dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2323379
    flateric
    Participant

    Is there an official statement about the T-50’s wingspan?

    -CLASSIFIED-

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2323382
    flateric
    Participant

    How deep are the bays?
    Remember the YF-23 solution?

    that turned out to be not ATF-23 solution, but Northrop’s ‘white team’
    offering for some generic white-world fighter(s)

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2323385
    flateric
    Participant

    I wonder if they could use a adaptor (something like APU-60-2) to squeeze in more missiles?

    no. 4 missiles/bombs in the MWBs, 2 short-range missiles in fast bays
    live with that

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2323661
    flateric
    Participant

    http://s019.radikal.ru/i604/1208/32/2502ca517e67.jpg

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2326279
    flateric
    Participant

    can everyone stop damn overquoting please?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2326500
    flateric
    Participant

    Ka-62 is mainly for civilian use. Next!

    Ka-60 is cancelled. RD-600 is cancelled. Ka-62 will be offered to RuAF.

    But what is it’s Russian designation and NATO code name?

    Alligator/Hokum-B (what about using Google?)

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2326988
    flateric
    Participant

    http://s006.radikal.ru/i214/1208/e2/c32f0fc09d1f.jpg

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2328433
    flateric
    Participant

    externally, twin-seater PMI/FGFA compared to T-50 will be more distinct departure than T-10U from T-10S when talking of forward fuselage and canopy
    have heard mixed opinions of its look in terms of aesthetics

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2329389
    flateric
    Participant

    Have a full pic of that model by any chance , Flateric? 🙂

    I have even more, but don’t want to release before some articles will see the light of the day

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2329461
    flateric
    Participant

    What about you have any opinion about will it join the tests in a near future or no idea?

    there were massive efforts to return to flight again and it would happen prior to centennial…but BOHICA
    but those are just subtle glitches compared to what was solved already
    so we definitely see her back in the air
    50-1 being the only bort number equipped with anti-spin chute and Bogdan saying in interview that high AoA tests to begin soon – there’s something behind it:)

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2329649
    flateric
    Participant

    No point in asking if you can elaborate i guess? 🙂

    the first question they will ask is “who told you that exactly?”

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2330373
    flateric
    Participant

    T-50-4 was quoted recently as very soon, also I heard this fall ie. September to November. At the start of the year the quote was summer. So should not be to far away.

    QC

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2330381
    flateric
    Participant

    Any news about the T 50-1, is it still living? Will it join the tests for super maneuverability?

    live but with … mixed success

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2330385
    flateric
    Participant

    Did 50-2 and 50-3 flew aswell couple of days ago? (after the 100 years VVS show)

    people in situ say yep – on 8/16

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2330554
    flateric
    Participant

    50-2 was flying today

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 692 total)