My question was not pointing at Murdoch and it is necessary to read the entire post
This entire story is being magnified by the fact that any don’t like Murdoch or the fact he’s a “non-national”.
Many Brits look at all rich, successful, business people with a jaundiced eye, the fact that he’s a foreigner (:eek:), only makes it worse.
My question was not pointing at Murdoch and it is necessary to read the entire post.
The primary vehicle to all this ‘hacking’ is not the Met, Murdoch or anyone so far fingered but the organisation that I have asked all of you to make an intelligent guess of.
Two letters and they hold all our communications destinies in their fickle hands and partial brains.
Suppliers braced for aircraft orders boom
Today’s FT
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6ba60a5e-a71a-11e0-a808-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=crm/email/2011719/nbe/Aerospace/product#axzz1SZUsF2K1
Suppliers braced for aircraft orders boom
Nifty charts – pie and bar (I had to eye estimate conversions from bar charts)
Demand
Boeing – value of aircraft deliveries in 2010 $bn (estimates) – Source: RBC Capital
737NG………$25.3 bn
777………….$18.0 bn
767………….$1.8 bn
Total……….$45.1 bn
Demand
Airbus – value of aircraft deliveries in 2010 $bn – Source: RBC Capital
A320……….$22.8 bn
A330……….$16.7 bn
A380……….$5.9 bn.
A321……….$4.6 bn
A319……….$3.6 bn
A340NG……$1.0 bn
Total………$54.7 bn (I make it $54.6 bn)
Aircraft Deliveries – actual number – Source: Ascend, Forecast International
Year Airbus Boeing
2010 510 450
2009 490 470
2008 485 360
Aircraft Orders backlog – actual number- Source: Ascend, Forecast International
Year Airbus Boeing
2010 3700 3400
2009 3600 3300
2008 3900 3700
Suppliers braced for aircraft orders boom
Today’s FT
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6ba60a5e-a71a-11e0-a808-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=crm/email/2011719/nbe/Aerospace/product#axzz1SZUsF2K1
Suppliers braced for aircraft orders boom
Nifty charts – pie and bar (I had to eye estimate conversions from bar charts)
Demand
Boeing – value of aircraft deliveries in 2010 $bn (estimates) – Source: RBC Capital
737NG………$25.3 bn
777………….$18.0 bn
767………….$1.8 bn
Total……….$45.1 bn
Demand
Airbus – value of aircraft deliveries in 2010 $bn – Source: RBC Capital
A320……….$22.8 bn
A330……….$16.7 bn
A380……….$5.9 bn.
A321……….$4.6 bn
A319……….$3.6 bn
A340NG……$1.0 bn
Total………$54.7 bn (I make it $54.6 bn)
Aircraft Deliveries – actual number – Source: Ascend, Forecast International
Year Airbus Boeing
2010 510 450
2009 490 470
2008 485 360
Aircraft Orders backlog – actual number- Source: Ascend, Forecast International
Year Airbus Boeing
2010 3700 3400
2009 3600 3300
2008 3900 3700
Some good news in today’s FT – but also some gloom and doom
Some good news in today’s FT – but also some gloom and doom
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f2c75fda-a803-11e0-afc2-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=crm/email/2011719/nbe/Aerospace/product#axzz1SZUsF2K1
Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner close to arrival
“Within the next two months, Boeing’s first 787 – the company’s new, fuel-efficient wide-bodied jet – should finally be operational in the hands of All Nippon Airways, its launch customer.
With 835 orders worth $163bn at list prices from at least 56 customers, Boeing’s next big headache could be increasing production fast enough to meet its commitments…..
…..The aircraft maker is planning to produce 10 787s per month by 2013 – an aggressive target from a standing start that some observers fear will strain its supply chain and productive capabilities. ….”
The gloom is about subcontractors and the problematic supply chain and the doom is about what happens if this gets worse.
Nice pics – and here I was thinking a Bunny had taken Hugh H up literally
Nice pics – and here I was thinking a Bunny had taken Hugh H up literally – for a flight of course (perhaps one of fantasy);)
Great shots thanks – weather looks good at the time of shooting
Great shots thanks – weather looks good at the time of shooting:cool:
I may have posted in the wrong thread – mods pl. relocate if so
I may have posted the following in the wrong thread titled ‘Police Corruption” – mods pl. relocate to this thread if so
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=110622
19th July 2011, 10:26
I may have posted in the wrong thread – mods pl. relocate if so
I may have posted the following in the wrong thread titled ‘Police Corruption” – mods pl. relocate to this thread if so
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=110622
19th July 2011, 10:26
There are ‘bent’ humans in every profession/business
There are ‘bent’ humans in every profession/business.
