dark light

flateric

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 692 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2286967
    flateric
    Participant

    most other aircraft by road transport is not done through angled support

    all depends on road clearances you have

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2293469
    flateric
    Participant

    cellphone picture definitelly….

    it was a somewhat hot day with hot air rising over the ground. hence the quality

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2293472
    flateric
    Participant

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2296181
    flateric
    Participant

    spotters shoot through the wire fence

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2296354
    flateric
    Participant

    Ssshhh! It has to be ’53’…’cause the mods have removed it from rp.net

    it’s 50-3, readily distinguished by absence of nose pitot boom
    photos were removed just because pics were out of RP quality standarts

    PS Please don’t use IMG tags and just give link to RP page with photo – authors will be grateful as it’s a matter of correct view count

    in reply to: RuAF aviation, news and development thread #2305417
    flateric
    Participant

    looks like Trident’s dream of an AWACs based on a passenger jetliner frame is getting closer.

    Tu-214R is not an AWACS. RIVET STARski

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2306525
    flateric
    Participant

    patience you must have, young padavan)

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2306567
    flateric
    Participant

    just for those who’s in despair – T50-2 was seen yesterday circling in the skies over UUBW

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2343267
    flateric
    Participant

    Nice model of PAK-FA, hell of a payload :).

    what happens if you put all the wrong missiles in wrong places? this happens

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2343269
    flateric
    Participant

    What is this RSUO-5 for ?

    Raspredelyonnaya Sistema Upravleniya Oruzhiem – Distributed Fire Control System

    flateric
    Participant

    Why did it take so bloody long to find them ?

    personal emergency beacons didn’t activate as there was no ejection. and RuAF aircrafts doesn’t have GLONASS/GPS transponders

    and – it happens everywhere

    11/17/2010 – JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska (AFNS) — Alaska Air National Guard search and rescue crews have found the apparent wreckage of an F-22 Raptor Nov. 17 that was assigned to the 3rd Wing here.

    The jet lost contact with air traffic control at 7:40 p.m. local time while on a routine training mission Nov. 16.

    A search was coordinated by officials with the Alaska ANG Rescue Coordination Center. Airmen in HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters and an HC-130 King combed an area northeast of Cantwell, Alaska, the last known location of the aircraft.

    “The other pilot (Rocky One) went to a tanker, got gas and then continued to look for the mishap pilot,” Colonel McMullen said. “He could not find him. At that time, the Alaska ANG scrambled a C-130 and rescue helicopters. They searched the entire night.”

    About 10:15 a.m., an Alaska ANG helicopter found a site that fits the data and the description of where rescuers thought the mishap probably occurred, Colonel McMullen said

    more recent MoD incognito-sourced statements say that ‘Rakushin died on impact, too and it was paramedic’s mistake who erroneously determined that body at crash site has vital signs’

    all accident investigation boards have their skeletons in the closet…

    flateric
    Participant

    http://radikal.ru/F/s019.radikal.ru/i620/1203/19/f0299e811b05.jpg

    Crew did not eject. Co-pilot Lt. Maksim Fyodorov died in crash, pilot Lt. Col. Dmitry Rakushin survived impact, but was heavily injured. Sadly, SAR team found crash site only in the morning of March 13. Rakushin was found near helo remains, but has died upon SAR chopper arrival to Torzhok…

    AF CnC Zelin arrived at site. Ka-52s data recorders are found intact. Investigation on a run.

    http://ncontent.life.ru/media/2/news/2012/03/85387/180-2.jpg
    Pilot Lt. Col. Dmitry Rakushin
    http://ncontent.life.ru/media/2/news/2012/03/85387/180-180.jpg
    Co-pilot Lt. Maksim Fyodorov

    Early reports of bad snowy weather are not confirmed by local meteorologists.

    Sad day for Army aviation…RIP to the crew.

    flateric
    Participant

    Has addition of canards on Indian Su-30 MKI brought any improvement in combat aerodynamics/cruise aerodynamics of it? Anybody?

    canards were added to Su-27 ‘integrated triplane’ clones to solve problems, caused by forward fuselage weigh growth and moving CoG forward, and allowed also to:
    – add lift force (among other things, by interaction of vortex coming from canards over wing) – with less alpha
    – moving a/c aerodynamic focus to more optimal position
    – adding negative pitching moment at high alpha and take-off and landing regimes (last was important for carrier-based T-10K)

    meantime, Pavel Plunsky of Sukhoi says that ‘heavy nose’ was not such a big problem and canards were not such extreme necessity, but Chief Designer Simonov ‘just wanted them to be’

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2295508
    flateric
    Participant

    Flateric did u vote today? :diablo:

    yep!

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2295584
    flateric
    Participant

    Anyway a nice “what-if”

    Andreas, you know that I hate what-ifs:diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 692 total)