dark light

mack8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 2,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • mack8
    Participant

    Yes the MF has the RWR antennas on the side , but i had the feeling the ( older SPO-2 or 3) RWR on the earlier MiG-21s will be in that small bullet shape dielectric fairing at the top of the fin ( above rudder) . :confused:

    http://data3.primeportal.net/hangar/bill_spidle2/mig-21pf-2/images/mig-21pf_49_of_53.jpg

    Any MiG-21 gurus can help with this little detail?

    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2293324
    mack8
    Participant
    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2293335
    mack8
    Participant

    Aparently, an algerian MiG-29 has been photographed in 558 ARZ under overhaul or modernization not long ago. I’ll have to find that picture again if it’s not already posted in this topic.

    mack8
    Participant

    Correct me if i’m wrong , but i’m pretty sure i’ve read somewhere that even MiG-17s had a basic RWR , on the fixed part of the rudder between the mid-placed elevators.

    Regarding the yom kippur war, pretty sure the MiG-21s, Su-7s and Su-20s all had Sirena series RWRs. Would be very interesting to see some suport for saying that the likes of MiG-21PF did not have a basic RWR.

    Chaff&flares dispensers as we know them today were practically not even invented yet in the 1967 and ’73 wars, and just about to enter wide scale use in the 1982 war.

    Chaff on it’s own though (as in strips of aluminium cut to jam different wavelenghts ) were of course in use in one form or the other from WW2. In the Vietnam war Phantoms ( and possibly others too) were carrying chaff pods, in a similar concept to that used in WW2 i.e. flying in front of the main strike , releasing their load to blind the oponent’s radars etc.

    There’s refering in some books i have that the israelis received chaff packages among other things during the yom kippur war from the americans, so probably they must have used chaff to at least some extent.

    My 2 cents anyway.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 7 #2296468
    mack8
    Participant

    Pics from last few days 😎 ( first one is 2001 , the rest are all of 2002)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2296509
    mack8
    Participant
    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2296513
    mack8
    Participant

    52, june 15.:cool:

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to80000/079620.jpg

    in reply to: BF-109 in wind tunnel 1934 for trials #993250
    mack8
    Participant

    That’s definitely NOT 1934. That’s an E subtype ( seems to have cannons in the wings too), which wasn’t serie produced until the end of 1938, while the canon variant started being produced in 1939.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2296636
    mack8
    Participant

    Oh right, haven’t checked the comments on those pics . Guess you can see what you wanna see sometimes.:p

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2296645
    mack8
    Participant

    Berkut, you’re a star.:D

    Now looking at the other 3 pictures , i can’t really make the bort , my eyes are either telling me “053” or even something ending in “1” on another pic. Could it have been PS-ed out before posting ( just like the first grey Su-34s)?

    in reply to: Russian arms sales to Syria #1792510
    mack8
    Participant

    Thoughts? Well i hope they’re gonna shoot down an F-22 with them (SAMs), just for the hell of it.:) Unfortunately , i’m pretty sure a war in that part of the world is inevitable, UN sanctioned or not, justified or not. ( not trying to stir things or anything, just saying my say)

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2297344
    mack8
    Participant

    Mr. Djcross’s distasteful comments would be much more welcomed on places like mp.net or f16.net, perhaps he should just go there. 😡

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2297511
    mack8
    Participant

    Don’t know if completely accurate , but i’m sure i just read somewhere that at the moment they are not based in Britain , instead the ETPS pilots go to Sweden to fly them.:confused:

    in reply to: Current Russian AF Bases #2298848
    mack8
    Participant

    I’ll just say that imho, i would give more credibility to what russian sources say about the RuAF organization and aircraft numbers, rather than western ones.
    Not that the western articles reffered to here are not useful , it’s just the russian folks should know even better what’s what. Just my 2 cents.:)

    тактическая авиация имеет 74 эскадрильи(37 истребительных(7 на МиГ-29, 1 на МиГ-29С, 2 на МиГ-29СМТ, 12 на МиГ-31, 11 на Су-27, 4 на Су-27СМ)

    Фронтовая(тактическая)авиация:
    МиГ-25 – 6(в т.ч. 4 МиГ-25РБ, 2 МиГ-25РУ)
    МиГ-29 – 255(в т.ч. 153 МиГ-29(9-13), 14 МиГ-29С, 30 МиГ-29СМТ, 52 МиГ-29УБ, 6 МиГ-29УБТ)
    МиГ-31 – 158(в т.ч. 156 МиГ-31(Б,БС), 2 МиГ-31БМ)
    Су-24 – 323(в т.ч. 24 Су-24, 160 Су-24М, 28 Су-24М2, 110 Су-24МР, 1 Су-24МП)
    Су-25 – 224(160 Су-25, 29 Су-25СМ, 1 Су-25Т, 33 Су-25УБ, 1 Су-25УБМ)
    Су-27 – 271(в т.ч. 159 Су-27(П,С), 55 Су-27СМ, 57 Су-27УБ)
    Су-34 – 5

    TR1, you wouldn’t happen to have similar numbers for bombers , trainers , transports and helicopters ?:eek: Thanks.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2299616
    mack8
    Participant

    Interesting, what the Junior DM’s report to parliament alludes to is that Sukhoi’s PAK-FA programme is running 2 years behind schedule- realistic RuAF IOC has slipped to 2018/19. Remember, the initial FGFA deliveries will be single seaters near-identical to their Russian counterparts (ACM Browne has already confirmed 166 single seaters and 48 2 seaters) also the IAF’s single seaters will be manufactured in Russia.

    The 2 seaters, to be co-designed and exclusively manufactured by HAL- will not be joining the IAF until much later than 2019. That HAL wrist-slapping is just hokum. This is the first time preliminary unit costs have surfaced ($93-$97m) and I don’t know how accurate the “specified 43 improvements” statement is, but clearly there is much more to come for the T-50/FGFA.

    I had the feeling they refer to the first IAF deliveries( initially slated for 2017, right ?)

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 2,087 total)