Political correctness has made a police officer’s job almost untenable.
In the current context of phone hacking which all this furor is about, there are some that are getting off scot free.
For a moment consider what technology we are talking about.
Mobile and landline telephone numbers.
Who ultimately controls landlines and all mobile communication throughput ?
And who owns a hefty share within that one organisation? (They are non nationals)
For phone hacking to take place the major culprit is the organisation I am asking you to take the easiest guess at.
Other than the UK what developed nation with respect for their safety and sovereignty/democracy would permit such a vital organisation to have a large foreign share ownership.
It’s not just telephone hacking, this organisation is guilty of permitting or being involved in, it is the continuous lack of capacity planning which affects all businesses throughput (can be often the cause of crippling UK businesses who depend on IT networking).
Technically apart from ineptness many of the people employed in this organisation ‘know a little’ but not a lot about how their systems can be penetrated by people with malicious intent.
Of course telephone tapping can be authorised for serious anti-national (ie terrorist) and their should be a mechanism for that (which I am sure there is)
Telephone hacking is a completely different ‘ballpark’ – malicious intent rather than protecting peace/sovereignty.
Have you as yet guessed who the really guilty organisation is?
And if you have guessed correctly may I suggest that the organisation be the one in the dock on this crisis (and probably many others) with their directors facing jail.
There are ‘bent’ humans in every profession/business
There are ‘bent’ humans in every profession/business.
Political correctness has made a police officer’s job almost untenable.
In the current context of phone hacking which all this furor is about, there are some that are getting off scot free.
For a moment consider what technology we are talking about.
Mobile and landline telephone numbers.
Who ultimately controls landlines and all mobile communication throughput ?
And who owns a hefty share within that one organisation? (They are non nationals)
For phone hacking to take place the major culprit is the organisation I am asking you to take the easiest guess at.
Other than the UK what developed nation with respect for their safety and sovereignty/democracy would permit such a vital organisation to have a large foreign share ownership.
It’s not just telephone hacking, this organisation is guilty of permitting or being involved in, it is the continuous lack of capacity planning which affects all businesses throughput (can be often the cause of crippling UK businesses who depend on IT networking).
Technically apart from ineptness many of the people employed in this organisation ‘know a little’ but not a lot about how their systems can be penetrated by people with malicious intent.
Of course telephone tapping can be authorised for serious anti-national (ie terrorist) and their should be a mechanism for that (which I am sure there is)
Telephone hacking is a completely different ‘ballpark’ – malicious intent rather than protecting peace/sovereignty.
Have you as yet guessed who the really guilty organisation is?
And if you have guessed correctly may I suggest that the organisation be the one in the dock on this crisis (and probably many others) with their directors facing jail.
Extremely original views/close ups – thanks
Extremely original views/close ups – thanks
Thanks nice pics
Thanks nice pics:D
You have got to be jesting about the weather – certainly for the morning which was a write off. 😡
It did get sunny for the afternoon though. So it wasn’t a complete wash out.
FC
Okay I hear you, but to get great pics with glorious backgrounds gave me the impression it was good to fair at Fairford. Small mercies.
The weather anywhere in the globe is the most unpredictable factor affecting every human even with the most advanced forecasting tools available.
Great shots Martin – thanks – particularly like the C27J
Great shots Martin – thanks – particularly like the C27J which although I saw it at Farnborough 2008 it disappeared before public days at Farnborough 2010. The C27J has great potential sales in world military markets
It still a big (enjoyable) challenge for their bean counters and strategists
It still a big (enjoyable) challenge for their bean counters and strategists.
Once you step outside ‘home turf’ for production, all the big MNE issues come flooding into the equations, namely Transfer pricing, Tax advantages and their longevity, environmental and cultural issues in foreign countries, quality standards, and primarily the perception of the business goals by ‘non home turf’ players as senior executives.
This ain’t garments, trainers or automobiles to plan for, it is the future large Fixed (Tangible) assets of major revenue earners across the globe.:cool:
The biggest planning involved is deciding on an exit strategy (at the outset) from ‘non home turf’ investments – and this is being seen for real in the Customer Service (Call Centre) arena where off shoring costs of local salaries (‘non home turf’) is currently escalating hence many large firms are bringing business back ‘home’.:rolleyes: