state at Russia’s border, you think breaking Ukraine or fermenting a war (civil or otherwise) and having tens or HUNDREDS of thousand of ukrainians killed will make them even blink?! This is all about, they don’t give a *** what the ukrainians want or need or deserve.

    BTW, the rebels seem to have mostly Russian & Chinese weapons, perhaps bought on the open market. So who’s profiting?

    You really think that’s an argument? They long stopped being that stupid, you won’t see them handing Stingers and M16s and US Army gear like yesteryear, they run it and do it from behind the scenes through their puppets like saudis and GCC states etc. Those weapons come from the black market and “allies” like Romania, even Croatia i heard and other places one can’t even think of they would come from. Plausible deniability.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2237980
    mack8
    Participant

    Thanks to by78 @ SDF:

    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7416/12914405984_364af27179_o.jpg

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2239095
    mack8
    Participant

    – tire fairings for the main landing gear are larger (but it may just be that the re-designed LERX which intersects it is less voluminous than it used to be)

    It also appears they are non-simetric now, the left one is longer than the right one- perhaps that’s where the gun is?

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2239568
    mack8
    Participant

    Please scroll down here (note the model has been painted black afterwards- see subsequent pages).
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?119400-Shenyang-J-21-31-F-60-AMF-thread-part-1/page8

    in reply to: A "Rough" F-35 Kinematics Analysis #2239612
    mack8
    Participant

    Thank you for the hard work Andraxxus, a very interesting read (although the mathematical part is way beyond me of course).

    Would you some day be willing/have the time do something like that but vs. the likes of J-20, T-50, J-31 etc.? Or even F-22 vs. those? 🙂
    PS: Oh yes, Rii is perfectly right, so how about vs. Rafale or Typhoon or even Gripen? That would be extremely interesting!

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2239626
    mack8
    Participant

    Congratulation to CAC and China for another huge milestone. Year looks good so far, series production J-10B soon reaching units, series pattern J-16 flown (likely it has an AESA, or at least an advanced PESA), now J-20 2011 flies, and not only that, but rumour is the second prototype of J-31 (with modifications akin to the AMF model) should fly soon too!

    Thanks no_name @ SDF

    http://oi62.tinypic.com/a0uy5d.jpg

    in reply to: future of ukrainian air force? #2239630
    mack8
    Participant

    Airbus & BAe don’t control EU industrial policy.

    Yes (unfortunately, on most counts*). It’s just no like we do things here, it’s not the MIC who controls the governments. If that would be the case, or even half the case, then we would have long showed the finger to the yanks, and there would have been many hundreds more (if not thousands) of eurocanards on order (cumulated), plus probably something like the Replica already (FLYING!), not to mention that whatever US equipment present in EU militaries right now would have likely been european. As it is the local defence industries have to fights AGAINST the politicians to just barely survive… and current trends are sadening.

    As for Ukraine, if the US backed puppets remain in charge and they get into this NATO and so on, they will go Romania way. Whatever defence industry capacities they have right now (Antonovs, AAMs, armoured vehicles, munitions, extensive overhauls etc.) they will be gone, destroyed in a decade, and then they will compete with their southern neighbours to be at the bottom of Europe…

    * we all see what is like to have a country run by the ruthless, profit driven MIC.; like that, never, not in Europe, but enough to keep the money and the jobs and the expertise HERE.

    in reply to: Poland wants 5th gen fighters.. who will win? #2239665
    mack8
    Participant

    Some time ago (couple of years) i’ve read that Poland was FORCED to buy F-16 through backstage games (same old IMF card among other veiled threats, blackmailing etc. if i’m not mistaken). They really wanted Gripen. I guess that 48 Gripens for them would likely have been not only cheaper to buy, and certainly cheaper to operate, but also the typically swedish offsets would have far exceeded what the yanks pretended to offer them … (and probably they would have had money left to do some interesting things with their MiG-29s, who knows)

    Gripen-NG after 2020 to replace Su-22 and later MiG-29 would have fitted like a glove.

    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2240299
    mack8
    Participant

    Contract with Rosvertol worth $2.7 billion for 6 Mi-26T2 (already being built), 42 Mi-28NE (or based on algerian forum info, a customized version based on the UB), and modernization of 39 Mi-171Sh:
    http://arms-tass.su/?page=article&aid=126015&cid=25

    Looking forward to the implementation of the rest of the planned aquisitions above (the subs have already been contracted or shortly will be btw- 2 of them), especially the Su-34s and the S-400s ! :p

    in reply to: BAE Replica movie #2243619
    mack8
    Participant

    UK/France/Europe’s own 5 or 5+ gen fighter? One can dream … REPLICA-based multirole fighters operating in conjunction with the UK-France joint UCAV now in development, how game-changing that would be (tactically, and for the european defence sectors).

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2243922
    mack8
    Participant

    Sorry, don’t have time to find an english source: http://www.interfax.ru/russia/txt/357940

    Thanks Berkut, so “only” six years to the first flight. Would be nice to see some “official” CGI meanwhile (like for PAK-FA).

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2244436
    mack8
    Participant

    What news about PAK-DA Berkut? Strangely, can’t find anything recent in the usual places (unless i’m looking in the wrong places altogether!)

    Anyway, so that this is not an empty post: according to this article, syrian contract MiG-29M/M2 airframes’ fate to be decided soon, options are either to be used to fulfill possible export contracts (like for Serbia) or to be used for building the SMTs for VVS- this though sounds very strange as it’s simply not possible-most of the M/M2s are finished and ready to fly, if they haven’t already- either they mean to have them ordered for VVS instead of the SMTs, or ordered alongside them. Syria is still slated to receive 12 MiG-29M/M2 in 2016-2017 now (obviously, it is hoped the situation will have stabilized by then). Speaking of the SMTs, the contract for 16 is said to be planned to be signed by the end of March.
    http://www.armstrade.org/includes/periodics/news/2014/0217/102522665/detail.shtml

    And also: MiG to almost double aircraft production by 2017, from 16 airframes yearly to 30.
    http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/10/production/

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 2,087 total)